No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The transfer of foreign modernity in Beijing: the new urban space in the Legation Quarter, 1900–1928
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 July 2022
Abstract
This article suggests that the post-colonial viewpoint could be valuable in understanding Beijing during the colonial crisis between 1900 and 1928. Through the examination of urban space in the Legation Quarter, it pays attention to the emerging special types and forms, as well as the mechanisms behind them, and explains the transposition of a foreign modern cityscape to the local context. The Europeanized district in Beijing was a symbol of Western civilization and the uneven power dynamics in the city, and was regarded as both a spatial model and a competitor for the Chinese government's attempts to create a modern capital.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press.
References
1 Borel, H., The New China: A Traveller's Impressions (London, 1912), 31Google Scholar. Henri Borel (1869–1933) served as an official Chinese interpreter in the Dutch East Indies from the late 1800s to the early 1900s.
2 There were four layers of walls in traditional Beijing that, from the centre outward, demarcated the Forbidden City (Zi jin cheng), the Imperial City (Huang cheng), the Inner City (Nei cheng) and the Outer City (Wai cheng), the last of which was attached to the Inner City and shared its south wall.
3 T. Warner, ‘Die Planung und Entwicklung der deutschen Stadtgründung Qingdao (Tsingtau) in China: der Umgang mit dem Fremden’, TU Hamburg-Harburg Ph.D. thesis, 1996; Lu, H., Beyond the Neon Light: Everyday Shanghai in the Early Twentieth Century (Berkeley, 1999)Google Scholar; L. Victoir and V. Zatsepine (eds.), Harbin to Hanoi: The Colonial Built Environment in Asia, 1840 to 1940 (Hong Kong, 2013).
4 D. Gregory, R. Johnson, G. Pratt, M. Watts and S. Whatmore (eds.), The Dictionary of Human Geography (Malden, MA, 2009); King, A.D., ‘Internationalism, imperialism, postcolonialism, globalization: frameworks for vernacular architecture’, Perspectives in Vernacular Architecture, 13 (2006/07), 64–75Google Scholar.
5 L. Victoir and V. Zatsepine, ‘Introduction’, in Victoir and Zatsepine (eds.), Harbin to Hanoi, 1–16, at 3.
6 Cooper, F., Colonialism in Question Theory, Knowledge, History (Berkeley, 2005), 53Google Scholar.
7 K. Mühlhahn, ‘Mapping colonial space: the planning and building of Qingdao by German colonial authorities, 1897–1914’, in Victoir and Zatsepine (eds.), Harbin to Hanoi, 103–28.
8 B. Goodman and D.S.G. Goodman, ‘Introduction: colonialism and China’, in B. Goodman and D.S.G. Goodman (eds.), Twentieth-Century Colonialism and China: Localities, the Everyday and the World (Abingdon and New York, 2012), 13.
9 After the Russo-Japanese War, Dalian was colonized by Japan from 1905 until 1945.
10 Qingdao was occupied by Japan after World War I, and sovereignty was only returned to the Republic of China in 1922. However, Japan reoccupied the city in 1938 until the end of World War II. For more information on this kind of colonial city, see King, A.D., Colonial Urban Development: Culture, Social Power and Environment (London, Henley and Boston, 1976)Google Scholar; Wright, G., The Politics of Design in French Colonial Urbanism (Chicago, 1991)Google Scholar; Warner, ‘Die Planung und Entwicklung der deutschen Stadtgründung Qingdao (Tsingtau) in China’; B.S.A. Yeoh, Contesting Space: Power Relations and the Urban Built Environment in Colonial Singapore (Kuala Lumpur and New York, 1996); Scriver, P., Colonial Modernities: Building, Dwelling and Architecture in British India and Ceylon (London, 2007)Google Scholar.
11 Wright, The Politics of Design in French Colonial Urbanism; R.K. Home, Of Planting and Planning: The Making of British Colonial Cities (London, 1997); A.J. Njoh, Planning Power: Town Planning and Social Control in Colonial Africa (London and New York, 2007).
12 C. Roskam, ‘The architecture of risk: urban space and uncertainty in Shanghai, 1843–74’, in Victoir and Zatsepine (eds.), Harbin to Hanoi, 129–50, at 130.
