Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Wright, Owain
2018.
The Encyclopedia of Diplomacy.
p.
1.
Article contents
Some Aspects of Castlereagh's Foreign Policy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 February 2009
Extract
But little is yet known of the vast mass of documents bearing upon nineteenth-century history which are to be found in the archives of Europe; and historians have been tempted to take refuge in the thought that, after all, these papers contain little that is really of great value. How far that is true for any period of the nineteenth century may, I think, be doubted; but for the period during which Castlereagh held office, it can, surely, be urged that the unpublished documents in the Record Office are of real importance. Singularly, little attention has been paid by English historians to this period of history, and but little use has as yet been made of unpublished material. It is true that the collections of papers in the Londonderry correspondence and the Wellington Supplementary Dispatches contain a vast amount of information; but, valuable as this is, it is only a small fragment of the whole, and much of it can only be interpreted by the aid of other evidence. What has already been done in this way has thrown much new light on the character and achievements of Castlereagh. Fyffe was able to appreciate his career and his connexion with the congress system with much more justice, because he had seen some of the documents of the years 1814–15; and Mr. Alison Phillipps' monographs in the ‘Cambridge Modern History’ have already destroyed many of the fictions which had masqueraded as facts during the century. But as yet no detailed study of this period, based upon the archives, has appeared. Castlereagh's career has attracted but little attention and sympathy. There is no detailed account in English of the congress of Vienna, still less of the later congresses of Aix-la-Chapelle, Troppau, and Laibach. Yet, even if it be not admitted that Castlereagh was himself a great statesman, the circumstances of his life make the policy of England during his period of office well worthy of particular attention. From 1814 to 1822 England was connected with the Continent by ties far stronger than any which have bound her before or since. Not merely was she bound by treaties of exceptional character, but her leading statesman had exceptional personal relations with those of the other powers during a period which has never been surpassed in the invention of new methods of diplomacy, and the solution of difficult problems of immense importance. In these questions Castlereagh took a leading, at times a dominant, part. He was the creator of the great treaty which made it certain that Napoleon would no longer rule over France; he was the decisive factor at the Congress of Vienna, for it was he alone who made England take so commanding a position in the critical questions of Poland and Saxony; and he had perhaps a greater share than any other statesman in securing that period of comparative peace for Europe which was the first necessity of its future progress.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1912
References
page 69 note 1 Gentz indeed announced as much to the public in the Oesterreichischer Beobachter, 06 12, 1815Google Scholar: cf. Gervinus, , Geschichte des XIXten Jahr hunderts, i. 249.Google Scholar
page 69 note 2 See e.g. Beer, , Die orientalische Politik Oesterreichs seit 1774, p. 265.Google ScholarMrPhillipps, Alison' article in the Cambridge Modern History, x. 175.Google Scholar
page 69 note 3 Castlereagh, to Liverpool, , 02 13, 1815.Google ScholarF.O. Continent, 12.Google Scholar
page 70 note 1 See Angeberg, , Congrès de Vienne, ii. 864Google Scholar, and Gagern, , Mein Antheil an der Politik, ii. 320.Google Scholar Gagern knew that the Projet was inspired by England, and was not very satisfied with its redaction. He wrote: ‘Les anglais avoient déjà fait préparer par M. Gentz une espèce d'adieu au nom du congrès pour dire à peupres: “nous n'avons pas sçu mieux faire.” Je joins ici ce pièce. Des connoisseurs pensent que le style n'en est pas assez simple, ni le français assez pur et je doute quelle soit adoptée’ (op. cit. p. 133).Google Scholar
page 72 note 1 Circular dispatch, 02 13, 1815.Google ScholarF.O. Continent, 8.Google Scholar
page 72 note 2 SirRobt, . Liston, to Castlereagh, , 03 10, 1814.Google ScholarF.O. Turkey, 82.Google Scholar
page 72 note 3 SirRobt, , Liston, to Castlereagh, , 07 25, 1814.Google ScholarF.O. Turkey, 82.Google Scholar
page 72 note 4 Gentz, , Dépêches inéditesGoogle Scholar, tom, . i. pp. 121, 142.Google Scholar
page 72 note 5 Castlereagh, to Liston, , 02 14, 1815.Google ScholarF.O. Continent, 12.Google Scholar Mr. Alison Phillipps has drawn attention to this dispatch: see Cambridge Modern History, x. 803.Google Scholar In the same volume there is also a record of a conversation of Castlereagh with Macvrogeni, the Turkish representative, on the subject.
