Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
1979.
Current Bibliography of Urban History.
Urban History,
Vol. 6,
Issue. ,
p.
184.
Article contents
From ‘Feudal’ Lords to Figureheads
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 February 2009
Extract
The importance of landowners' influence on the timing, scale and type of development in many large nineteenth-century towns is a platitude of urban history. But the power which it gave a large, aristocratic, urban landowner to influence local affairs – political, cultural, religious and philanthropic – has received much less attention. Most historians would agree with Ralph Nevill that during the nineteenth century ‘the political influence of the English land-owning class must in any case have disappeared with the development of the great towns and the increase in population’. But while that change has been described and investigated as it occurred at Westminster and in the country-side, the actual shift in the balance of power in the towns – from those who owned and managed urban estates to those who lived on them as leasehold tenants – has received much less attention. The purpose of this article is to review the literature at present available on the subject, and to offer some suggestions as to the directions in which future research might proceed.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978
References
1. For two lists of urban, aristocratic landowners, see: Spring, David, ‘English land-owners and nineteenth-century industrialism’, in Ward, J. T. and Wilson, R. G. (eds), Land and Industry: The Landed Estate and the Industrial Revolution (Newton Abbot, 1971), 39–40, 42–3Google Scholar; Kellett, J. R., The Impact of Railways on Victorian Cities (1969), 127, 151, 176, 209, 246.Google Scholar For a brief discussion on landowners' behaviour and fuller references, see: Cannadine, David, ‘Victorian Cities: how different?’, Social History no. 4 (1977), 462–3.Google Scholar
2. Nevill, Ralph, English Country House Life (1925), 38–9.Google Scholar
3. The only work-full of insights which still need to be followed up-is Williams, J. E., ‘Paternalism in local government in the nineteenth century’, Public Administration, xxxiii (1955).Google Scholar
4. Escott, T. H. S., Social Transformations of the Victorian Age (1897), 113.Google Scholar
5. Gash, Norman, Politics in the Age of Peel: A Study in the Technique of Parliamentary Representation, 1830–1850 (1953), ch. ixGoogle Scholar and appendix D; Hanham, H. J., Elections and Party Management: Politics in the Time of Gladstone and Disraeli (1959), ch. iiiGoogle Scholar and appendix iii.
6. Nossiter, T. J., Influence, Opinion and Political Idioms in Reformed England: Case-Studies from the North East, 1832–1874 (Hassocks, 1975), 29, 118–23Google Scholar; Whiting, C. E. The University of Durham, 1832–1932 (1932), 223–9.Google Scholar
7. Lee, J. M., ‘Modern Stamford’, in Rogers, Alan (ed.), The Making of Stamford (Leicester, 1965)Google Scholar; Williams, J. E., ‘The growth and decline of the port of Whitehaven, Cumberland, 1650–1900’ (M.A. thesis, University of Leeds, 1951)Google Scholar; Zimmeck, M., ‘Chartered rights and vested interests: Reform era politics in three Sussex boroughs: Rye, Arundel and Lewes’ (M.A. thesis, University of Sussex, 1972)Google Scholar; Cunningham, T. C., ‘The growth' of Peterborough’ (Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, 1972)Google Scholar; Marchington, T., ‘The development of Buxton and Matlock since 1800’ (M.A. thesis, University of London, 1961).Google Scholar
8. Walton, J. K., ‘The social development of Blackpool, 1788–1914’ (Ph.D. thesis, University of Lancaster, 1974)Google Scholar; Gayler, H. J., ‘The coastal resorts of Essex: their growth and present-day function’ (M.A. thesis, University of London, 1965).Google Scholar
9. Sutton, J. H., ‘Early Fleetwood, 1835–47: a study in the genesis and early development of the new town, port and holiday resort of Fleetwood-on-Wyre, Lancashire’ (M.Litt. thesis, University of Lancaster, 1968)Google Scholar; Gurnham, R., ‘The creation of Skegness as a resort town by the ninth Earl of Scarborough’, Lincolnshire History and Archaeology, vii (1972)Google Scholar; Beastall, T. W., A North-Country Estate: The Lumleys and Saundersons as Landowners, 1600–1900 (1975), ch. viii.Google Scholar
10. Barrett, J. A., ‘The seaside resort towns of England and Wales’ (Ph.D. thesis, University of London, 1958)Google Scholar; Perkin, H. J., ‘The social tone' of Victorian seaside resorts in the North-West’, Northern History, xi (1976).Google Scholar
11. Bishop, C. H., Folkestone: The Story of a Town (Ashford, 1973)Google Scholar; Ellis, A. C., An Historical Survey of Torquay (Torquay 1930)Google Scholar; Bailey, F. A., A History of Southport (1955)Google Scholar; Young, D. S., The Story of Bournemouth (1957).Google Scholar The researches of Mr John Liddle of Lancaster University should throw much light on the role of the Scaris-brick family in Southport affairs.