13 The Legation Quarter in Beijing is regarded as a special concession in terms of its historical and political condition, administrative jurisdiction and military engagement; see C. Fei, Zhongguo zujie shi (The History of Concessions in China) (Shanghai, 1991), 345.
14 Y. Wei, Zhongguo jindai butong leixing chengshi zonghe yanjiu (The Comprehensive Study of Different Types of Chinese Cities in Modern Times) (Chengdu, 1998). Port city, on the one hand, refers to the ‘ports’ opened by the unequal treaties all over the country, not just on the seacoast or on rivers; on the other hand, it included the so-called self-opened ports, which were opened by the Chinese government without the need for foreign inducement.
15 A. Vidler, ‘The scenes of the street: transformations in ideal and reality, 1750–1871’, in S. Anderson (ed.), On Streets (Cambridge, MA, and London, 1978), 29–112; S.M. Low, On the Plaza: The Politics of Public Space and Culture (Austin, 2000); W. Benjamin, The Arcades Project (Cambridge, MA, and London, 1999); C.E. Schorske, Fin-de-siècle Vienna: Politics and Culture (New York, 1980); V.M. Lampugnani, ‘Vienna fin-de-siècle: between artistic city planning and unlimited metropolis’, in C.C. Bohl and J.-F. Lejeune (eds.), Sitte, Hegemann and the Metropolis: Modern Civic Art and International Exchanges (London, 2009), 25–38.
16 Lefebvre, H., The Production of Space (Oxford, 1991), 26Google Scholar.
17 For the content of the Boxer Protocol, with 19 annexes, see MacMurray, J.V.A., Treaties and Agreements with and concerning China, 1894–1919 (New York, 1921), 278–320Google Scholar.
18 For the map and description of the boundaries of the Legation Quarter, see ibid., 298–9.
19 M.J. Moser and Y.W.-C. Moser, Foreigners within the Gates: The Legations at Peking (Hong Kong and New York, 1993), 116.
20 Gamble, S.D., Peking: A Social Survey (New York, 1921), 110Google Scholar.
21 Ibid., 110–11.
22 It is difficult to know the exact figures for the number of foreigners residing in the Legation Quarter, since ‘the Diplomatic Corps controls the Legation Quarter and has never taken a census of those living inside its walls’, and ‘each legation keeps track of its own nationals living in Peking’. However, an approximate number in the thousands can be reached based on Gamble's social surveys, in which he stated that: ‘It is known, however, that the strength of the American Legation Guard, a detachment of the U.S. Marine Corps, is ordinarily about 300 men, and that the number of Americans who might contribute to the American Liberty Loan was well over 500. It is also known that the Americans are the largest group of foreigners in Peking, next to the Japanese.’ Ibid., 111.
23 Ibid.
24 J. Bredon, Peking: A Historical and Intimate Description of Its Chief Places of Interest (Shanghai, Hong Kong, Singapore, Hankow and Yokohama, 1922), 49.
25 MacMurray, Treaties and Agreements, 315–16.
26 H. Unokichi, Qingmo Beijing zhi ziliao (Documents on Beijing Annals in the Late Qing Dynasty) (Beijing, 1991), 244.
27 Ramsay, A., The Peking Who's Who (Peking, 1922), 50Google Scholar.
28 For the detail of the administration of the Legation Quarter and the operation of the ACDQ, including the financial system, police administration, public work maintenance and so on, see R.M. Duncan, Peiping Municipality and the Diplomatic Quarter (Peiping, 1933), 103–20.
29 Hall, T., Planning Europe's Capital Cities: Aspects of Nineteenth-Century Urban Development (London, 2005), 53Google Scholar.
30 T. Hall, ‘Urban planning in Sweden’, in T. Hall (ed.), Planning and Urban Growth in the Nordic Countries (London and New York, 1991), 167–246, at 187.
31 M. Polo and J. Masefield, The Travels of Marco Polo, the Venetian (London and New York, 1908), 174.
32 Townley, L.S.M.K., My Chinese Note Book (London, 1904), 234Google Scholar.
33 Sitwell, O., Escape with Me! An Oriental Sketch-Book (London, 1940), 203Google Scholar.
34 The map, which was influenced by the Western method of drawing in perspective, drew both the plan and façade of a building together.
