Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T13:23:06.299Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trade with the Enemy in the Scandinavian and Baltic Ports during the Napoleonic War: for and against

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

A. N. Ryan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The French victories over Prussia and Russia in 1806–07 enabled Napoleon to impose upon the continent a peace diametrically opposed to the interests of Britain. An essential condition of it, as was made clear in the Berlin Decree and the Franco-Russian treaty of Tilsit, was that Britain should be banished from Europe. Within a few months of the Tilsit agreement in July 1807 all the northern powers, except Sweden which kept out of the French alliance until 1810, were formally at war with Britain and were pledged to break their commercial connexions with her. It appeared that Napoleon, with the aid of Russia, Prussia and Denmark–Norway, had finally shut the Baltic to British trade and had thus made the commercial exclusion of Britain from the continent a reality. As things turned out, trade between Britain and the north of Europe, though harassed by enemy commerce raiders and impeded by French agents, was not destroyed. The Scandinavian and Baltic ports, the last in Europe to come under French influence, were never firmly closed even when Napoleon''s continental system was most effectively enforced in 1811

Type
Research Article
Information
Transactions of the Royal Historical Society , Volume 12 , December 1962 , pp. 123 - 140
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 123 note 1 Melvin, F. E., Napoleon''s Navigation System (New York, 1919), p. 9; Mahan, A. T., The Influence of Seapower on the French Revolution and Empire,1393–1812 (London, 1891–1996), ii, pp. 272 ff.; A. Vandal, Napoléon et Alexandre Ier. L'alliance russe sous le premier Empire (Paris, 1896), i, pp. 449 ff.Google Scholar

page 123 note 2 , Melvin, op. cit., pp. 17 ff.; Correspondence de Napoléon Ier (Paris, 1858–1969), xv, p. 416, no. 12899.Google Scholar

page 124 note 1 A., BaringAn Inquiry into the Causes and Consequences of the Orders in Council and an Examination of the Conduct of Great Britain towards the Neutral Commerce of America, 2nd edn. (London, 1808), p. 177.Google Scholar

page 124 note 2 Auckland to Grenville, 18 May 1806, Report on the MSS. of J. B. Fortescue, Esq., preserved at Dropmore (Hist. MSS. Comm., 1912), viii, p. 142.

page 124 note 3 , Fitzwilliam to Grenville, 3 Nov. 1806Google Scholar, ibid., viii, p. 421.

page 124 note 4 The Times, 16 09. 1806; Kaufmann, W. W., British Policy and the Independence of Latin America, 1804–1828 (New Haven, 1951), p. 27.Google Scholar

page 124 note 5 Humphreys, R. A., Liberation in South America, 1806–1828: The Career of James Paroissien (London, 1952), pp. 1 ffGoogle Scholar

page 125 note 1 , Kaufmann, op. cit., pp. 29 ff.; Ferns, H. S., Britain and Argentina in the Nineteenth Century(Oxford, 1960), pp. 36 ff.Google Scholar

page 125 note 2 B[ritish] M[useum], Add. MSS., Auckland Papers, 34457, fo. 38, unsigned note dated 21 09. 1806.

page 125 note 3 Crouzet, F., L'économie britannique et le blocus continental, 1806–1813 (Paris, 1958), i, pp. 68 ff.Google Scholar

page 125 note 4 The West India Committee, 40 Norfolk Street, London, W.C.2, Minute Books of the West India Committee, 2nd Series, 1804–22, iv, pp. 125 ff. and 139; B.M., Add. MSS., Spencer Perceval Papers, 49178, bundle 6, Minute of the Privy Council, 2 Feb. 1807.

page 125 note 5 Tyne Mercury or Northumberland, Durham and Cumberland Gazette,26 Jan. 1808.

page 126 note 1 P[ublic] R[ecord] O[ffice], B.T. 1/38, p. 75, Shairp to Canning, 18 Feb.1808; p. 78, Shairp to Board of Trade, 23 Feb. 1808.

page 126 note 2 B.M., Add. MSS., Spencer Perceval Papers, 49177, 33/12, Stephen to Perceval, 5 Dec. 1807; Add. MSS., 49178, bundle 3, undated paper by Bathurst on Orders in Council. See also Buckingham to Grenville, 3 Jan.1808, Dropmore Papers (Hist. MSS. Comm., 1915), ix, p. 164

page 127 note 1 B.M., Add. MSS., 49178, Mr Perceval''s original suggestions for the Orders in Council, 12 Oct. 1807. On the decline of trade between Denmark and France, see Kirsten Heils, Les rapports économiques franco–danois sous le Directoire, le Consulat et l'empire. Contribution à l'étude du systéme continental (Paris, 1958), pp. 193 ff.

