¹ For the impression which Déprez's work (published in Paris in 1908) made on Tout, see Tait, J.'s obituary notice in Eng. Hist. Rev., xlv (1930), 82Google Scholar; Tout reviewed it in ibid., xxiii (1908), 556–9.

² Chapters was published by Manchester University Press, in whose foundation Tout was centrally involved, between 1920 and 1933. For a statement of its developing purpose, see Chapters, I, pp. 4–6, and III, pp. vi–vii.

³ ‘Literature and learning in the English civil service in the fourteenth century’, Speculum, iv (1929), 366.Google Scholar

⁴ Price, D. T. W., A history of St. David's University College, Lampeter, I (Cardiff, 1977), p. 202Google Scholar; Tout, T. F., ‘The English civil service in the fourteenth century’, Bull. John Rylands Library, iii (1916–1917), 185–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar, reprinted and elaborated in The collected papers of Thomas Frederick Tout, III (Manchester, 1934), pp. 191–221Google Scholar (with the playful quotation on p. 185).

⁵ See the list of his later writings compiled by his widow (History, xiv (1929–1930), 323–4).Google Scholar

⁶ Obituary in Proc. British Academy, xv (1929), 517.Google Scholar

⁷ Chapters, III, pp. 187–201. For the queens, see H. Johnstone, ibid., v, pp. 231–89; ‘The queen's exchequer under the three Edwards’, Historical essays in honour of James Tait, ed. Edwards, J. G. et al. (Manchester, 1933), pp. 145–53Google Scholar; and The English government at work, 1327–1336, ed. Dunham, W. H. et al. , I (Cambridge, Mass., 1940), pp. 250–99.Google Scholar For the Black Prince, see Sharp, M., Chapters, v, pp. 289–440Google Scholar, and ‘The administrative chancery of the Black Prince before 1362’, Essays in mediaeval history presented to Thomas Frederick Tout, ed. Little, A. G. et al. (Manchester, 1925), pp. 321–33.Google Scholar

⁸ Chapters, III, p. v; V, pp. v–vi; Somerville, R., The history of the duchy of Lancaster, I (London, 1953).Google Scholar

⁹ Denholm-Young, N., Seignorial administration in England (Oxford, 1937)Google Scholar, with the quotation taken from the preface. See the posthumously published essays of McFarlane, K. B., The nobility of later medieval England (Oxford, 1973).Google Scholar

¹⁰ Chrimes, S. B., Introduction to the administrative history of mediaeval England (Oxford, 1952), p. 241.Google Scholar For the changing emphasis in fifteenth-century historiography, see Guth, De Lloyd J., ‘Fifteenth-century England: recent scholarship and future directions’, British Studies Monitor, vii (2) (1977), 3–50.Google Scholar

¹¹ Some corners of the subject have been illuminated by Otway-Ruthven, A. J., The king's secretary and the signet office of the XV century (Cambridge, 1939)Google Scholar; Brown, A. L., The early history of the clerkship of the council (Glasgow, 1969)Google Scholar, and ‘The privy seal clerks in the early fifteenth century’, The study of mediaeval records: essays in honour of Kathleen Major, ed. Bullough, D. A. et al. (Oxford, 1971), pp. 260–81Google Scholar; Hastings, M., The court of common pleas in fifteenth-century England (Ithaca, N.Y., 1947)Google Scholar; Blatcher, M., The court of king's bench, 1450–1550 (London, 1978).Google Scholar

¹² See Storey, R. L., Diocesan administration in the fifteenth century (2nd edn., York, 1972)Google Scholar; and, for some examples, Dunning, R. W., ‘The households of the bishops of Bath and Wells in the later middle ages’, Proc. Somerset Arch, and Nat. Hist. Soc., cx (1966), 24–39Google Scholar, and Dobson, R. B., Durham Priory, 1400–1450 (Cambridge, 1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹³ Good series of records survive, for example, for Shrewsbury (now being studied by Mr. D. R. Walker) and Exeter (deposited in the Devon Record Office). See the forthcoming paper by Horrox, R. M., ‘Urban patronage in the fifteenth century’Google Scholar (which also uses the archives of Beverley and Hull), which the author allowed me to read in typescript.

