Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-14T14:18:01.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Urban Decline in the Later Middle Ages: Some problems in interpreting the statistical data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2009

S. H. Rigby
S. H. Rigby
Affiliation:
Department of History, Bedford College, University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The medieval period is often regarded as part of the statistical ‘Dark Ages’ in English history before the nineteenth century. The figures which are available were mostly collected for immediate administrative or fiscal purposes far removed from the future needs of historians and by a state lacking the comprehensive administrative organization of a census-taking modern government. Medieval man in particular is usually thought to have had little concept of the meaning of high numbers. In 1371, for instance, the English parliament believed that there were 40,000 parishes in the country when in fact there were less than 9,000. Again, ‘when the pope was assured by his advisers that the Black Death had cost the lives of 42, 836, 486 throughout the world, or the losses in Germany were estimated at 1, 244, 434, what was meant was that an awful lot of people had died’. Estimates of total populations have of course been a famous source of controversy. ‘Medieval man like classical man before him was little interested in figures. Neither showed any desire to formulate a precise estimate of population, and when figures were called for they hazarded only the wildest guesses.’ Even for England, where more promising evidence survives than for any other country, Professor Postan concluded that it was not possible to measure the total size of the population at any given point of time. For 1086 for example, estimates of total population could have a ‘heroic’ margin of error of up to 150 per cent. Historians, he decided, should rather be concerned with the dynamics of medieval population than with global numbers.

Type
Research Article
Information
Urban History Yearbook , Volume 6 , May 1979 , pp. 46 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ziegler, P., The Black Death, (1971), 52.Google Scholar

2. Pounds, N. J. G., An Economic History of Medieval Europe, (1974), 123.Google Scholar

3. Postan, M. M., The Medieval Economy and Society, (1972), 27–31.Google Scholar

4. Carus-Wilson, E. M. and Coleman, O., England's Export Trade 1275–1547, (1963).Google Scholar

5. Schofield, R. S., ‘The geographical distribution of wealth in England 1334–1649’, Economic History Review, 2nd series xviii (1965), 483–510.Google Scholar

6. Ashley, W. J., An Introduction to English Economic History and Theory, Part II (1906), 50.Google Scholar

7. Cunningham, W., The Growth of English Industry and Commerce During the Early and Middle Ages (1910), 453;Google Scholar Postan, M. M., ‘The fifteenth century’, in Essays on Medieval Agriculture and General Problems of the Medieval Economy (1973), 44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8. Bridbury, A. R., Economic Growth: England in the Later Middle Ages (1962; 2nd edn 1975), Chapter V.Google Scholar Those who have accepted the conclusion that urban wealth constituted a larger proportion of total lay wealth in 1524 than in 1334 include Reynolds, S., An Introduction to the History of the English Medieval Town (1977), 146,Google Scholar and Baker, A. R. H., ‘Changes in the later Middle Ages’, in Darby, H. C. (ed.), A New Historical Geography of England before 1600 (1976), 241.Google Scholar

9. Ashley, op. cit., 50.

10. Willard, J. F., Parliamentary Taxes on Personal Property 1290 to 1334 (Cambridge, Mass., 1934), Chapter IV.Google Scholar

11. Ibid., 11–13. There was some mid-fifteenth-century relief from these assessments.

12. Dobson, R. B., ‘Urban decline in late medieval England’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 5th series, xxvii (1977), 18–19.Google Scholar

13. Bridbury's figure for the 1334 urban tax valuation for Lincolnshire presumably includes Lincoln (£1000), Boston (£1100), Stamford with Bredecroft (£395), and Grimsby (£97).

The £303 urban tax payment given for the county in 1524 apparently comprises Stamford (£90), Grimsby (£14), Boston (£73 in Appendix III), and Lincoln (£125 in Appendix III). In 1524 the suburb of Stamford Barron was included in the Stamford assessment (Public Record Office, E179/136/315), but in 1334 it had been separately assessed. Its 1334 valuation of £150 needs to be added to the total for this date while correct 1524–5 payments for Boston (£110 15s.) and Lincoln (£148 10s.) should be used. Glasscock, R. E. (ed.), The Lay Subsidy of 1334 (1975),Google Scholar gives a complete list of 1334 tax payments. Sheail, J., ‘The regional distribution of wealth in England as indicated in the Lay Subsidy Returns 1524–5’ (Ph.D thesis, University of London, 1968),Google Scholar lists the payments at the latter date. See also P. R. O. E179/136/311, E179/136/315, E179/136/313 and E359/41.