12. Ward, David, ‘The pre-urban cadaster and the urban pattern in Leeds’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, iii (1962)Google Scholar; Kellett, , Impact of Railways, 150.Google Scholar
13. Shimmin, A. N., The University of Leeds: The First Half-Century (Cambridge, 1954), 17, 30, 36, 62, 67Google Scholar; Dumbell, S., The University of Liverpool, 1903–53 (Liverpool, 1953), 7, 36–7Google Scholar; Charlton, H. B., Portrait of a University, 1851–1951 (Manchester, 1951), 139–40Google Scholar; Chapman, A. W., The Story of a Modern University: The History of the University of Sheffield (Oxford, 1955), 99, 195Google Scholar; Moody, T. W. and Beckett, J. C., Queen's Belfast, 1845–1949: The History of a University (2 vols, 1959), ii, 482, 485.Google Scholar
14. Hanham, , Elections and Party Management, 80.Google Scholar
15. Meller, H. E., Leisure and the Changing City, 1870–1914 (1976), 91–5Google Scholar; Sanderson, Michael, The Universities and British Industry, 1850–1970 (1972), 71–3Google Scholar; Amery, J., The Life of Joseph Chamberlain, vol. iv (1951), ch. lxxxivGoogle Scholar; Briggs, Asa, The History of Birmingham, vol. ii (Oxford, 1951), 109–10.Google Scholar
16. Kellett, , Impact of Railways, 246Google Scholar; Summerson, John, Georgian London (1970), chs. iii, vii, xiiGoogle Scholar; Olsen, D., Town Planning in London in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries (1965)Google Scholar; idem, The Growth of Victorian London (1976), ch. iv.
17. Hanham, , Elections and Party Management, 80.Google Scholar
18. Davies, J., ‘Glamorgan and the Bute estate, 1776–1947’ (Ph.D. thesis, University of Wales, 1969)Google Scholar; idem, ‘The Second Marquess of Bute: a landowner and the community in the nineteenth century’, Glamorgan Historian, viii (1973)Google Scholar; Daunton, M. J., Coal Metropolis: Cardiff, 1870–1914 (Leicester, 1977)Google Scholar; idem, ‘Aristocrat and traders: the Bute Docks, 1839–1914’, Journal of Transport History, new series, iii, (1975).
19. Blair, D. Hunter, John Patrick, third Marquess of Bute, K.T., A Memoir (1921)Google Scholar; Crook, J.Mordaunt, ‘Patron extraordinary: John, third Marquess of Bute (1847–1900), in Victorian South Wales-Architecture, Industry and Society (seventh conference report, The Victorian Society, 1969)Google Scholar; Girouard, Mark, The Victorian Country House (Oxford, 1971), 125–30.Google Scholar
20. Owen, D. J., History of Belfast (1921), 187–92, 255–7Google Scholar; Strain, R.W. M., Belfast and its Charitable Society (1961), 212–37.Google Scholar
21. Maguire, W. A., ‘The 1822 settlement of the Donegall estates’, Irish Economic and Social History, iii (1976)Google Scholar; idem, ‘Lord Donegall and the sale of Belfast: a case-history from the Encumbered Estates Court’, Economic History Review, 2nd series, xxiv (1976).
22. Whomsley, Dennis, ‘A landed estate and the railway: Huddersfield, 1844–54’, Journal of Transport History, new series, ii (1974).Google Scholar
23. Gash, , Politics in the Age of Peel, xi.Google Scholar
24. Brook, Roy, The Story of Huddersfield (1968), 187.Google Scholar
25. Checkland, S. G., The Gladstones: A Family Biography, 1764–1851 (Cambridge, 1971), 174, 294Google Scholar; White, B. D., A History of the Corporation of Liverpool, 1835–1914 (Liverpool, 1951), 80Google Scholar; Richards, Eric, The Leviathan of Wealth: The Sutherland Fortune in the Industrial Revolution (1973), 61Google Scholar; Fraser, Derek, Urban Politics in Victorian England: The Structure of Politics in Victorian Cities (Leicester, 1976), 13.Google Scholar Neither Simey, M. B., Charitable Effort in Liverpool in the Nineteenth Century (Liverpool, 1951)Google Scholar, nor Jones, W. D., Lord Derby and Victorian Conservatism (Oxford, 1966)Google Scholar, has anything to say on the subject.
