Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T13:01:37.185Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Tudors and the Currency, 1526–1560

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

Extract

It is the special boast and glory of the English currency that for more than a thousand years it has maintained its original weight and purity in a far higher degree than any of its neighbours. In the whole course of our history only one severe shock has been given to the credit of the English coinage, the one with which this paper deals. Save in this one single case, the currency has been spared by even the worst, the weakest, and the most unfortunate of our rulers. In the clash of the Norman Conquest, in the evil days of King John, in the long thriftless administration of Henry III., in the anarchy of the Wars of the Roses, in the sharpest stress of the Great Rebellion, no ruler of England ever laid hands on the coin of the realm to alloy its purity or cut down its size. It is true that in the attrition of the ages the first of English coins, the venerable silver penny, has sunk to about one-third of its original weight. Offa, its first creator, struck it to the standard of 22 grains; Queen Victoria's Maundy penny of to-day weighs 7¼ grains. But this shrinkage has been due not to deliberate dishonesty in any series of kings or ministers, but to the variations of the ratio between gold and silver in the last five centuries, since the day when Edward III. first added gold money to the currency of the realm.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1895

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 171 note 1 I can only remember the Earl of Devon's sack of Exeter and the Earl of Wilts' plunder of Hungerford in 1459.

page 177 note 1 The alloy being left out of account in each case.

page 180 note 1 A synonym for the coin, borrowed from the French teston, the name of the large piece which resembled our shilling in size and bore the king's head as chief type.

page 182 note 1 An old groat weighed 48 grains only, and the new shilling 80, so the good Bishop of Worcester was using some exaggeration in pretending to mistake one for the other.

page 186 note 1 244,416 lbs. at 60 shillings to the oz., would of course make only 733,248l. of pure silver; but the alloy at 11 dwt. per lb. accounts for the fact that 783,000l. was coined out of the above-named weight. Professor Thorold Rogers at this point gets hopelessly mixed between pounds troy and pounds sterling, and fails to see exactly what Elizabeth did.