No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
“Preserving the Name Alive” versus “Getting About”: Samuel Butler and the Problem of Memorial Sculpture
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 September 2022
Abstract
One of the most heated areas of discussion around monumental sculpture today is whether problematic past statues should be torn down. But what has been missing from conversations is a sense of prehistory: a sense, even among the monument-mad Victorians, that a time could come when statues from the past might adversely affect life in the present. From logistical concerns that too many statues would choke up flow through city streets, to concerns that effecting too many statues of unworthy people might take up limited space better saved for future worthies, to anxieties about visual distraction, plenty of commentators argued for a moratorium on new production. Others went further and proposed destruction. In his satirical 1872 work Erewhon, Samuel Butler would imagine a society that memorialized its dead not with gravestones but with life-size statues, and imagine a time when “the city had become so overrun with these pests, that there was no way of getting about.” He would also envision that the only solution was wholesale demolition. The scenario he sketched may have seemed one of the least hyperbolic of any in the novel, and the least foreign to his contemporaries.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Works Cited
“Abstracts of Important Public Acts.” British Almanac of the Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge. London, 1855.Google Scholar
Atkinson, J. Beavington. “The International Exhibition, 1862.” Art-Journal, November 1, 1862.Google Scholar
Burritt, Elihu. A Walk from London to Land's End and Back. London: Sampson Low, 1868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Samuel. Erewhon. 1872. Edited by Mudford, Peter. New York: Penguin Books, 1985.Google Scholar
Cherry, Deborah. “Statues in the Square: Hauntings at the Heart of Empire.” Art History 29, no. 4 (2006): 660–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Deborah. Household Goods: The British and Their Possessions. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
“College Green—The Vote of the Corporation.” Dublin Weekly Nation, February 27, 1864.Google Scholar
Culler, A. Dwight. “The Darwinian Revolution and Literary Form.” In The Art of Victorian Prose, edited by Levine, George and Madden, William, 224–46. New York: Oxford University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Danta, Chris. “Panpsychism and Speculative Evolutionary Aesthetic in Samuel Butler's ‘The Book of Machines.’” Textual Practice 35, no. 2 (2021): 285–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Droth, Martina, Edwards, Jason, and Hatt, Michael. “Sculpture and Commemoration.” In Sculpture Victorious: Art in the Age of Invention, 1837–1901, edited by Droth, Edwards, and Hatt, 340–68. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Dunstan, Angela. “Reading Victorian Sculpture.” 19: Interdisciplinary Studies in the Long Nineteenth Century 22 (2016). https://doi.org/10.16995/ntn.776.Google Scholar
Ellis, George. “The London Statue Mania.” Morning Advertiser, February 2, 1864.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. Edited by Strachey, James. 24 vols. London: Hogarth Press, 1953–74.Google Scholar
Getsy, David. Body Doubles: Sculpture in Britain, 1877–1905. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Gilmore, Dehn. The Victorian Novel and the Space of Art: Fictional Form on Display. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Gooch, Joshua. “Figures of Nineteenth-Century Biopower in Samuel Butler's Erewhon.” Nineteenth-Century Contexts 36 (2014): 53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haskell, Francis. Rediscoveries in Art: Some Aspects of Taste, Fashion and Collecting in England and France. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
“Havelock's Humble Petition.” Punch, June 1, 1861.Google Scholar
“Ireland.” Kendal Mercury, November 8, 1862.Google Scholar
“Justifiable Vandalism.” Reynolds's Newspaper, May 21, 1871.Google Scholar
“London Statues.” Meath People and Cavan and Westmeath Chronicle, May 12, 1860.Google Scholar
Mershon, Ella. “Decay, Scale and the Future of Victorian Organicism.” Victorian Studies 62, no. 2 (2020): 273–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Monumental Sculpture: Searcy and Drake.” Nottingham Journal, October 9, 1872.Google Scholar
“Monumental Sculpture: Westminster Abbey and St. Paul's.” Art Journal, October 1, 1854, 289–92.Google Scholar
Mudford, Peter. “Introduction” to Erewhon, by Butler, Samuel, 7–21. New York: Penguin, 1985.Google Scholar
“National Gallery Commission Moved For.” Parliamentary Debates 168 (July 8–August 7, 1862): 607–8.Google Scholar
“Our Public Statues.” Chambers's Journal, April 3, 1869.Google Scholar
Palgrave, Francis Turner. Handbook to the Fine Art Collections in the International Exhibition. London: Macmillan, 1862.Google Scholar
Palgrave, Francis Turner. “Public Statues in London.” Broadway Annual, 1867–1868, 525–27.Google Scholar
Parrinder, Patrick. “Entering Dystopia, Entering Erewhon.” Critical Survey 17 (2005): 6–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potts, Alex. “Eros in Piccadilly Circus: Monument and Anti-Monument.” In Sculpture and the Pursuit of the Modern Ideal in Britain c. 1880–1930, edited by Getsy, David, 105–39. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004.Google Scholar
“The Prince Consort's Memorial—The National Gallery.” Building News, August 1, 1862.Google Scholar
“The Proposed Statue to Sir John Franklin.” Nottingham Journal, September 21, 1860.Google Scholar
“Public Monuments.” Edinburgh Review, April 1862, 276–77.Google Scholar
“Public Monuments.” Edinburgh Review. Reprinted in Bedfordshire Times and Independent, May 27, 1862.Google Scholar
“Public Statues and Monuments.” Saturday Review, July 19, 1862, 77.Google Scholar
“Public Statues in London.” Parliamentary Debates 168 (August 1, 1862): 1085–88.Google Scholar
Remington, Thomas J. “‘The Mirror Up to Nature’: Reflections of Victorianism in Samuel Butler's Erewhon.” In No Place Else: Explorations in Utopian and Dystopian Fiction, edited by Greenburg, Martin H., Olander, Joseph D., and Rabkin, Erik S., 33–55. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Schama, Simon. “History Is Better Served by Putting the Men in Stone in Museums.” Financial Times, June 12, 2020, www.ft.com/content/1117dfb6-8e51-46ec-a74b-59973a96a85a.Google Scholar
“Sculpture at the Royal Academy.” The Era, June 16, 1861, 6.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Elinor. Erewhons of the Eye: Samuel Butler as Painter, Photographer and Art Critic. London: Reaktion Books, 1988.Google Scholar
Siegel, Jonah. Desire and Excess: The Nineteenth-Century Culture of Art. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Styles, David. “Black Lives Matter: Museum of London Supports Statue Removal,” Museums and Heritage Advisor, June 10 2020, https://advisor.museumsandheritage.com/news/black-lives-matter-museum-london-supports-statue-removal-firstsite-launches-public-campaign.Google Scholar
“Summary.” Sheffield Daily Telegraph, September 6, 1864.Google Scholar
Trollope, Anthony. The New Zealander. 1873. Ed. John Hall, N.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972.Google Scholar
“The Wellington Model Monument.” Punch, October 25, 1856, 168.Google Scholar