¹⁴ Trésor de la langue française, IVGoogle Scholar, sub ‘bureau’, quoting the royal household accounts for 1316. For Brecon's exchequer, see Staffordshire Record Office, D 641/1/5/2; for Carmarthen's chancery, exchequer and green cloth, Griffiths, R. A., The Principality of Wales in the later middle ages, I: South Wales, 1277–1536 (Cardiff, 1972), pp. 37–40Google Scholar; for Durham's organization, Dobson, , Durham PrioryGoogle Scholar; for the exchequer at Christ Church, Canterbury, Knowles, D., The religious orders in England, II (Cambridge, 1957)Google Scholar, ch. XXV; and for the administration of Bath and Wells, Dunning, R. W., ‘The administration of the diocese of Bath and Wells, 1401–1491’ (unpublished University of Bristol Ph.D. thesis, 1963).Google Scholar

¹⁵ Trésor de la langue française, sub ‘bureau’. See also Cotgrave, R., Dictionarie of the French and English tongues (1611Google Scholar, reprinted 1968 and based on a sixteenth-century compilation), sub ‘bureau’; Dictionnaire de la langue française, I (edns. of 1882 and 1953), sub ‘bureau’; Dictionnaire de la langue française du seizième siècle, II, sub ‘bureau’.

¹⁶ A new English dictionary, I (1888)Google Scholar, sub ‘bureau’.

¹⁷ On the other hand, women were often landowners in their own right and very occasionally occupied lowly administrative positions for brief periods (for example, Kent County Archives Office, U71/M49, for Juliana Bromlegh, beadle of Orlestone in 1421–2).

¹⁸ Calendar of ancient deeds, I, p. 453Google Scholar; Cal. Pat. Rolls, 1485–04, p. 407Google Scholar; Middle Temple records, ed. Martin, C. T., I (London, 1904), p. 5Google Scholar; P.R.O., E. 159/307, Michaelmas, m.46. He died in 1532 (P.R.O., P.C.C. 20 Thower).

¹⁹ Griffiths, R. A., ‘William Botiller: a fifteenth-century civil servant’, Trans. Bristol and Glos. Arch. Soc., lxxxiii (1964), 70–7.Google Scholar For his record as chamberlain of south Wales, see Griffiths, , ‘Royal government in the southern counties of the principality of Wales, 1422–85’ (unpublished University of Bristol Ph.D. thesis, 1962), ch. VIII.Google Scholar

²⁰ Kirby, J. L., ‘The issues of the Lancastrian exchequer and Lord Cromwell's estimates of 1433’, Bull. Inst. Hist. Res., xxiv ( 1951 ), 131–4Google Scholar; Proceedings and ordinances of the privy council of England, ed. Nicolas, N. H. (7 vols., London, 1834–1837), III, p. 22.Google Scholar

²¹ Wedgwood, J. C., History of parliament: Biographies of the members of the commons house, 1439–1509 (London, 1936), pp. 851–2Google Scholar (quotingfrom his will, P.R.O., P.C.C. 31 Luffenham); Roskell, J. S., The commons in the Parliament of 1422 (Manchester, 1954), pp. 224–5.Google Scholar For his connection with Lord Ferrers of Chartley, Lord Sudeley, the bishop of Worcester and the abbot of Evesham, see Carpenter, M., ‘Political society in Warwickshire, c. 1401–72’ (unpublished University of Cambridge Ph.D. thesis, 1976), p. 106Google Scholar; Wedgwood, , History of Parliament, Biographies, p. 852Google Scholar; Roskell, , Parliament of 1422, p. 225Google Scholar; Hereford and Worcester Record Office, 705/175/92475.

²² For vacations at Westminster, see Tout, , Chapters, II, pp. 97–8Google Scholar; Proceedings of the Privy Council, VI, p. 297.Google Scholar

²³ P.R.O., E.101/620/24 (1426–30).

²⁴ Hereford Record Office, B63/5 dorse. See also Wedgwood, , History of Parliament, Biographies, p. 120.Google Scholar He had been in the royal household and exchequer since Henry V's day (Cal. Pat. Rolls, 1416–22, pp. 63, 105Google Scholar; ibid., 1441–46, p. 344).