page 127 note 2 For examples, see P.R.O., P.C. 2/177, p. 371; 2/178, p. 34; 2/183, p. 686; 2/185, p. 598.

page 127 note 3 B.M., Add. MSS., 49278, bundle 3, Bathurst to Perceval, 5 Nov. 1807, and Bathurst''s undated paper on the Orders in Council.

page 128 note 1 B.M., Add. MSS., 49177, 33/12, Stephen to Perceval, 5 Dec. 1807.

page 128 note 2 B.M., Add. MSS., 34457, fo. 204, Holland to Auckland, undated; P.R.O., B.T. 1/36, p. 103, Memorial of London Shipowners, 26 June 1807.

page 128 note 3 , Crouzet, op. cit., ii, pp. 422 ff.Google Scholar

page 128 note 4 Letter signed ‘Britannicus’ in Tyne Mercury, 15 May 1810.

page 129 note 1 P.R.O., B.T. 1/50, p. 140, Memorial of the Merchants and Shipowners of Kingston-upon-Hull; Hull Advertiser and Exchange Gazette, 31 Mar.,7 Apr. 1810; The Rockingham and Hull Weekly Advertiser, 7 Apr. 1810.

page 129 note 2 P.R.O., B.T. 1/50, p. 237, Memorial of Merchants and Shipowners in Scarborough; p. 239, General Committee of Shipping Interest of North Shields to Beaumont, J. R., M.P., 28 04. 1810; B.T. 1/51, pp. 7, 10, 16, 40,55, Memorials of Shipowners of Liverpool, London, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, Greenock and Port Glasgow, North and South Shields.Google Scholar

page 129 note 3 P.R.O., B.T. 1/56, pp. 50 ff., Memorials of Shipowners of North and South Shields, Sunderland, Newcastle–upon–Tyne and Liverpool; pp. 63 ff., of London and Whitby.

page 129 note 4 Ryan, A. N., ‘The Defence of British Trade with the Baltic, 1808–13’,English Historical Review, lxxiv (1959), p. 449.Google Scholar

page 130 note 1 P.R.O., B.T. 1/56, p. 67, Memorial of Merchants and Shipowners of Kingston–upon–Hull; A Full Report of the Proceedings at Two Meetings of the Merchants, Shipowners, etc. etc., at Kingston–upon–Hull, April 4, 1811, and February 11, 1812, respecting the Granting of Licences to Foreign Ships; Togetherwith a Copy of the Memorial laid before the Board of Trade; and the Petition presented to the House of Commons (Hull, 1812), pp. 8 ff. Cited hereafter as Proceedings at Hull. The only copy of this account, as far as I know, is in the Central Library, Kingston-upon-Hull. The Chief Librarian, Mr Drewery, R. F. kindly drew my attention to it.Google Scholar

page 130 note 2 Proceedings at Hull, pp. 48 ff.; Parl[amentary] Deb[ates], 1st Series,1812, vol. xxi, cols. 979 ff.

page 130 note 3 P.R.O., B.T. 1/67, pp. 1 ff., Shipowners of London to Chetwynd,14 Apr. 1812; Petitions to House of Commons in 1812 from Shipowners of Plymouth, Hull, Scarborough, Aberdeen, Newcastle–upon–Tyne, South Shields and Sunderland against the licensing of foreign ships are printed inH[ouse of] C[ommons] J[ournal], lxvii, pp. 155, 193, 320, 345, 346, 386.

page 130 note 4 P.R.O., B.T. 1/56, p. 54, Memorial of Merchants of the Clyde trading to British North America; B.T. 1/64, p. 139, Memorial of the Proprietors of Fir Woods of Natural Growth in Scotland; B.T. 1/77, pp. 108 ff., MacKenzie to Rose, 13 Apr. 1811; p. 118, , MacKenzie to Innes, 28 05 1811; p. 137, Memorial of Merchants interested in Trade and Fisheries of British North American Colonies; p. 150, Inglis to Rose, 25 02. 1812.Google Scholar

page 131 note 1 Tyne, Mercury, 7 01. 1812; Leith and Edinburgh Telegraph, 3 01. 1812; The Tradesman, 1812, vol. viii, p. 326.Google Scholar

page 131 note 2 The Trade Winds, ed.Parkinson, C. N.(1948), pp. 27 ff. and 37.Google Scholar

page 131 note 3 Select Committee of the House of Lords, appointed to inquire into the means of extending and securing the Foreign Trade of the Country, and to report to the House: together with the Minutes of Evidence taken before the said Committee: 3 July 1820. H.L., p. 63: 1820, vol. iii, p. 443.