page 73 note 1 Talleyrand appears, however, to have been only partly informed of the nature of the transaction: cf. Correspondance du Comte de Jancourt avec le Prince de Talleyrand pendant le Congrès de Vienne, p. 217.Google Scholar
Liston, to Wellington, , 03 25, 1815.Google ScholarF.O. Congress, 26.Google Scholar
Liston, to Wellington, , 04 4, 1815.Google ScholarF.O. Misc., 95/23.
page 74 note 1 I am as yet unable to trace the exact course of the subsequent developments. According to Gentz, both Russia and England opposed the scheme at a later date (loc. cit. p. 165).Google Scholar According to a Russian ‘Projet d'instruction,’ the issue was still doubtful on May 25 (Shilder, , History of Alexander I, iii. p. 540).Google Scholar Talleyrand also claimed credit for defeating a similar scheme at the close of the congress (Talleyrand, , Memoirs, iii. 210).Google Scholar I have been unable to find any documents in the Record Office dealing with subsequent English policy.
page 74 note 2 ‘Mais soit que le pacte des garanties réciproques basse partie de l'instrument général du congrès, soit qu'en raison des circonstances actuelles, les autres cabinets se décident à en ajourner la sanction, les principes de ce pacte étant inhérents à ceux qui ont reglé la réconstruction européenne il s'en suit necessairement, que les Puissances seront dont le cas de s'y conformer, sans y être astreintes par une stipulation, diplomatique’ (Shilder, , loc. cit.).Google Scholar
page 74 note 3 Wellington, , Supplementary Dispatches, xi. 176.Google Scholar
page 76 note 1 Castlereagh, to Liverpool, , Chaumont, 02 26, 1814.Google ScholarF.O. Congress, i.Google Scholar For Metternich's first impression of Castlereagh, see Fournier, , Der Congress von Chatillon, pp. 251, 252.Google Scholar
page 77 note 1 Stewart, to Castlereagh, , 06 23, 1816.Google ScholarF.O. Austria, 127.Google Scholar
page 77 note 2 Castlereagh, to A'Court, 01 1, 1816.Google ScholarF.O. Sicily, 74.Google Scholar
page 78 note 1 Castlereagh, to Gordon, , 03 11, 1818.Google ScholarF.O. Austria, 133.Google Scholar
page 81 note 1 Castlereagh, to Stewart, (private), 07 9, 1816.Google ScholarF.O. Austria, 125.Google Scholar
page 81 note 2 Castlereagh, to Stewart, and Clancarty, 08 6, 1816.Google ScholarF.O. Germany, 8.Google Scholar
page 82 note 1 Castlereagh, to Stewart, and Clancarty. Cas. Mem., xi. 275.Google Scholar
page 82 note 2 Stewart, to Castlereagh, , 01 5, 1817.Google ScholarF.O. Austria, 134.Google Scholar
page 83 note 1 Metternich to Esterhazy, March 26, 1817. F.O. Austria, 138.Google Scholar
page 84 note 1 Stewart, to Castiereagh, , 03 34, 1816.Google ScholarF.O. Austria, 135.Google Scholar
page 86 note 1 Castlereagh, to Stewart, , 05 5, 1817.Google ScholarF.O. Austria, 133.Google Scholar
page 86 note 2 Stewart, to Castlereagh, , 06 13, 1817.Google ScholarF.O. Austria, 136.Google Scholar
page 87 note 1 Castlereagh, to Rose, , 04 4, 1817.Google ScholarF.O. Prussia, 106.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by