²⁵ Carpenter, , ‘Political society in Warwickshire’, pp. 104, 106, 108Google Scholar; Shakespeare Birthplace Trust, Willoughby MS. 642a. For John Verney's Beauchamp service, see Ross, C. D., The estates and finances of Richard Beauchamp, earl of Warwick (Dugdale Soc., 1956), P. 8.Google Scholar

²⁶ Du Boulay, F. R. H., The lordship of Canterbury (London, 1960), pp. 274–5Google Scholar; Somerville, , Duchy of Lancaster, I, pp. 411, 625.Google Scholar

²⁷ Wedgwood, , History of Parliament, Biographies, p. 461.Google Scholar

²⁸ Emden, A. B., A biographical register of the University of Oxford to A.D. 1500 [B. R. U. 0.], II (Oxford, 1958), pp. 1289–91Google Scholar; Storey, R. L., The end of the house of Lancaster (London, 1966), pp. 41, 52, 62.Google Scholar

²⁹ Above, p. 114; V.C.H., Warwicks., IV (London, 1947), pp. 13, 16–17.Google Scholar

³⁰ See Hoccleve's works, ed. Furnivall, F. J. and Gollancz, I. (Early English Text Soc., I–III, 1892–1897)Google Scholar, and Reeves, A. C., ‘Thomas Hoccleve, bureaucrat’, Medievalia et Humanistica, new ser., v (1974), 201–14.Google Scholar

³¹ Somerville, , Duchy of Lancaster, I, pp. 439–40, 445nGoogle Scholar; Cal. Pat. Rolls, 1429–36, p. 453; Westminster Abbey MS. 27,489, m.2; P.R.O., P.C.C. 6 Godyn.Google Scholar

³² For Kebell, see Ives, E. W., ‘Promotion in the legal profession of Yorkist and early Tudor England’, Law Quarterly Review, lxxv (1959), 348–63Google Scholar (with the passage quoted on p. 358 from The Coventry leet book, ed. Harriss, M. D., II (Early English Text Soc., 1908). P. 527).Google Scholar

³³ Orme, N., English schools in the middle ages (London, 1973)Google Scholar, and Education in the west of England, 1066–1548 (Exeter, 1976)Google Scholar; Moran, J. H., Education and learning in the city of York, 1300–1600 (York, 1979)Google Scholar; The history of the Gwydir family, ed. Ballinger, J. (Cardiff, 1927), P. 50.Google Scholar

³⁴ Maxwell-Lyte, H. C., ‘The Hody family’, Somerset and Dorset notes and queries, xviii (1925), 127Google Scholar. For the fining of a nativus who sent his son to a grammar school without permission, see Gloucestershire Record Office, D621/M10, m.id (1437–8); and for the subject in general, Orme, , English schools, pp. 50–2.Google Scholar

³⁵ Emden, , B.R.U.O., II, pp. 941–2Google Scholar; Dunning, , ‘Administration of Bath and Wells’, P. 379.Google Scholar

³⁶ Storey, , Diocesan administration, pp. 14–17.Google Scholar

³⁷ Emden, , B.R.U.O., II, pp. 1312–13Google Scholar; III (1959), p. 1985. For Morgan, see most recently Bull, M.-L., ‘Philip Morgan (d. 1435): Ecclesiastic and statesman’ (unpublished University of Wales M.A. dissertation, 1976).Google Scholar

³⁸ E.g., Dobson, , Durham Priory, ch. 4Google Scholar; Boulay, Du, Lordship of Canterbury, pp. 249, 260–3Google Scholar; Knowles, , Religious orders, pp. 284–5, 312.Google Scholar

