Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-l82ql Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T07:08:20.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Illiberalism and the Exception in George Eliot's Early Writing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2019

Neal Carroll
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Over the past two decades, studies of the Victorian novel have been enriched significantly by a growing body of scholarship looking to the literature and letters of the period to affirm for the twenty-first century the theoretical and practical value of liberal conceptualizations of critical detachment and communicative decision-making procedures. In the process, the works of George Eliot (1819–1880) have come to be understood not only as modeling forms of critical detachment and rational decision-making but also as important contributors to what Amanda Anderson has identified as “the emergence of the [Habermasian] public sphere in Enlightenment Europe, a historical condition in which critique, argument, and debate inform developing political practices and institutions,” which “helped to consolidate … the legitimating force of public opinion and the rule of law, the successor to now delegitimated forms of absolute sovereignty.” However, I will argue here that Eliot's early writing in particular demonstrates a distinct lack of faith in the power of liberalism and its political procedures and that Eliot's early work in fact exposes the illiberal tendencies embedded in these procedures. Rather than asserting the authority of the public sphere, Eliot's important early novels Adam Bede (1859) and The Mill on the Floss (1860) consistently look beyond themselves, so to speak, to a providential authority that exceeds the tenets of realism in their efforts to resolve conflict and provide closure to the novels. For each novel, aesthetic coherence is secured not through “critique, argument, and debate” but through recourse to metaphysics and to extrasocial and/or extraprocedural decisions. In the following pages I align this phenomenon in Eliot's early writing with the controversial German legal scholar Carl Schmitt's concept of the exception in order to argue that, by appealing to the logic of providence to resolve their most intractable legal and ethical problems, these early novels in fact demonstrate Eliot's awareness of the practical limitations of proceduralism as a legitimate decision-making instrument.

Type
Research Article
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , Summer 2019 , pp. 377 - 407
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Agamben, Giorgio. State of Exception. Translated by Attell., Kevin Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Anderson, Amanda. The Powers of Distance: Cosmopolitanism and the Cultivation of Detachment. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Anderson, Amanda. The Way We Argue Now: A Study in the Cultures of Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Nancy. How Novels Think: The Limits of British Individualism from 1719–1900. New York: Columbia University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Arnold, Matthew. Culture and Anarchy and Other Writings. 1869. Edited by Collini, Stefan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Ashton, Rosemary. The Mill on the Floss: A Natural History. Boston: Twayne, 1990.Google Scholar
Beer, Gillian. “George Eliot and the Novel of Ideas.” In The Columbia History of the British Novel, edited by Richetti, John, 429–55. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. New York: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. “Critique of Violence.” In Reflections: Essays, Aphorisms, Autobiographical Writings, edited by Demetz, Peter, translated by Jephcott, Edmund, 277–300. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1978.Google Scholar
Blumenberg, Hans. The Legitimacy of the Modern Age. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Carroll, David. George Eliot and the Conflict of Interpretations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Eliot, George. Adam Bede. 1859. Edited by Reynolds, Margaret. New York: Penguin, 2008.Google Scholar
Eliot, George. “Address to Working Men, by Felix Holt.” In Felix Holt the Radical, edited by Mugglestone, Linda, 483–99. New York: Penguin, 1995.Google Scholar
Eliot, George. “The Antigone and Its Moral.” In Selected Essays, Poems and Other Writings, edited by Byatt, A. S. and Warren, Nicholas, 363–78. New York: Penguin, 1990.Google Scholar
Eliot, George. Daniel Deronda. 1876. Edited by Handley, Grantham. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Eliot, George. Felix Holt: The Radical. 1866. Edited by Mugglestone, Linda. New York: Penguin, 1995.Google Scholar
Eliot, George. The Mill on the Floss. 1860. Edited by Byatt, A. S.. New York: Penguin, 1985.Google Scholar
Eliot, George. “The Natural History of German Life.” In Selected Essays, Poems and Other Writings, edited by Byatt, A .S. and Warren, Nicholas, 107–39. New York: Penguin, 1990.Google Scholar
Eliot, George. Silas Marner. 1861. Edited by Carroll, David. New York: Penguin, 1996.Google Scholar
Evans, Meredith. “Cosmopolitics and Its Sadian Discontents.” In Cosmopolitics and the Emergence of a Future, edited by Morgan, Diane and Banham, Gary, 69–90. New York: Palgrave, 2007.Google Scholar
Frye, Northrop. The Secular Scripture: A Study of the Structure of Romance. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Goodlad, Lauren M. E. Victorian Literature and the Victorian State: Character and Governance in a Liberal Society. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. “On the Relation between the Secular Liberal State and Religion.” Translated by Fritsch, Matthias. In The Frankfurt School on Religion: Key Writings by the Major Thinkers, edited by Mendieta, Eduardo, 339–48. New York: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Hadley, Elaine. Living Liberalism: Practical Citizenship in Mid-Victorian Britain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Kahn, Victoria. “Hamlet or Hecuba: Carl Schmitt's Decision.” Representations 83, no. 1 (2003): 67–96.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren. Either/Or, a Fragment of Life. 1843. In The Essential Kierkegaard, edited by Hong, Howard V. and Hong, Edna H., 37–83. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren. Fear and Trembling; Repetition. 1843. Edited by Hong, Howard V. and Hong, Edna H., 1–124. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Lewis, Pericles. Modernism, Nationalism, and the Novel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Malachuk, Daniel. “George Eliot's Liberalism.” In A Companion to George Eliot, edited by Anderson, Amanda and Shaw, Harry E., 370–84. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013.Google Scholar
Malachuk, Daniel. “National Cosmopolitics in the Nineteenth Century.” In Cosmopolitics and the Emergence of a Future, edited by Morgan, Diane and Banham, Gary, 139–62. New York: Palgrave, 2007.Google Scholar
Malachuk, Daniel. “Romola and Victorian Liberalism.” Victorian Literature and Culture 36, no. 1 (2008): 41–57.Google Scholar
Martin, Bruce K. “Rescue and Marriage in Adam Bede.” Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900 12, no. 4 (1972): 745–63.Google Scholar
McCaw, Neil. George Eliot and Victorian Historiography: Imagining the National Past. New York: St. Martin's, 2000.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. On Liberty. 1859. In On Liberty and The Subjection of Women, edited by Ryan, Alan, 3–129. New York: Penguin, 2006.Google Scholar
Miller, D. A. The Novel and the Police. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Miller, J. Hillis. Others. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Pecora, Vincent P. Secularization and Cultural Criticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. “The Age of Neutralizations and Depoliticizations.” Translated by Konzen, Matthias and McCormick., John P. In The Concept of the Political, edited by Schwab, George, 80–96. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. The Concept of the Political. Translated by Schwab, George. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. Political Romanticism. Translated by Oakes, Guy. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Translated by Schwab, George. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Thomas, David Wayne. Cultivating Victorians: Liberal Culture and the Aesthetic. Philadelphia : University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Tucker, Irene. A Probable State: The Novel, the Contract, and the Jews. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Vance, Norman. Bible and Novel: Narrative Authority and the Death of God. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Van Ghent, Dorothy Bendon. The English Novel, Form and Function. New York: Rinehart, 1953.Google Scholar
Vargish, Thomas. The Providential Aesthetic in Victorian Fiction. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1985.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: The Free Press, 1964.Google Scholar
White, Hayden. The Content of the Form. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987.Google Scholar