Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-04T20:06:56.172Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rethinking Propriety in the Age of Instantaneous Photography: E. W. Hornung's Camera Fiend

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2020

Susan Shelangoskie
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

E. W. Hornung's novel The Camera Fiend (1911) imagines a frighteningly extreme vision of photography. This text leverages an existing discourse about the camera fiend—an amateur photographer who intrudes on strangers to capture snapshots of vulnerable moments. I argue that an examination of Hornung's version of the camera fiend, including its conflation with the representation of the scientist, illuminates the logic of threatening liminality and monstrous synthesis in the relationship between photography and existing social conventions. The text also proposes a solution to these cultural fears by repairing social disruptions, but it does so at a cost that is untenable.

Type
Research Article
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 48 , Issue 4 , Winter 2020 , pp. 721 - 744
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

“Abdulla Cigarettes.” Sporting Times, 29 July 1911. British Newspaper Archive.Google Scholar
Avery, Simon. “‘A New Kind of Rays’: Gothic Fears, Cultural Anxieties and the Discovery of X-Rays in the 1890s.” Gothic Studies 17, no. 1 (2015): 61–75.Google Scholar
The Bard. “Lancashire v. Glamorgan.” Athletic News, 20 March 1893. British Newspaper Archive.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography. Translated by Richard Howard. New York: Hill & Wang, 1981.Google Scholar
“Bathing-Machines at Ostend—The King of Spain's Bathing-Box—Camera Fiends—Sand Castles.” The Sketch, 18 September 1907. British Newspaper Archive.Google Scholar
Beer, Gillian. “‘Authentic Tidings of Invisible Things’: Vision and the Invisible in the Later Nineteenth Century.” In Vision in Context: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives on Sight, edited by Brennan, Teresa and Jay, Martin, 83–100. New York: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
Berkley, Angela. “Snapshot Seeing: Kodak Fiends, Child Photographers, and Henry James's ‘What Maisie Knew.’” MFS: Modern Fiction Studies 61, no. 3 (2015): 375–403.Google Scholar
Berman, Bob. Zapped: From Infrared to X-Rays, the Curious History of Invisible Light. New York: Little, Brown, 2017.Google Scholar
“The Camera and Its Uses.” Nottingham Journal, 21 June 1900. British Newspaper Archive.Google Scholar
“[Camera Club].” Northern Whig, 17 September 1894. British Newspaper Archive.Google Scholar
“Camera ‘Fiend’ at a Millionaire's Wedding.” Globe, 12 June 1908. British Newspaper Archive.Google Scholar
“Camera Fiend: Committee of Physical Violence.” Dundee Evening Post, 4 August 1900. British Newspaper Archive.Google Scholar
“Camera Fiends.” Birmingham Daily Gazette, 26 February 1906. British Newspaper Archive.Google Scholar
“Chips.” Daily Gazette for Middlesbrough, 5 February 1896. British Newspaper Archive.Google Scholar
Curtiss, F. H. “The Camera Fiend.” Hampshire Telegraph, 28 September 1889. British Newspaper Archive.Google Scholar
De Valcourt, Robert. The Illustrated Manners Book: A Manual of Good Behavior and Polite Accomplishments. New York: Leland, Clay, 1855. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/hvd.32044009632134.Google Scholar
“The Domestic Detective.” Clifton Society, 20 September 1900. British Newspaper Archive.Google Scholar
“Fashions and Fancies.” Globe, 24 August 1899. British Newspaper Archive.Google Scholar
“Fatal Motor-Race on the Brooklands Track.” Illustrated London News, 21 September 1907. British Newspaper Archive.Google Scholar
“Fiend, n.” OED Online. Oxford University Press. www.oed.com/view/Entry/69955 (accessed 12 May 2018).Google Scholar
Gitelman, Lisa. Always Already New: Media, History and the Data of Culture. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2006.Google Scholar
“Gossip of the Hour.” The Tatler, 10 August 1904. British Newspaper Archive.Google Scholar
Gunning, Tom. “Embarrassing Evidence: The Detective Camera and the Documentary Impulse.” In Collecting Visible Evidence, edited by Gaines, Jane M. and Renov, Michael, 46–64. Vol. 6 of Visible Evidence. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Gunning, Tom. “Re-Newing Old Technologies: Astonishment, Second Nature, and the Uncanny in Technology from the Previous Turn-of-the-Century.” In Rethinking Media Change: The Aesthetics of Transition, edited by Thorburn, David, Jenkins, Henry, and Seawell, Brad, 39–60. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Angus. “Off with Their Heads!” Pall Mall Gazette, 15 May 1901. British Newspaper Archive.Google Scholar
Hartley, Florence. Ladies’ Book of Etiquette, and Manual of Politeness: A Complete Handbook for the Use of the Lady in Polite Society. London: Lee & Shepard, 1872.Google Scholar
“Have You Met the Camera Fiend?” London Daily News, 22 February 1911. British Newspaper Archive.Google Scholar