³⁹ For the disappearance of tallies as receipts, see Denholm-Young, , Seignorial administration, p. 21Google Scholar and n. 8; and for the use of bills, even by tradesmen, The Stonor letters and papers, ed. Kingsford, C. L. (Camden Third Series, 1919), pp. 90–1 (1479).Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Storey, , Diocesan administration, p. 33Google Scholar; Boulay, Du, Lordship of Canterbury, pp. 260–76Google Scholar; Dobson, , Durham Priory, p. 125Google Scholar. For the trend towards laicization in the chancery's service by Richard II's reign, see Maxwell-Lyte, H. C., Historical notes on the use of the great seal of England (London, 1926), pp. 2–3Google Scholar; Tout, T. F., ‘The household of the chancery and its disintegration’, Essays in history presented to R. L. Poole, ed. Davies, H. W. C. (Oxford, 1927), pp. 82–3Google Scholar; Pollard, A. F., ‘The clerk of the crown’, Eng. Hist. Rev., lvii (1942), 314CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pollard, , ‘Fifteenth-century clerks of parliament’, Bull. Inst. Hist. Res., xv (1937–1938), 139Google Scholar; Pollard, ‘The mediaeval underclerks of parliament’, Bull. Inst. Hist. Res., xvi (1938–1939), 70–1.Google Scholar

⁴¹ Wilkinson, B., The chancery under Edward III (Manchester, 1929), chs. IV, VIGoogle Scholar; Tout, , ‘The household of the chancery’, pp. 73 ff.Google Scholar

⁴² Maxwell-Lyte, , Great seal, p. 34.Google Scholar

⁴³ Above, p. 113; Tout, T. F., ‘The human side of mediaeval records’, T.R. Hist. S., 4th ser., 11 (1928), 6.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ Ives, E. W., ‘The common lawyers in pre-Reformation England’, T.R. Hist. S., 5th ser., 18 (1968), 152Google Scholar, quoting P.R.O., S.P. 1/10, fos. 50–2.

⁴⁵ Boulay, Du, Lordship of Canterbury, pp. 273–5.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ Orme, , English schools, pp. 75–9Google Scholar; Walter of Henley and other treatises on estate management and accounting, ed. Oschinsky, D. (Oxford, 1971)Google Scholar; Harvey, P. D. A., ‘Agricultural treatises and manorial accounting in mediaeval England’, Agric. Hist. Rev., xx (1972), 170–82.Google Scholar

⁴⁷ Richardson, H. G., ‘An Oxford teacher of the fifteenth century’, Bull. John Rylands Library, xxiii (1939), 436–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and ‘Business training in mediaeval Oxford’, American Hist. Rev., xlvi (1940–1941), 259–80.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ Cf. Roxburgh, R., The origins of Lincoln's Inn (Cambridge, 1963).Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Tout, , ‘The household of the chancery’, pp. 46–85.Google Scholar

⁵⁰ Walker, S. M., ‘The Plumpton correspondence: an historical and social survey’ (unpublished University of Leeds M.A. thesis, 1962), pp. 138–9.Google Scholar

⁵¹ For some of the Hody family, see Wedgwood, , History of Parliament, Biographies, pp. 460–1Google Scholar; D.N.B., XXVII, p. 78Google Scholar; Maxwell-Lyte, , ‘The Hody family’, 127–9Google Scholar; for Ross, Hugfords, Estates and finances of Richard Beauchamp, p. 8Google Scholar; Wedgwood, , History of Parliament, Biographies, pp. 478–80Google Scholar; Carpenter, , ‘Political society in Warwickshire’, pp. 102, 112–13, 117Google Scholar; and for Appletons, see their wills, P.R.O., P.C.C. 7 Rous, 48 Marche, 17 Luffenham. Cf. Pollard, , ‘Clerk of the crown’, 312, 324.Google Scholar

⁵² Walter of Henley, p. 317.Google Scholar

⁵³ Ibid., pp. 10–50, with the Dunster manuscript (B.L., Egerton MS. 3724) described on pp. 21–2. For supplementary comment, see Harvey, , ‘Agricultural treatises’, 17082Google Scholar, with additional manuscripts noted on pp. 178–9.

⁵⁴ Brown, , ‘Privy seal clerks’, 260 ffGoogle Scholar. (with Hoccleve's formulary in B.L., Add. MS. 24,062); Griffiths, , Principality of Wales, p. 61Google Scholar; Pantin, W. A., ‘English monastic letter-books’, Essays to Tait, pp. 201–22.Google Scholar

⁵⁵ E.g., Stones, E. L. G., ‘Sir Geoffrey le Scrope (c. 1285–1340), chief justice of the king's bench’, Eng. Hist. Rev., lxix (1954), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁵¹ Somerville, , Duchy of Lancaster, I, pp. 445, 634Google Scholar; Cal. Pat. Rolls., 1446–52, p. 245Google Scholar. For his service in Wales see, for example, P.R.O., S.C.6/1225/3, m.6; /4, m.6; /5, m.8.