page 131 note 4 P.R.O., B.T. 1/56, p. 61, Memorial of British Subjects trading with Riga;p. 141, Memorial of Manufacturers and Chamber of Commerce of Glasgow;p. 143, Memorial of Manufacturers of Paisley; B.T. 1/57, p. 168, Petition from the Chief Importers of Baltic Timber and Deals; B.T. 1/59, p. 264, Memorial of Liverpool Merchants trading to the Baltic and the North of Europe; B.T. 5/21, 11 July 1812; West India Committee Minute Books, iv, pp. 223, 246. There is a comment on the importance of the Salt Trade in Liverpool Mercury, 24 Apr. 1812. See also T. C. Barker, ‘Lancashire Coal, Cheshire Salt and the Rise of Liverpool’, Trans. Hist. Soc. of Lanes, and Cheshire, ciii (1951), pp. 83 ff

page 132 note 1 Tyne, Mercury, 22 05 1810. Increased duties on foreign timber are criticized in Newcastle Chronicle, 13 04. 1811.Google Scholar

page 132 note 2 Hull Advertiser and Exchange Gazette, 24 02. 1810; The Rockingham and Hull Weekly Advertiser, 24 02. 1810.

page 132 note 3 P.R.O., B.T. 1/59, p. 266, Memorial of Merchants of Kingston-upon-Hull trading to the Baltic.

page 132 note 4 Proceedings at Hull, pp. 29 ff., 32 ff.

page 132 note 5 ibid., pp. 17, 30, 34.

page 132 note 6 Hull Advertiser, 15 Feb. 1812; The Rockingham, 6 Apr. 1811, 15 Feb.1812.

page 133 note 1 For foreigners in the Royal Navy, see Lewis, M. A., The Navy of Britain:a Historical Portrait (1948), pp. 312 ff.; also Letters and Papers of Admiral of the Fleet Sir Thomas Byam Martin, ed. Hamilton, Richard Vesey (Navy Rec. Soc, 1898), ii, p. 10.Google Scholar

page 133 note 2 Phillimore, J., Reflections on the Nature and Extent of the Licence Trade,2nd edn. (1811), p. 25. See also An Inquiry into the State of Our Commercial Relations with the Northern Powers(1811), pp. 73 ff.; The Quarterly Review,05 1811, pp. 459 ff.Google Scholar

page 133 note 3 Part. Deb., 1st Series, 1810, vol. xvii, pp. 165 ff.; ibid., 1812, vol. xxi, cols. 1046, 1068, 1105, 1161.

page 134 note 1 Graham, G. S., Seapower and British North America, 1783–1820 (Cambridge, Mass., 1941, p. 148. Parl. Deb., 1st Series, 1810, vol. 17, pp. 164 ff.Google Scholar

page 134 note 2 P.R.O., B.T. 5/20, 20 Apr.; 10, 22 May 1811.

page 134 note 3 , Graham, op. cit., p. 143; id., British Policy and Canada, 1774-91:A Study in Eighteenth Century Trade Policy (1930), pp. 100 ff.; D. Macpherson,Annals of Commerce (1805), iii, pp. 49 and 400; Cunningham, W., Growth of English Industry and Commerce in Modern Times (1892), p. 285.Google Scholar

page 134 note 4 , Graham,Seapower and British North America, 1783-1820, pp. 149 ff.;Albion, R. G., Forests and Seapower: The Timber Problem of the Royal Navy,1652–1862 (Cambridge, Mass., 1926), pp. 420 ff.Google Scholar

page 134 note 5 P.R.O., P.C. 2/186, p. 168, Cottrell to Barrow, 14 Apr. 1810; p. 1841 Aug. 1810; B.T. 1/59, p. 286, Inglis to Lack, 2 June 1810.

page 135 note 1 First Report from the Select Committee appointed to consider of the Means of Improving and Maintaining the Foreign Trade of the Country. H.C., 1821, vol. vi, p. 46.

page 135 note 2 , Parl. Deb., 1st Series, 1810, vol. xvii, p. 164.Google Scholar

page 135 note 3 Select Committee of the House of Lords, appointed to inquire into the means of extending and securing the Foreign Trade of the Country, etc., H.L., pp. 4,55 ff., 63: 1820, vol. iii, pp. 384, 435 ff., 443. For government''s belief that Baltic timber was required, see P.R.O., P.C. 2/185, P. 493, Fawkener to Percy, 25 Mar. 1810; p. 514, Cottrell to Ridley, 22 Mar. 1810; P.C. 2/186, p. 227, Cottrell to Moxon, 19 Apr. 1810.

