Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T20:20:22.002Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“SKINS TO JUMP INTO”: THE SLIPPERINESS OF IDENTITY AND THE BODY IN WILKIE COLLINS'S NO NAME

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2012

Kylee-Anne Hingston*
Affiliation:
University of Victoria

Extract

Victorian sensation literature was inextricably related to identity and the body: its primary purposes were to elicit a physical response from the senses of readers and to question “the social formation of the self” (Taylor, The Secret 2). Sensation fiction regularly relied on different, deformed, or diseased bodies to provoke fear or unease in its readers, and it created anxiety by juxtaposing the domestic with scandal, crime, and Gothicism to disturb the perceived stability of the home and social identity. Lyn Pykett argues that the genre reproduces the “real mid-nineteenth-century anxiety” that domestic selfhood “could be disrupted by danger, death or disease on the one hand, and the vagaries of the law, the banking system or the stockmarket on the other” (“Collins” 59). Nineteenth-century critics’ reactions to sensation novels connected anxieties about the body to fears about the instability of social identity: contemporary reviews described sensation literature and its works as “feverish” (Smith 141), “a collective cultural nervous disorder” (Taylor, The Secret 4), and as “symptoms of . . . social disease” (Pykett, “Collins” 51). In his 1880–81 series of essays, “Fiction Fair and Foul,” John Ruskin argues that the “[p]hysically diseased, ‘deformed,’ and ignobly dead bodies [in Collins's and Dickens's novels] are symptomatic of diseased and deformed genres, produced by morally and physically ill writers to cater to the tastes of morally and physically diseased urban readers” (Holmes, Fictions 92). These extreme critical responses, as well as the extreme popularity of sensation fiction, call attention to Victorian preoccupation with the body and social identity and with the instability of both. This paper, through analyzing the instability of bodies and identities in Wilkie Collins's sensation novel No Name (1862) and its serial context, challenges readings by both Victorian and more recent critics that distinctly interpret diseased and disabled bodies in the novel as either symbolic of or a result of social deviance.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Bailin, Miriam. The Sickroom in Victorian Fiction: The Art of Being Ill. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogdan, Robert. “The Social Construction of ‘Freaks.’” Freakery: Cultural Spectacles of the Extraordinary Body. Ed. Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie. New York: New York UP, 1996. 2337. Google Book Search. Web. 15 Oct. 2010.Google Scholar
Brantlinger, Patrick. “What is ‘Sensational’ about the ‘Sensation Novel’?” Pykett 30–57.Google Scholar
Chorley, H. F. “Unsigned Review.” Athenaeum 3 Jan. 1863: 10–11. Rpt. in Wilkie Collins: The Critical Heritage. Ed. Norman Page. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1974. 131–33.Google Scholar
Collins, Wilkie. No Name. 1862. Ed. Blain, Virginia. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2008.Google Scholar
Collins, Wilkie. No Name. All the Year Round 15 Mar. 1862 to 17 Jan. 1863.Google Scholar
Collins, Wilkie. No Name. Harper's Weekly. 15 Mar. 1862 to 24 Jan. 1863. Surridge. Web. 8 Oct. 2008.Google Scholar
“Coming into a Fortune.” All the Year Round 20 Dec. 1862: 354–55. Google Book Search. Web. 20 Nov. 2008.Google Scholar
Cornes, Judy. Madness and the Loss of Identity in Nineteenth Century Fiction. Jefferson: McFarland, 2008.Google Scholar
David, Deirdre. “Rewriting the Male Plot in Wilkie Collin's No Name.” Pykett 136–48.Google Scholar
Davis, Lennard J.Bending Over Backwards: Disability, Dismodernism, and Other Difficult Positions. New York: New York UP, 2002.Google Scholar
“Do You Want Luxurious Whiskers or Mustaches?” Advertisement. Harper's Weekly 22 Mar. 1862: 191. Surridge. Web. 8 Oct. 2008.Google Scholar
Flint, Kate. “Disability and Difference.” Taylor 153–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulford, Tim. “Romanticizing the Empire: The Naval Heroes of Southey, Coleridge, Austen, and Marryat.” MLQ 60.2 (1999): 161–96. Web. 4 Dec. 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grubbs, Gerald Giles. “The Editorial Policies of Charles Dickens.” PMLA 58.4 (1943): 1110–24. Web. 15 Nov. 2010.Google Scholar