⁵⁷ Borthwick Institute, York, Register of John Kemp, fo. 179V, quoted in Witchell, M., ‘John Kemp (d. 1454): an ecclesastic as statesman’ (unpublished University of Wales M.A. thesis, 1979), p. 260, n. 35.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ Above, p. 120.

⁵⁹ Foss, E., A biographical register of the judges of England (London, 1870), pp. 348–9Google Scholar; D.N.B., XXVII, p. 78Google Scholar; Devon Record Office, CR 621; Wiltshire County Record Office, 490/1480; Rawcliffe, C., The Staffords, earls of Stafford and dukes of Buckingham, 1394–1521 (Cambridge, 1978), p. 220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁶⁰ Ross, , ‘Estates and finances of Richard Beauchamp’, p. 11, n. 3Google Scholar; Wedgwood, , History of Parliament, Biographies, pp. 851–2Google Scholar; Roskell, , Parliament of 1422, pp. 224–5Google Scholar; above, p. 113.

⁶¹ Brown, A. L., ‘The reign of Henry IV: the establishment of the Lancastrian régime’, Fifteenth-century England, 1399–1509, ed. Chrimes, S. B. et al. (Manchester, 1972), pp. 14 ffGoogle Scholar; Morgan, D. A. L., ‘The king's affinity in the polity of Yorkist England’, T.R. Hist. S., 5th ser., 23 (1973), 1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Chrimes, S. B., Henry VII (London, 1972), ch. 1Google Scholar. For Harper, see Cal. Pat. Rolls, 1452–61, pp. 49, 570Google Scholar; ibid., 1461–67, p. 91; Cal. Close Rolls, 1454–61, p. 56.Google Scholar

⁶² The marcher lordships of south Wales, 1415–1536, ed. Pugh, T. B. (Cardiff, 1963), pp. 84–5, 290Google Scholar; Rawcliffe, , Staffords, pp. 59, 128, 199, 226, 242Google Scholar; P.R.O., P.S.O. 2/1 (24–25 September 1485).

⁶³ The Paston letters and papers, ed. Davis, N., pt. II (Oxford, 1976), p. 276Google Scholar. For Russe, see ibid., p. 103; Wedgwood, , History of Parliament, Biographies, pp. 730–1.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Maxwell-Lyte, , Great seal, p. 34Google Scholar; above, p. 118.

⁶⁵ Paston letters, ed. Davis, , pt. I (Oxford, 1971), PP. 600–1Google Scholar; Richard Whetehill was controller of Calais from 2 December 1460 (Cal. Close Rolls, 1454–61, p. 472)Google Scholar. For a similar commendation see Dobson, , Durham Priory, p. 129.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ Mitchell, J., Thomas Hoccleve (Urbana, Ill., 1968), ch. 1Google Scholar; Reeves, , ‘Thomas Hoccleve’, 201–14.Google Scholar

⁶⁷ Berkshire Record Office, D/EC/M97. For doodles, see Tout, , ‘Human side of medieval records’, p. 6.Google Scholar

⁶⁸ P.R.O., S.C.6/1160/12. For their appointment, see Cal. Pat. Rolls, 1422–29, p. 54.Google Scholar

⁶⁹ P.R.O., P.C.C. 18 Holgrave. For Lussher and Gunter, see above, pp. 121, 123; for their service together in Wales, P.R.O., P.S.O. 2/1.

⁷⁰ Cal. Fine Rolls, 1413–22, p. 432Google Scholar; ibid., 1422–30, pp. 22, 190; ibid., 1429–35, p. 236; Cal. Close Rolls, 1422–29, p. 458 (Appleton)Google Scholar; P.R.O., C.1/26/251; 19/10, 188; C.81/1376/5 (Gorfen).

