No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Editorial note
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 February 2009
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0963926800009135/resource/name/firstPage-S0963926800009135a.jpg)
- Type
- Editorial
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989
References
Notes
1 For a review of that tradition, and of the content and impact of the Urban History Yearbook, 1974Google Scholar, see Bloomfield, E., ‘The Urban History Yearbook— interdisciplinary forum or indispensable research tool?’, Urban History Review/Revue d'histoire urbaine, 16 (1987), 75–7.Google Scholar
2 For a review of this work see Mohl, R.A., ‘;The new urban history and its alternatives: some reflections on recent U.S. scholarship on the twentieth century city’, Urban History Yearbook, 1983, 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 ‘Register of Research in Progress on the History of London’, The London Journal, 13 (1987–1988), 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Dyos, H.J., ‘Editorial’, Urban History Yearbook, 1974, 5–6Google Scholar and his inaugural lecture, Urbanity and Suburbanity, 1973.Google Scholar
5 Wheatley, P., ‘European urbanization: origins and consummation’, Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 17 (1986), 415–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Rollison, D., ‘The bourgeois soul of John Smyth of Nibley’, Social History, 12 (1987), 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Ibid., his emphasis.