page 135 note 4 Shairp to Chalmers, 25 Dec. 1809, Report on the MSS. of Earl Bathurst preserved at Cirencester Park (Hist. MSS. Comm., 1923), p. 137; An Inquiry into the State of Our Commercial Relations with the Northern Powers, pp.48 ff.; The Rockingham, 6 May 1809.

page 136 note 1 Oddy, J. J., European Commerce: Showing New and Secure Channels of Trade with the Continent of Europe(London, 1804), pp. 561 ff.;Postlethwayte, M.,Universal Dictionary of Trade and Commerce (1766), 2 vols.Google Scholar

page 136 note 2 P.R.O., B.T. 5/18, 24 Feb. 1808; 5/19, 12 Mar. 1810.

page 136 note 3 P.R.O., F.O. Russia 65/71, Shairp to Canning, 28 Oct. 1807; B.T. 1/45, p. 151, Hammond to Rose, 11 July 1809.

page 136 note 4 P.R.O., B.T. 1/59, Admiralty to Board of Trade, 17 Oct. 1809.

page 136 note 5 The Tradesman, 1809, vol. iii, p. 525.

page 136 note 6 Galpin, W. F., The Grain Supply of England during the Napoleonic Period (New York, 1925), p. 121.Google Scholar

page 137 note 1 P.R.O., B.T. 1/77, p. 127, letter from a ‘Friend to Trade, Shores of the Baltick’, 10 May 1811. The importance of salt imports to Sweden is discussed in Notice biographique sur la carrière politique du Comte Gustave Lagerbjelke et sur les faits personnels qui s'y rapportent. Ecrite par lui-même (Stockholm,1867), pp. 47 ff.

page 137 note 2 P.R.O., P.C. 2/180, p. 135; 2/181, p. 47; 2/183, p. no; 2/185, P.230-These are examples of licences to ship goods from one enemy port to another on condition that vessel touched at a British port during the voyage.

page 137 note 3 The Tradesman,1811, vol. vii, pp. 158, 339; 1812, vol. viii, p. 326.

page 137 note 4 P.R.O., B.T. 1/76, p. 85, Memorial of Manufacturers of Newcastleupon–Tyne.

page 138 note 1 Parl. Deb., 1st Series, 1812, vol. xxi, cols. 1111 ff.; Lindsay, W. S., History of Merchant Shipping and Ancient Commerce (London, 1874–1976), ii,pp. 313 ff.Google Scholar

page 138 note 2 Tønnessen, J. N., Kaperfart og Skipsfart (Oslo, 1955), pp. 259 ff.Google Scholar

page 138 note 3 ibid., pp. 273 ff.; Heils, Kirsten, op. cit., pp. 162 ff.Google Scholar

page 138 note 4 Archives des Affairès Etrangeres, Correspondance Commerciale, Dantzig xii. Considérations sur l'état du commerce de la Baltique à la fin de 1811, dated 7 Dec. 1811.

page 139 note 1 P.R.O., B.T. 1/54, pp. 5 ff., Atkins to Bathurst, 7 Jan.; 3 Jan. 1811; B.T.5/20, 16 Aug. 1810; P.C. 2/188, p. 79, Fawkener to Croker, 6 July 1810;Adm. 2/1370, Admiralty to Saumarez, 3 Aug. 1810.

page 139 note 2 Hidy, R. W.,The House of Baring in American Trade and Finance:English Merchant Bankers at Work, 1763–1861 (Cambridge, Mass., 1949), p. 37. For an interesting account of the campaign against the Orders in Council, see Crouzet, L'économie britannique et le Hocus continental, ii, pp.809 ff.Google Scholar

page 139 note 3 Parl. Deb., 1st Series, 1810, vol. xvii, p. 166; 1812, vol. xxi, cols. 1047,1062, 1106, 1126. For Brougham''s attitude towards the United States, see The Life and Times of Henry, Lord Brougham, Written by Himself(Edinburgh,1871), ii, p. 10.

page 140 note 1 P.R.O., P.C. 2/178, pp. 86, 507; 2/179, P. 51; 2/l80, P. 7; 2/182, P. 577; 2/185, P. 382.

page 140 note 2 Petitions of the shipowners of North Shields, Sunderland, London, South Shields and Scarborough in favour of Orders in Council, H.C.J., lxvii, pp. 377–78, 386, 395.

page 140 note 3 George Rose (1744–1818), Vice-President of the Board of Trade and Treasurer of the Navy.

page 140 note 4 The Rockingham and Hull Weekly Advertiser, 15 Feb. 1812.