⁷¹ Cal. Pat. Rolls, 1413–16, pp. 247, 338Google Scholar; ibid., 1422–29, p. 54; ibid., 1429–36, pp. 189, 254; P.R.O., S.C.6/1167/4, m.4 (Appleton); 1160/12; 1167/7, m.9 (Bedford).

⁷² Cal. Pat. Rolls, 1422–29, p. 459Google Scholar; ibid., 1429–36, pp. 70, 189; P.R.O., P.C.C. 25 Luffenham.

⁷³ Brown, , Clerkship of the council, pp. 20–8Google Scholar; Emden, A. B., A biographical register of the University of Cambridge to 1500 (Cambridge, 1963), pp. 126–7.Google Scholar

⁷⁴ London, Guildhall Record Office, Register V, fos. 166V–167 (1455).

⁷⁵ Above, p. 113; Kirby, , ‘Issues of the Lancastrian exchequer’, 131–4Google Scholar; V.C.H., Herts., III (London, 1912), pp. 441 ff.Google Scholar

⁷⁶ V.C.H., Herts., III, pp. 454–5Google Scholar. See Foss, , Register of judges, p. 282 (for Fray)Google Scholar; above, p. 115; Somerville, , Duchy of Lancaster, I, pp. 439–40Google Scholar, 445n (Walsh), and pp. 435–6 (Luthington); P.R.O., E.404/73/3/24, 46; 76/1/1 (Parr). See the ‘court of good company’, a kind of bureaucrats' dining club over which Henry Somer, chancellor of the exchequer, presided on 1 May 1410 (Hoccleve's Works, I, pp. 64–6).Google Scholar

⁷⁷ For seignorial councils, see Denholm-Young, , Seignorial administration, pp. 25–31Google Scholar, and, most recently, Rawcliffe, C., ‘Baronial councils in the later middle ages’, Patronage, pedigree and power in later mediaeval England, ed. Ross, C. D. (Gloucester, 1979), pp. 87–108.Google Scholar

⁷⁸ E.g., Cal. Close Rolls, 1447–54, P. 502; ibid., 1454–61, p. 431; Shakespeare Birthplace Trust, DR 98/497a (1446). The entire matter of arbitration needs fuller investigation.

⁷⁹ E.g., Derbyshire Record Office, 410 M/Box 14/488 (1446); Box 1/432 (1455).

⁸⁰ E.g., Leicestershire Record Office, 26/D 53/2328 (1454–5); Somerset Record Office, DD/L Box 1/17/3 (1422), and (for dies concordie) DD/CC/110739/15 (1439–40). For this subject, see Bennett, J. W., ‘The mediaeval loveday’, Speculum, xxxiii (1958), 351–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and, in relation to the Welsh march, Davies, R. R., Lordship and society in the march of Wales, 1282–1400 (Oxford, 1978), pp. 245–8.Google Scholar

⁸¹ Griffiths, R. A., ‘Local rivalries and national politics: the Percies, the Nevilles and the duke of Exeter, 1452–55’, Speculum, xliii (1968), 589–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Storey, , End of Lancaster, ch. XIII.Google Scholar

⁸² Walter of Henley, p. 343.Google Scholar

⁸³ E.g., Kingsford, C. L., English historical literature in the fifteenth century (Oxford, 1913), pp. 339, 341Google Scholar; Proceedings of the Privy Council, V, p. 288Google Scholar; The Paston letters, ed. Gairdner, J. (6 vols., London, 1904), III, pp. 25, 27.Google Scholar

⁸⁴ Northamptonshire Record Office, Finch-Hatton MS. 454. See Storey, , End of Lancaster, p. 91.Google Scholar

⁸⁵ E.g., Griffiths, R. A., ‘Patronage, politics and the principality of Wales, 1413–61’, British government and administration: studies presented to S. B. Chrimes, ed. Hearder, H. and Loyn, H. R. (Cardiff, 1974), pp. 68–86.Google Scholar

⁸⁶ H.M.C., Salisbury manuscripts, pt. II (London, 1888), p. 63 (1573)Google Scholar, partially quoted in Tout, , ‘The household of the chancery’, p. 83.Google Scholar