Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T12:22:09.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Democracy and Popular Culture Before Reform

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Extract

The theatricality of modern politics is an axiom available to every headline writer, every talk show host, and every college professor. National and international politics have become a branch of theater which is a branch of advertising. And most people who bother to note this commonplace complain about it. With the presidency of a movie actor, the headline writers have tended more and more to acknowledge the metaphor that animates their own activity. The press with its words and pictures, the newsreel, and then television have very self-consciously assumed the function of the stage in this century. Politicians step in as its actors while ad agencies produce, and we the people quietly sequestered in our living rooms play an uneasy role as a dispersed and silent audience, the weakest component of a global metaphor that has been with us at least since Shakespeare's time.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

“Barnum for President.” Punch 1 September 1855, 89.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. Reflections on the Revolution in France. London: Oxford UP, 1950.Google Scholar
Butwin, Joseph. “The French Revolution as Theatrum Mundi.” Research Studies 43 (1975): 141–52.Google Scholar
Butwin, Joseph. “Seditious Laughter.” Radical History Review 18 (1978): 1734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobbett, William, ed. Political Register. London.Google Scholar
Cobbett, William, Rural Rides. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1963.Google Scholar
“For Soviets the summit's a sideshow: Their reforms upstage Reagan.” Seattle Post-Intelligencer, 28 05 1988.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage, 1979.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. Negara: The Theatre State in Nineteenth Century Bali. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1980.Google Scholar
Hazlitt, William. Complete Works. Ed. Howe, P.P.. London: E.P. Dutton, 1930.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. J.The Age of Capital: 1848–1875. New York: Scribner's, 1975.Google Scholar
Hone, William. The Every-Day Book. London: Thomas Tegg, 1838.Google Scholar
Hone, William. Official Account [of the] Bartholomew Fair Insurrection, n.d.Google Scholar
Hone, William. The Political Showman – At Home! London: William Hone, 1821.Google Scholar
Hone, William. ed. Reformists' Register. London.Google Scholar
Illustrated London News Supplement. London 21 08 1852.Google Scholar
Laqueur, Thomas W.The Queen Caroline Affair: Politics as Art in the Reign of George IV.” Journal of Modern History 54 (1982): 417–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Edmund S.Inventing the People: The Rise of Popular Sovereignty in England and America. New York: Norton, 1988.Google Scholar
Paine, Thomas. Rights of Man. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1983.Google Scholar
Place, Francis. Place Papers. British Library. Add. Mss. Scourge 09 1813.Google Scholar
Thompson, E.P.The Making of the English Working Class. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1975.Google Scholar
Toqueville, Alexis de. Democracy in America. New York: Vintage, 1945.Google Scholar
Wooler, Thomas, ed. Black Dwarf. London.Google Scholar
Yates, Frances A.Theater of the World. Chicago: U of Chicago, 1969.Google Scholar