Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T03:06:29.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SILKWORMS AND SHIPWRECKS: SUSTAINABILITY IN DOMBEY AND SON

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2016

Wendy Parkins
Wendy Parkins*
Affiliation:
University of Kent
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Seeking to prepare her friend Lucretia Tox for the revelation of Mr Dombey's engagement, Louisa Chick, Dombey's sister, turns to the natural world to illustrate the inevitability of change:

It's a world of change. . . .Why, my gracious me, what is there that does not change! Even the silkworm, who I am sure might be supposed not to trouble itself about such subjects, changes into all sorts of unexpected things continually. (434; ch. 29)

For Mrs Chick, the silkworm seems to exemplify the truism that change is a natural and inevitable part of life but, in the context of global sericulture, her example is perhaps more apposite than she realizes. Silk production not only radically terminates the natural metamorphosis from caterpillar to moth, it also constitutes an industry subject to the volatilities of global trade and regulation, the cycles of fashion, the impact of new technologies, not to mention the vagaries of disease, climate and habitat. While Britain had been importing raw silk from China in limited supplies from the eighteenth century onwards, by the time Dombey and Son was written, the devastation of sericultural crops in France and Italy by a disease which had been spreading since the 1820s allowed Britain to benefit from the treaty port system (established as a result of the Opium Wars) and re-export raw silk to the Continent (Ma 332–3). Thus, silk – circulating around the world, and linking producers of the raw material in India, China, or Japan with child labourers in Macclesfield, handloom weavers in Spitalfields, textile designers in France, and wealthy consumers in London – positions the humble silkworm within complex and dynamic networks of uncertain sustainability.

Type
Research Article
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , September 2016 , pp. 455 - 471
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Alaimo, Stacy. “Sustainable This, Sustainable That: New Materialisms, Posthumanisms, and Unknown Futures.” PMLA 127.3 (2012): 558–64.Google Scholar
Bate, Jonathan. “Living with the Weather.” Studies in Romanticism 35.3 (1996): 431–47.Google Scholar
Bauman, Zygmunt. Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity, 2000.Google Scholar
Braidotti, Rosi. Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory. 2nd ed. New York: Columbia UP, 2011.Google Scholar
Braidotti, Rosi. Transpositions: On Nomadic Ethics. Cambridge: Polity, 2006.Google Scholar
Brayton, Dan. Shakespeare's Ocean: An Ecocritical Exploration. Charlottesville: U of Virginia P, 2012.Google Scholar
Buckland, Adelene. “The Poetry of Science: Charles Dickens, Geology, and Visual and Material Culture in Victorian London.” Victorian Literature and Culture 35 (2007): 679–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Tina. “Writing the Victorian City: Discourses of Risk, Connection and Inevitability.” Victorian Studies 43.4 (2001): 561–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Robert. “Riddling the Family Firm: The Sexual Economy in Dombey and Son .” ELH 51.1 (1984): 69–84.Google Scholar
Clements, Colleen D. “Stasis: The Unnatural Value.” Environmental Ethics. Ed. Elliot, R.. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1995: 215–25.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. Dombey and Son. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2008.Google Scholar
Forster, John. The Life of Charles Dickens. Vol. 2. London: Dent, 1966.Google Scholar
Freedgood, Elaine. The Ideas in Things: Fugitive Meaning in the Victorian Novel. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2006.Google Scholar
Garrard, Greg. Ecocriticism. 2nd ed. Abingdon: Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar
Gold, Barri J. “Energy, Ecology, and Victorian Fiction.” Literature Compass 9.2 (2012): 213–24.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm, 2003.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. How Like a Leaf: An Interview with Thyrza Nichols Goodeve. New York: Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar
Keller, Lynn. “Beyond Imagining, Imagining Beyond.” PMLA 127.3 (2012): 579–85.Google Scholar
King, Amy M. Bloom: The Botanical Vernacular in the English Novel. New York: Oxford UP, 2003.Google Scholar
King, Brenda M. Silk and Empire. Manchester: Manchester UP, 2005.Google Scholar
Landow, George P. Images of Crisis: Literary Iconology, 1750 to the Present. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1982.Google Scholar
Levine, Caroline. “Narrative Networks: Bleak House and the Affordances of Form.” Novel: A Forum on Fiction 42.3 (2009): 517–23.Google Scholar
Levine, George. Darwin and the Novelists: Patterns of Science in Victorian Fiction. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1991.Google Scholar
Lynch, Deidre Shauna. “‘Young Ladies are Delicate Plants’: Jane Austen and Greenhouse Romanticism.” ELH 77.3 (2010): 689–729.Google Scholar
Ma, Debin. “The Modern Silk Road: The Global Raw-Silk Market, 1850-1930.” Journal of Economic History 56.2 (1996): 330–55.Google Scholar
MacDuffie, Allen. Victorian Literature, Energy, and the Ecological Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2014.Google Scholar
Marcus, Steven. Dickens: From Pickwick to Dombey. London: Chatto and Windus, 1965.Google Scholar
Mentz, Steve. “After Sustainability.” PMLA 127.3 (2012): 586–92.Google Scholar
Moynahan, Julian. “Dealings with the Firm of Dombey and Son: Firmness versus Wetness.” Dickens and the Twentieth Century. Ed. Gross, John and Pearson, Gabriel. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1962. 121–31.Google Scholar
Nunokawa, Jeff. The Afterlife of Property: Domestic Security and the Victorian Novel. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2003.Google Scholar
O'Grady, John. ‘How Sustainable is the Idea of Sustainability?” Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment 10.1 (2003): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parham, John. “Dickens in the City: Science, Technology, Ecology in the Novels of Charles Dickens.” 19: Interdisciplinary Studies in the Long Nineteenth Century 10 (2010). Web. 6 May 2015.Google Scholar
Perera, Suvendrini. “Wholesale, Retail and for Exportation: Empire and the Family Business in Dombey and Son .” Victorian Studies 33.4 (1990): 603–20.Google Scholar
Royle, Stephen A. “ Perilous Shipwreck, Misery and Unhappiness: The British Military at Tristan da Cuhna, 1816-1817.” Journal of Historical Geography 29.4 (2003): 516–34.Google Scholar
Schor, Hilary M. Dickens and the Daughter of the House. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shuttleworth, Sally. The Mind of the Child: Child Development in Literature, Science, and Medicine, 1840-1900. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Jesse Oak. “The Novel as Climate Model: Realism and the Greenhouse Effect in Bleak House .” Novel: A Forum on Fiction 46.1 (2013): 1–25.Google Scholar
Toise David W. “‘As Good as Nowhere’: Dickens's Dombey and Son, the Contingency of Value, and Theories of Domesticity.” Criticism 41.3 (1999): 323–48.Google Scholar
Thompson, Carl, ed. Shipwreck in Art and Literature: Images and Interpretations from Antiquity to the Present Day. New York: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar
Winter, James. Secure from Rash Assault: Sustaining the Victorian Environment. Berkeley: U of California P, 1999.Google Scholar
Wood, Gillen D'Arcy. “What is Sustainability Studies?” American Literary History 24.1 (2011): 1–15.Google Scholar