Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T13:26:43.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Communities within the community: aspects of neighbourhood in seventeenth-century Haarlem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2009

Gabrielle Dorren
Gabrielle Dorren
Affiliation:
Faculteit der Geesteswetenschappen, Univ. of Amsterdam, 1012 VB Amsterdam
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper analyses the notion of neighbourhood in Haarlem, a Dutch town in the province of Holland, in the seventeenth century. During the first decades of the century the city magistrates were challenged by huge immigration, religious and cultural pluralism, and, due to the Dutch Revolt, a lack of a strong central power. In spite of these ingredients for social unrest, peace was preserved without too many difficulties. One of the mechanisms that kept society from falling apart was neighbourhood. Several levels of neighbourhood will be studied here and an answer is given for the growing interference of city magistrates with neighbourhood life.

Type
Research Article
Information
Urban History , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , August 1998 , pp. 173 - 188
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Garrioch, D., Neighbourhood and Community in Paris 1740–1790 (Cambridge, 1986).Google Scholar

2 Boulton, J., Neighbourhood and Society. A London Suburb in the Seventeenth Century (Cambridge, 1987), 247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Roodenburg, H., ‘Naar een etnografie van de vroegmoderne stad: de “gebuyrten” in Leiden en Den Haag’, in Boekhorst, P. te et al. (eds), Cultuur en maatschappij in Nederland 1500–1850 (Meppel and Amsterdam/Heerlen, 1992), 219–43.Google Scholar

4 Rappard, A.G.A., ‘De 's Gravenhaagsche buurten’, Mededeelingen van de Vereeniging ter beoefening der geschiedenis van 's Gravenhage (1863), 83–198Google Scholar; Roodenburg, ‘Naar een etnografie’.

5 Leiden: Pieck, G.T.H.C., ‘Jan van Hout en de Leidse buurten’, in Boer, D.E.H. de (ed.), Leidse facetten. Tien studies over Leidse geschiedenis (Zwolle, 1982), 35–51Google Scholar; Vlist, E. van der, ‘“In goeder vreden ende borgerlijcke eenicheyt”: Leidse buurten in de zestiende eeuw’, Jaarboek der sociale en economische geschiedenis van Leiden en omstreken (1989), 38–60Google Scholar; also Roodenburg, ‘Naar een etnografie’. Utrecht: Bogaers, L., ‘Een kwestie van macht? De relatie russen wetgeving op het openbaar gedrag en de ontwikkeling van de Utrechtse stadssamenleving in de zestiende en zeventiende eeuw’, Volkskundig Bulletin, 11 (1985), 102–26Google Scholar; idem, ‘Geleund over de onderdeur. Doorkijkjes in het Utrechtse buurtleven van de vroege middeleeuwen tot in de zeventiende eeuw’, Bijdragen en Mededelingen betreffende de Geschiedenis der Nederlanden, 112 (1997), 336–63.Google Scholar Ghent: Deceulaer, H., ‘Stadsbestuur en buurtbewoners in Gent. Interactie, participatie, en publieke opinie, 1658–1668’, Bijdragen en Mededelingen betreffende de Geschiedenis der Nederlanden, 110 (1995), 3–26Google Scholar; Jacobs, M., ‘Sociaal kapitaal van buren. Rechten, plichten en conflicten in Gentse gebuurten (zeventiende – achttiende eeuw)’, Volkskundig Bulletin, 22 (1996), 149–76.Google Scholar

6 Temminck, J.J., ‘Oude indelingen van Haarlem’, in Kuyper, F.W. and Sliggers, B.C. (eds), Liber amicorum: A.C. van der Steur: uitgegeven ter gelegenheid van zijn vijftigste geboortedag 3 mei 1988 (Haarlem, 1988), 187–97.Google Scholar

7 Jensen, J.N. Jacobsen, ‘Moryson's reis door en zijn karakteristiek van de Nederlanden’, Bijdragen en mededeelingen van het historisch genootschap, 39 (1918), 214–305, 225–26.Google Scholar

8 van der Woude, A.M., Het Noorderkwartier: een regionaal historisch onderzoek in de demografische en economische geschiedenis van westelijk Nederland van de late middeleeuwen tot het begin van de negentiende eeuw, AAG-Bijdragen 16 (Wageningen, 1972), vol. 1, 114.Google Scholar

9 Municipal archives of Haarlem (hereafter MAH), Secret Resolutions of the City Council, 1670–1741Google Scholar, after the resolution of 24 Mar. 1721: in 1632 5,377 houses stood within the walls, 1,110 outside. In 1643 there were 452 houses north of the wall, often populated by several families.

10 MAH, Correspondence received, 1690–1702Google Scholar, petitions concerning the cooperage of Jacobus Willemsz van Sassum, 1696.

11 Nierop, H. van, ‘Popular participation in politics in the Dutch Republic’, in Blickle, P. (ed.), Resistance, Representation, and Community (Oxford and New York, 1997), 272–90Google Scholar, esp. 284–88.