14. Willard, J. F., ‘Taxation boroughs and parliamentary boroughs in 1294–1336’, in Edwards, J. G., Galbraith, V. H. and Jacobs, E. F. (eds.), Historical Essays in honour of James Tait (1933), 417–35.Google Scholar

15. Glasscock, op. cit., 187, 319.

16. R. H. Glasscock, ‘England in 1334’, in Darby, op. cit., 179–83.

17. Schofield, op. cit.

18. ‘Suffolk in 1524’, Suffolk Green Books, X (1910), v–xi, 390–5,Google Scholar gives the form of this subsidy.

19. Hoskins, W. G., ‘English provincial towns in the early sixteenth century’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 5th series vi (1956), 3.Google Scholar

20. Schofield, op. cit., 492.

21. P.R.O., E179/136/310, E179/136/331, E179/136/311, E179/136/339.

22. Sheail, op. cit., 39–40.

23. P.R.O. Lay Subsidy E179/136/311.

24. Cornwall, J., ‘English county towns in the fifteen twenties’, Economic History Review, 2nd series, xv (1962–1963), 63.Google Scholar

25. Schofield, op. cit., 492, Cornwall, op. cit., 62–3, P.R.O. Lay Subsidy E179/136/311.

26. Sheail, op. cit., 42.

27. Glasscock, , The Lay Subsidy, 5.Google Scholar

28. Ibid., 3–4; Beresford, M. W. and Finberg, H. P. R., English Medieval Boroughs: A Handlist (1973), 66.Google Scholar

29. Godber, J., A History of Bedfordshire (1969), 121–2.Google Scholar Gaydon, A. T., ‘The taxation of 1297’, Bedfordshire Historical Record Society, xxxix (1959), xxi.Google Scholar

30. Godber, op. cit., 121. Glasscock, The Lay Subsidy, op. cit., 4.

31. Ibid., 172, 185.

32. See n. 13. P.R.O. E179/136/313, E179/136/339.

33. Hill, J. W. F., Medieval Lincoln (1948).Google Scholar

34. Gillett, E., A History of Grimsby (1970), 66.Google Scholar

35. Rogers, A. (ed.), The Making of Stamford (1965), 58–9.Google Scholar

36. Godber, op. cit., 155–6, 195–6.

37. Derby paid £30 in 1334, Chesterfield £7. Derby paid £32 in 1524, Chesterfield £8. Figures from Glasscock, The Lay Subsidy, and Sheail, op. cit.

38. Schofield, op. cit., 504.

39. See A Note on Statistics for the towns used. Glasscock, The Lay Subsidy, and Sheail, op. cit., for tax payments; Bridbury, op.cit, 81.

40. Schofield, op. cit., 507; Baker, op. cit., 195.

41. Dobson, op. cit., 18.

42. As we have seen, Dobson suggested such a 1334 urban under-valuation as previously did Hadwin, J. F., ‘Evidence on the possession of ‘treasure’ from the Lay Subsidy Rolls’, in Mayhew, N. J. (ed.),Google Scholar Edwardian Monetary Affairs 1279–1344, British Archaeological Reports 36 (1977):Google Scholar ‘Calculations of wealth (1334) per capita (1377) suggest…that most boroughs may have been undervalued compared with rural areas’ (162 n. 28; see also 164 n. 38, 152).

43. Phythian-Adams, C., ‘Urban decay in late medieval England’, in Abrams, P. A. and Wrigley, E. A. (eds), Towns in Societies (1978), 161.Google Scholar

44. Schofield, op. cit., 495.

45. Willard, , Parliamentary Taxes, 163–4.Google Scholar

46. This approach is taken by Hatcher, J., Plague, Population and the English Economy 1348–1530 (1977), 34–5.Google Scholar

47. Phythian-Adams, op. cit., 160.

48. Dobson, op. cit., 2; Bridbury, op. cit. 44.

49. Corfield, P., ‘Urban development in England and Wales in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries’, in Coleman, D. C. and John, A. H. (eds), Trade, Government and Economy in pre-Industrial England (1976), 240 n. 20.Google Scholar