35 It was also partly paid for by the Chinese government, to the tune of around 5,000 yuan each year as a subsidy, although the Legation Quarter was beyond the Beijing government's administrative authority; see Beijing Municipal Council, Jingdu shizheng huilan (Collected Reports on City Administration in Beijing) (Beijing, 1919), 103.
36 The only unpaved streets in the quarter covered about two miles and were reserved for heavy cart traffic; see Duncan, Peiping Municipality, 118, 145.
37 Ibid., 118.
38 Ibid.
39 L.C. Arlington and W. Lewisohn, In Search of Old Peking (Peking, 1935), 8.
40 Y. Li, Shui he Beijing: chengshi shuixi bianqian (Rivers and Beijing: The Transformation of the Water System in Beijing) (Beijing, 2004), 88–9.
41 Because the city wall extended eastward, the canal from Dongbuya Bridge to Chang'an Avenue came inside the imperial city, which stopped ships entering from Tongzhou. It also happened because the Baifu Spring gradually dried up during the Ming dynasty.
42 Department of Construction (Japanese Puppet Government), Jingshi chengnei hedao gouqu tushuo (Mapping the Rivers and Sewers in Beijing) (Beijing, 1941), 32.
43 According to Duncan, Mr Thiele had been connected with the Diplomatic Quarter since 1907, when he began his service in the Eastern Legation Quarter. From 1914, he worked for the ACDQ. All the work of street construction and maintenance in the quarter was under his supervision; see Duncan, Peiping Municipality, 145.
44 Moser and Moser, Foreigners within the Gates, 113.
45 Ibid.
46 But according to 石桥丑雄 (Ishibashi) from the Tourism Department of the Municipal Council, the project was finished later, in April 1925; see Department of Construction, Jingshi chengnei hedao gouqu tushuo, 33.
47 Ibid., 32–3.
48 The Beijing Municipal Council regarded covering the open canal as one of the important government projects in the early twentieth century, as can be seen, for instance, in the reconstruction of Xinhua Road. Influenced by the renewal of the Imperial Canal in the East Jiaomin Lane district, the north part of the Imperial Canal was soon reconstructed as a new street in the underground Western style, with a large horseshoe-shaped section of the sewer as well.
49 Y. Zhang, ‘Beijing shiguanjie zhi yange’ (The transformation of Beijing's Legation Quarter), in Y. Shen (ed.), Zhonghe yuekan shiliao xuanji (Selected Historical Materials from Zhonghe Monthly) (Taibei, 1970), 491–509, at 508.
50 K. Yao, ‘Beiping sumiao’ (A sketch of Beiping), in D. Jiang (ed.), Beijinghu: xiandai zuojia bixia de Beijing 1900–1949 (Beijing: Beijing by Modern Writers) (Beijing, 1992), 358–74.
51 Zhang, ‘Beijing shiguanjie zhi yange’, 508.
52 W. Wang, ‘Bei gongdi ji’ (A record of the north glacis), in C. Lin (ed.), Jingshi jiexiang ji (A Record of Streets and Alleyways in the Capital City) (Beijing, 1919), vol. III, section on Neizuoyiqu (the Inner Left First District), 7.
53 S. Song, ‘Dong Chang'an jie’ (A record of East Chang'an Street), in Lin (ed.), Jingshi jiexiang ji, vol. II, section on Neizuoyiqu (the Inner Left First District), 6.
54 ‘Protocol regarding Legation Quarter at Peking’, in MacMurray, Treaties and Agreements, 316.
55 Arlington and Lewisohn, In Search of Old Peking, 18–19; Moser and Moser, Foreigners within the Gates, 122.
56 Ibid.
57 Wang, ‘Bei gongdi ji’, 7.
58 Duncan, Peiping Municipality, 29.
59 Wang, ‘Bei gongdi ji’, 7. A zhang is a Chinese unit of measurement, which corresponds to 3⅓ metres.
60 R. Rogaski, ‘Hygienic modernity in Tianjin’, in J.W. Esherick (ed.), Remaking the Chinese City: Modernity and National Identity, 1900–1950 (Honolulu, 1999), 30–46, at 31.