12 MAH, City archives, Resolutions of the burgomasters (hereafter Res. of b.), 23 Jun. 1603.

13 MAH, Judicial archives, Book of judgement, 1602–1615,11 06 1609.Google Scholar

14 MAH, City archives, Res. of b., 21 02 1696.Google Scholar

15 MAH, City archives. Res. of b., 13 02 1679.Google Scholar

16 MAH, Notorial archives, no. 125, f. 127, 25 02 1625.Google Scholar

17 MAH, Notorial archives, no. 125, f. 143, 12 03 1625.Google Scholar

18 MAH, Notarial archives, no. 125, 11 and 12 03 1625.Google Scholar

19 See on this subject C. Lis and H. Soly, ‘“Beter een goede buur dan een verre vriend”. Buurschap en buurtleven in Westeuropese steden aan het eind van het Ancien Régime’, in Vries, B. de, Nijhof, E. et al. (eds), De kracht der zwakken, Studies over arbeid en arbeidersbeweging in het verleden (Amsterdam, 1992), 81–107.Google Scholar

20 GAH, framed, has no inventory number. It was promulgated in 1626 and was certainly still functioning in 1643. The name Groot Heiligland, meaning literally Big Holyland, refers to a medieval cloister that was situated there.

21 In the cities of Holland municipal labourers and bricklayers earned 22 to 24 stuivers per day during the second quarter of the seventeenth century: Israel, J., The Dutch Republic, Its Rise, Greatness, and Fall 1477–1806 (Oxford, 1995), 352.Google Scholar

22 MAH, Judicial archives, 66–1,46.Google Scholar

23 GAH, Judicial archives, restant Enschedé, vols R-400: cash-book of the Koningstraat, 1623–1704.Google Scholar

24 In 1632 2.6 per cent were characterized in the cash-book as ‘poor’, in 1639 6.4 per cent and in 1647 14 per cent.

25 The Haarlem taxbooks of 1628 and 1650 mention all the households of every district without, however, specifying the gebuurten in the districts. There were certainly about 100 households involved and possibly another 50, though these are more doubtful.

26 To give an idea of the amount: this was as much as a year's salary for a very well-paid job, like that of organist in Haarlem's main church or headmaster.

27 Namely, the amount people who owned more than 1,000 guilders had to pay when they married.

28 As confirmed by other sources for Haarlem, such as the general ordinances on gebuurten of 1649 and 1670, and by evidence on The Hague and Leiden as mentioned by Rappard, ‘De 's Gravenhaagsche buurten’ and Pieck, ‘Jan van Hout’.

29 Ibid., 40–1.

30 Soutenus, D., Nuchteren Loth, Dat is, middel om op te staen uyt de ziel-verderffelijcke sonde van dronckenschap, tot een maetich ende Godtvruchtich leven (Haarlem, 1623).Google Scholar

31 Quintijn, G.J., De Hoilandsche Lys met de Brabandsche Bely (The Hague, 1629).Google Scholar

32 Jensen, Jacobsen, ‘Moryson's reis’, 226.Google Scholar

33 In 1619 it cost the life of the Advocate of Holland, Johan van Oldenbarnevelt. See for this crisis, for example, Israel, The Dutch Republic, 421–77.Google Scholar

34 MAH, City archives, By-laws and ordinances 3–2, 23 05 1640.Google Scholar

35 See Pieck, ‘Jan van Hout’ and also Van der Vlist, ‘In goeder vreden’, 52–54: in 1593 all ordinances in Leiden were replaced by a general one and in 1602 a redivision of the gebuurten took place.

36 MAH, City archives, rack 7–4–10–4, ‘Ordonnantie op de gebuurten’, 6 09 1649.Google Scholar

37 MAH, City archives, By-laws and ordinances, ‘Generale ordonnantie op alle de gebuurten’, 15 12 1670Google Scholar, art. 3.

38 MAH, City archives, Resolutions of the city council, 15 12 1670.Google Scholar

39 Temminck, , ‘Oude indelingen van Haarlem’, 193.Google Scholar

40 MAH, Judicial archives, Sheriff's civil proceedings 65–1, f. 41, 12, 13 and 30 01 1671Google Scholar; end of the process unknown.

41 MAH, Lottery archives, registers 1606–1607.Google Scholar

42 MAH, Library rack, 43 B 29, Register of the prizes of the Haarlem lottery, 10 05 1696–1695Google Scholar Jul. 1696.

43 Bogaers, ‘Een kwestie van macht?’ and ‘Geleund over de onderdeur’.

44 For seventeenth-century Haarlem there are no registers of citizenship left. We do not know what percentage of the population was officially citizen, but there is ample reason to believe that being an honourable, creditworthy resident was what really counted for citizens and non-citizens alike. On this subject see my article: ‘De eerzamen: zeventiendeeeuws burgerschap in Haarlem’, in Aerts, R. and Velde, H. te (eds), De stili van de burger. Over Nederlandse burgerlijke cultuur vanaf de middeleeuwen (Kampen, 1998), 60–79.Google Scholar

45 Knevel, P., Burgers in het geweer. De schutterijen in Holland, 1550–1700 (Hilversum, 1994).Google Scholar

46 The new area outside the walls excluded, where twelve neighbourhoods were. MAH, City register, case 13, no. 454Google Scholar: register of people who came to live in Haarlem, 1703–14.