Harper's Weekly. 15 Mar. 1862 to 24 Jan. 1863. HarpWeek. Ed. John Adler. Web. 26 Feb. 2009.Google Scholar
Herndl, Diane Price. Invalid Women: Figuring Feminine Illness in American Fiction and Culture, 1840–1940. Chapel Hill: U of North Carolina P, 1993.Google Scholar
Holmes, Martha Stoddard. “‘Bolder with Her Lover in the Dark’: Collins and Disabled Women's Sexuality.” Reality's Dark Light: The Sensational Wilkie Collins. Ed. Maria K. Bachman and Don Richard Cox. Tennessee Studies in Literature Vol. 41. Knoxville: U of Tennessee P, 2003. 59–93.Google Scholar
Holmes, Martha Stoddard. Fictions of Affliction: Physical Disability in Victorian Culture. The Corporealities Series. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Linda K., and Lund, Michael. The Victorian Serial. Charlottesville: UP of Virginia, 1991.Google Scholar
McLenan, John, Illus. No Name. Wilkie Collins. Harper's Weekly 15 Mar. 1862 to 24 Jan. 1863. Surridge. Web. 8 Oct. 2008.Google Scholar
Mitchell, David T., and Snyder, Sharon L.. Narrative Prosthesis: Disability and the Dependencies of Discourse. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 2000.Google Scholar
Oliphant, Margaret. “Sensation Novels.” Blackwood's Magazine May 1862: 564–84. The Internet Library of Early Journals. U of Birmingham, Leeds, Manchester and Oxford. Web. 20 Nov. 2008.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Philip. Wilkie Collins: Women, Property and Propriety. Totowa: Barnes & Noble Books, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Pinchback's Amusements.” All the Year Round 31 Mar. 1862: 71–72.Google Scholar
“Pinchback's Cottage.” All the Year Round 24 Mar. 1862: 31–34.Google Scholar
“Princely Travel in America.” All the Year Round 1 Nov. 1862: 174–80. Web. Google Books. 11 Jan. 2011.Google Scholar
Pykett, Lyn. “Collins and the sensation novel.” Taylor 50–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pykett, Lyn. The Sensation Novel from The Woman in White to The Moonstone. Northcote House with the British Council: Plymouth, 1994.Google Scholar
Pykett, Lyn, ed. Wilkie Collins: Contemporary Critical Essays. New York: St. Martin's P, 1998.Google Scholar
Rance, Nicholas. Wilkie Collins and Other Sensation Novelists: Walking the Moral Hospital. London: MacMillan Academic and Professional, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruskin, John. “Fiction – Fair and Foul.” The Nineteenth Century: A Monthly Review 7 (June 1880): 941–62. Literary Theory Full-Text Database. Web. 6 April 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Alexander. “Unsigned Review.” North British Review Feb. 1863: 183–85. Rpt. in Wilkie Collins: The Critical Heritage. Ed. Norman Page. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1974. 140–42.Google Scholar
“Soldiers’ Leisure.” All the Year Round 19 Apr. 1862: 125–28.Google Scholar
Surridge, Lisa, ed. “No Name in Harper's Weekly.” UVicMoodle Course 200809 Eng 550. Web. 8 Oct. 2008.Google Scholar
Talairach-Vielmas, Laurence. Moulding the Female Body in Victorian Fairy Tales and Sensation Novels. Hampshire: Ashgate, 2007.Google Scholar
Taylor, Jenny Bourne. In the Secret Theatre of Home. London: Routledge, 1988.Google Scholar
Jenny Bourne, Taylor, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Wilkie Collins. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2006.Google Scholar
Thomson, Rosemarie Garland. Extraordinary Bodies: Figuring Physical Disability in American Culture and Literature. New York: Columbia UP, 1997.Google Scholar
“To the Nervous and Debilitated.” Advertisement. Harper's Weekly 22 Mar. 1862: 191. Surridge. Web. 8 Oct. 2008.Google Scholar
“Two Works.” Advertisement. Harper's Weekly 14 Jun. 1862: 383. Surridge. Web. 8 Oct. 2008.Google Scholar
“Unsigned Review.” Saturday Review 17 Jan. 1863: 84–85. Rpt. in Wilkie Collins: The Critical Heritage. Ed. Norman Page. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1974. 136–37.Google Scholar
Wagner, Tamara S.‘Overpowering Vitality’: Nostalgia and Men of Sensibility in the Fiction of Wilkie Collins.” MLQ 63.4 (2002): 471500. Web. 6 Nov. 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynne, Deborah. The Sensation Novel and the Victorian Family Magazine. Houndmills: Palgrave, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar