Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g7rbq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T19:27:22.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Environmental Justice in India: The National Green Tribunal, by Gitanjali Nain Gill Routledge, 2017, 238 pp, £110 hb, ISBN 9781138921108

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2017

Michael Hantke-Domas
Michael Hantke-Domas*
Affiliation:
Chief Justice, Third Environment Court, Valdivia (Chile)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
Transnational Environmental Law , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , November 2017 , pp. 557 - 560
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 United States (US) Environmental Protection Agency, ‘Environmental Justice’, available at: https://www.epa.gov/environmentaljustice.

2 See also Gill, G.N., ‘Environmental Justice in India: The National Green Tribunal and Expert Members’ (2016) 5(1) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 175–205 Google Scholar.

3 National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, Act No. 19 of 2010, Parliament of India (NGT Act).

4 NGT Act, s. 2(m): ‘substantial question relating to environment’.

5 Original Application No. 21 of 2014, Various Orders, National Green Tribunal, Principal Bench, available at: http://www.greentribunal.gov.in.

6 Mendoza, Beatriz Silvia y otros v. Estado Nacional y otros s/ daños y perjuicios, Judgment, 8 July 2008, Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation of Argentina, M.1569.XL, available at: https://goo.gl/ff1uQT (in Spanish).

7 Gustavo Moya Ángel y Otros v. Empresa de Energía de Bogotá y Otros, Judgment, 28 Mar. 2014, State Council of Colombia, AP-25000-23-27-000-2001-90479-01, available at: https://goo.gl/EFGKTo (in Spanish).

8 Urgenda Foundation v. Government of the Netherlands (Ministry of Infrastructure and Environment), Judgment, 25 June 2015, The Hague District Court, Chamber for Commercial Affairs, ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2015:7196, C/09/456689/HAZA131396, available at: https://elaw.org/nl.urgenda.15. See also van Zeben, J., ‘Establishing a Governmental Duty of Care for Climate Change Mitigation: Will Urgenda Turn the Tide?’ (2015) 4(2) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 339–357 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and J. Peel & H.M. Osofsky, ‘A Rights Turn in Climate Change Litigation?’ (2018) Transnational Environmental Law (forthcoming).

9 Ashgar Leghari v. The Federation of Pakistan, Climate Change Orders of 4 and 14 Sept. 2015, Lahore High Court Green Bench, W.P. No. 25501/2015, available at: https://elaw.org/pk_Leghari. See also J. Peel & H.M. Osofsky, ‘A Rights Turn in Climate Change Litigation?’ (2018) Transnational Environmental Law (forthcoming).

10 Suddaby, R. & Viale, T., ‘Professionals and Field-Level Change: Institutional Work and the Professional Project’ (2011) 59(4) Current Sociology, pp. 423–442 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 DDA v. Rajendra Singh, AIR 2010 SC 2516. This involved a dispute regarding the construction of the Commonwealth Games Village in 2010 on a legally protected floodplain of the Yamuna River.

12 Pring, G. & Pring, C., Environmental Courts and Tribunals: A Guide for Policy Makers (United Nations Environment Programme, 2016), pp. 10, 50 Google Scholar.