Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-13T02:14:28.456Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conflicting visions of renewal in Pittsburgh’s Hill District, 1950–1968

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2016

LAURA GRANTMYRE*
Affiliation:
Instructor of History, Point Park Universitylgrantmyre@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Visual representations of the Lower Hill District created by Pittsburgh's redevelopment coalition and by neighbourhood insiders reveal the conflicting ways redevelopers and residents understood older neighbourhoods and their redevelopment. Redevelopers’ maps and photographs of the Lower Hill documented the neighbourhood's densely built-up blocks and intermixture of land uses as definitive examples of blight that threatened downtown's economic health. Models and architectural sketches of the Civic Arena – the jewel of the Lower Hill's redevelopment plan – promised to wipe away blight and renew the city. Redevelopers distributed their imagery through brochures and the city's daily press. Framed by captions labelling the Lower Hill a ‘blight’ and the Civic Arena a ‘wonder of the modern world’, these images helped sell the public on redevelopment. Lower Hill insiders, most notably the city's African American newspaper, the Pittsburgh Courier, and the Courier’s lead photographer, Charles ‘Teenie’ Harris, envisioned the Lower Hill and its redevelopment differently. Harris and the Courier criticized the neighbourhood's dilapidated housing but celebrated its thriving social life. They also supported redevelopment but saw it primarily as a route to new jobs and improved housing for Hill residents. After the Civic Arena opened in 1961, redevelopment failed to deliver more jobs or better housing because redevelopers’ worldview prioritized the built over the social environment. Hill District residents, led by the Courier, reacted to these shortcomings with visual protests pairing redevelopers’ favourite symbol of progress – the brand new Civic Arena – with symbols of racial injustice. By spotlighting the inequalities that undergirded redevelopers’ vision for the city, these protests stopped redevelopment from spreading further into the Hill in 1968.

Type
Special issue: Urban sights: visual culture and urban history
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 
Supplementary material: Link

Urban sights: visual culture and urban history

This package contains the third party link for one of the Urban History multimedia companions created to accompany the Urban History article entitled “Urban sights: visual culture and urban history” by Matt Delmont. Please note that links to third party resources will be retained here in the original form provided by the compilers of the multimedia companions. The Press does not warrant that links from archival entries will continue to function correctly and does not undertake to redirect or suppress links when third party sites cease to be available.

http://scalar.usc.edu/anvc/urban-sights-visual-culture-and-urban-history/index
Link