26. Churchill, Randolph S., Lord Derby: ‘King of Lancashire’ (1959)Google Scholar; Clarke, P. F., Lancashire and the New Liberalism (Cambridge, 1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Smith, E. A., Whig Principles and Party Politics: Earl Fitzwilliam and the Whig Party, 1748–1833 (Manchester, 1975)Google Scholar; Spring, David, ‘Earl Fitzwilliam and the Corn Laws’, American Historical Review, lix (1954)Google Scholar; Thompson, F. M. L., ‘Whigs and Liberals in the West Riding, 1830–1860’, English Historical Review, lxxiv (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Rowley, G., ‘Landownership in the spatial growth of towns: a Sheffield example’, East Midlands Geographer, vi (1975)Google Scholar
29. Perkin, H. J., ‘The development of modern Glossop’, in Birch, A. H. (ed.), Small Town Politics (Oxford, 1959)Google Scholar; Olsen, Donald, ‘House upon House’, in Dyos, H. J. and Michael Wolff (eds), The Victorian City: Images and Realities (2 vols, 1973).Google Scholar
30. Hawson, H.Keeble, Sheffield: The Growth of a City (Sheffield, 1968), 45, 135, 204, 216Google Scholar; Pollard, S., A History of Labour in Sheffield (Liverpool, 1959), 101–2, 111, 183.Google Scholar
32. Perren, R., ‘The effects of the agricultural depression on the English estates of the Dukes of Sutherland, 1870–1900’ (Ph.D. thesis, University of Nottingham, 1967).Google Scholar
33. Warrillow, E. J. D., A Sociological History of Stoke-on-Trent (Stoke-on-Trent, 1960) 157, 216, 351.Google Scholar
34. Bennett, Arnold, The Card (Harmondsworth, 1976), 9, 97, 101–5, 113–8, 130.Google Scholar
35. Raybould, T. J., The Economic Emergence of the Black Country: A Study of the Dudley Estate (Newton Abbot, 1973)Google Scholar; R. W. Sturgess, ‘Landowners, mining and urban development in nineteenth-century Staffordshire’, in Ward and Wilson, Land and Industry; idem, ‘The response of agriculture in Staffordshire to the price changes of the nineteenth century’ (Ph.D. thesis, University of Manchester, 1965).
36. Raybould, T. J., ‘The Dudley estate: its rise and decline between 1774 and 1947’ (Ph.D. thesis, University of Kent, 1970), 379–88.Google Scholar
37. R. H. Trainor's forthcoming Oxford D.Phil. thesis, ‘Authority and social structure in an industrial area: a study of three Black Country towns, 1840–90’, will contain much material on this subject.
38. Cannadine, David, ‘The Calthorpe family and Birmingham, 1810–1910: a “Conservative interest” examined’, Historical Journal, xviii (1975)Google Scholar; idem, ‘The aristocracy and the towns in the nineteenth century: a case-study of the Calthorpes and Birmingham, 1807–1910’ (D.Phil, thesis, University of Oxford, 1975).
39. Sykes, Christopher, Nancy: The Life of Lady Astor (1972), 107–9, 187–200, 226, 307, 473Google Scholar; Collis, Maurice, Nancy Astor: An Informal Biography (1960), 57, 127, 229–31.Google Scholar
40. Briggs, Asa, Victorian Cities (Harmondsworth, 1968), 38.Google Scholar
41. As this is primarily a bibliographical and speculative essay, footnotes in this section will only refer to works not already mentioned. The majority of the information used is taken, as will be clear, from the works cited in notes 18 to 39.
42. Thompson, F. M. L., ‘Land and politics in England in the nineteenth century’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 5th series, xv (1965)Google Scholar; Martin, David, ‘Land Reform’, in Hollis, Patricia (ed.) Pressure From Without in Early Victorian England (1974).Google Scholar
43. Redford, Arthur, The History of Local Government in Manchester (3 vols, 1939–40), 1, 192–6, 223–4, 348; II, 12, 92–4Google Scholar; Skidelsky, Robert, Mosley (1975), ch.i.Google Scholar
44. Best, Geoffrey, Mid-Victorian England, 1851–75 (1971), 239–43Google Scholar; idem, ‘The making of the English working class’, Historical Journal, viii (1965), 278.
45. MS diary of the seventh Duke of Devonshire (by kind permission of the Trustees of the Chatsworth Settlement): 15 December 1863, 20 May 1868, 6 October 1873.
46. Quoted in Burn, W. L., The Age of Equipoise: A Study of the Mid-Victorian Generation (1964), 309–10.Google Scholar
47. See especially: Reeder, David, ‘The politics of urban leaseholds in late Victorian England’, International Review of Social History, vi (1961)Google Scholar; Perkin, H. J., ‘Land reform and class conflict in Victorian Britain’, in Butt, J. and Clarke, I. F. (eds), The Victorians and Social Protest: A Symposium (Newton Abbot, 1973).Google Scholar
48. Perkin, H. J., The Origins of Modern English Society, 1780–1880, (1969), ch.x.Google Scholar
49. Sanderson, , Universities and British Industry, 81.Google Scholar The effect of a mayoral junket given by a grandee is beautifully caught by Bennett, in The Card, 9.Google Scholar
50. Jones, G. W., Borough Politics: A Study of the Wolverhampton Town Council, 1888–1964 (1969), 251–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lee, J. M., Social Leaders and Public Persons: A Study of County Government in Cheshire Since 1888 (Oxford, 1963).Google Scholar
51. Finlayson, G. B. A. M., ‘The politics of municipal reform, 1835’, English Historical Review, lxxxi (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Fraser, Urban Politics, chs. vi and x; Aydelotte, W. O., ‘The country gentlemen and the repeal of the Corn Laws’, English Historical Review, lxxxii (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ward, J. T., ‘West Riding landowners and the Corn Laws’, English Historical Review, lxxxi (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 1
- Cited by