61 Hall, Planning Europe's Capital Cities, 377.
62 Rogaski, ‘Hygienic modernity’, 76.
63 G. Casserly, The Land of the Boxers (London, New York and Bombay, 1903), 104.
64 W.A.P. Martin, The Siege in Peking: China against the World (New York, 1900); A.H. Tuttle, Mary Porter Gamewell and Her Story of the Siege in Peking (New York and Cincinnati, 1907).
65 B.L. Putnam Weale (ed.), Indiscreet Letters from Peking (New York, 1907), 1.
66 M. Ricci and N. Tregault, China in the Sixteenth Century: The Journals of Matthew Ricci, 1583–1610 (New York, 1953), 309–10.
67 G. de Magalhāes, A New History of the Empire of China (London, 1689).
68 A. Peyrefitte, The Immobile Empire (New York, 2013), xvii.
69 C.C. Chu, ‘Diplomatic quarter in Peiping’, University of Ottawa Ph.D. thesis, 1944, 112.
70 Arlington and Lewisohn, In Search of Old Peking, 5.
71 Xiaowu, ‘Xiantan’ (A chat), Xiandai pinglun (Modern Review), 4 (1926), 12–14, at 12.
72 Home, Of Planting and Planning, 117.
73 Qiuxingfuzhaizhu, ‘Dong Jiaomin Xiang suoji’ (A Record of East Jiaomin Lane), Ziluolan, 1 (1926), 1–5, at 1–2.
74 Moser and Moser, Foreigners within the Gates, 114.
75 Ibid., 115; G.N. Kates, The Years that Were Fat: The Last of Old China (Cambridge, 1967), 78.
76 J.C. Loeffler, The Architecture of Diplomacy: Building America's Embassies (New York, 1998), 17.
77 For more details on architectural transformation in the Legation Quarter, see F. Zhang, Beijing Jindai Jianzhushi (The Modern Architectural History of Beijing from the End of the Nineteenth Century to the 1930s) (Beijing, 2004), 68–86.
78 G. Collins, Extreme Oriental Mixture (London, 1925), 33.
79 Njoh, Planning Power, 122.
80 The Legation Quarter strongly influenced the surrounding area, especially the Inner First district, in terms of architecture, interests, habits and commerce, but hardly penetrated into more Chinese areas, even the Waiyiqu (Outer First District) to the south; see Duncan, Peiping Municipality, 32–3.
81 X. Zhang, Wenhua shiying yu zhongxin zhuangyi: Jinxiandai Shanghai kongjian bianqian de dushi renleixue yanjiu (The Cultural Adaptation and Shift of the City Centre: An Urban Anthropological Study of the Spatial Transformation of Modern Shanghai) (Nanjing, 2006), 12–13.
82 Qiuxingfuzhaizhu, ‘Dong Jiaomin Xiang suoji’, 3.
83 Gamble, Peking, 113.
84 Duncan, Peiping Municipality, 119, 146.
85 Borel, The New China, 72.
86 Duncan, Peiping Municipality, 112.
87 Mothers' Club of Peking, Peking Utility Book (Peking, 1921).
88 Fei, Zhongguo zujie shi, 1–9.
89 Gamble, Peking, 112.
90 X. Yu, ‘Beiping de gonggong weisheng’ (Public health in Beiping), in W. Li (ed.), Minguo shiqi shehui diaocha congbian: shehui baozhang juan (Social Surveys in Republican China: Social Welfare) (Fuzhou, 2004), 337–56, at 337.
91 Ibid., 338.
92 C. Zhang and Y. Liu, ‘International concessions and the modernization of Tianjin’, in Victoir and Zatsepine (eds.), Harbin to Hanoi, 83–102, at 100.
93 Beiping Government Secretariat, Beiping shi shizheng gongbao (Beiping Municipal Bulletin), 3 (1931), section on Zizhi (self-government), 3.
94 X. Huang, ‘Reforming Beijing in the shadow of colonial crisis: urban construction for competing with the foreign powers, 1900–1928’, in C. Hein (ed.), International Planning History Society Proceedings, 17th IPHS Conference, History Urbanism Resilience (Delft, 2016), 83–93.