Hedley, Alison. “Advertisements, Hyper-Reading, and Fin de Siècle Consumer Culture in the Illustrated London News and the Graphic.” Victorian Periodicals Review 51, no. 1 (2018): 138–67.10.1353/vpr.2018.0006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornung, E. W. The Camera Fiend. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1911.Google Scholar
Igo, Sarah Elizabeth. The Known Citizen: A History of Privacy in Modern America. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jastrow, Joseph. “Composite Portraiture.” Science 6, no. 134 (1885): 165–67.10.1126/science.ns-6.134.165CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeffreys-Jones, Rhodri. We Know All about You: The Story of Surveillance in Britain and America. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
“Jottings.” Coleraine Chronicle, 21 September 1907. British Newspaper Archive.Google Scholar
Linkman, Audrey. Photography and Death. London: Reaktion Books, 2011.Google Scholar
“Long Distance Cycling.” Sporting Life, 14 June 1897. British Newspaper Archive.Google Scholar
Marvin, Carolyn. When Old Technologies Were New: Thinking about Communications in the Late Nineteenth Century. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
McKenzie, Jai. Light and Photomedia: A New History and Future of the Photographic Image. International Library of Visual Culture 8. London: I. B. Tauris, 2014.Google Scholar
Mensel, R. E. “‘Kodakers Lying in the Wait’: Amateur Photography and the Right of Privacy in New York, 1885–1915.” American Quarterly 43, no. 1 (1991): 24–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, Julia F. “‘The Optical Stranger’: Photographic Anxieties in British Periodical Literature of the 1840s and Early 1850s.” Early Popular Visual Culture 7, no. 2 (2009): 167–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“New Kodaks.” The Graphic, 5 April 1890. British Newspaper Archive.Google Scholar
“New Serial: The Camera Fiend.” Pearson's Weekly, 24 November 1910. British Newspaper Archive.Google Scholar
“News in Brief.” South Wales Daily News, 9 September 1895. British Newspaper Archive.Google Scholar
“Notes on News.” Yorkshire Evening Post, 5 March 1894. British Newspaper Archive.Google Scholar
Novak, Daniel A. “Caught in the Act: Photography on the Victorian Stage.” Victorian Studies: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Social, Political, and Cultural Studies 59, no. 1 (2016): 35–64.Google Scholar
“Occasional Notes: The Camera Fiend.” Pall Mall Gazette, 16 September 1907. British Newspaper Archive.Google Scholar
“Photographia.” Greenock Telegraph and Clyde Shipping Gazette, 3 April 1902. British Newspaper Archive.Google Scholar
“Photographic Maniacs.” Yorkshire Evening Post, 16 September 1907. British Newspaper Archive.Google Scholar
Prodger, Phillip. Time Stands Still: Muybridge and the Instantaneous Photography Movement. New York: Iris & B. Gerald Cantor Center for Visual Arts at Stanford University in association with Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Pupin, M. I. “Röntgen Rays.” Science 3, no. 59 (14 February 1896): 231–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puskar, Jason. “Pistolgraphs: Liberal Technoagency and the Nineteenth-Century Camera Gun.” Nineteenth-Century Contexts 36, no. 5 (2014): 517–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The Referee's Note Book.” Scottish Referee, 20 June 1892. British Newspaper Archive.Google Scholar
Röntgen, W. C. “On a New Kind of Rays.” Science 3, no. 59 (14 February 1896): 227–31.Google Scholar
Schivelbusch, Wolfgang. The Railway Journey: The Industrialization of Time and Space in the Nineteenth Century. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelangoskie, Susan. “Domesticity in the Darkroom: Photographic Process and Victorian Romantic Narratives.” LIT: Literature Interpretation Theory 24, no. 2 (2013): 93–111.Google Scholar
Shelangoskie, Susan. “‘Nerves of the Empire’: Rhetorical and Literary Strategies in Submarine Telegraph Technological Travel Narratives.” In Britain and the Narration of Travel in the Nineteenth Century, edited by Hill, Kate, 91–108. London: Ashgate, 2016.Google Scholar
Sontag, Susan. On Photography. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1977.Google Scholar
Tagg, John. Grounds of Dispute: Art History, Cultural Politics, and the Discursive Field. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Those Camera Fiends.” Glasgow Evening Post, 13 July 1892. British Newspaper Archive.Google Scholar
“[To have your bones photographed . . .].” Sheffield Weekly Telegraph, 14 March 1896. British Newspaper Archive.Google Scholar
Warren, Samuel D., and Brandeis, Louis D.. “The Right to Privacy.” Harvard Law Review 4, no. 5 (1890): 193–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, Nancy Martha. Kodak and the Lens of Nostalgia. Cultural Frames, Framing Culture. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 2000.Google Scholar
[What Are We Coming To?]. The Sketch, 5 February 1896. British Newspaper Archive.Google Scholar