Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T02:27:09.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Victorian Plants: Cosmopolitan and Invasive

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2021

Lynn Voskuil Open the ORCID record for Lynn Voskuil [Opens in a new window]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The terms “cosmopolitan” and “invasive” name ideas that have long figured prominently in the practices, the methods, and the unexamined assumptions of Victorian studies. These categories also shape the study of plants, both now and in the nineteenth century, along with related terms like “native,” “exotic,” and “hybrid.” “Invasion biology,” for example, currently describes the study of how nonnative species spread around the world, and the phrase “nativism-cosmopolitanism dichotomy” has been used to describe the impasse between different approaches to global plant distribution and migration. This paper will put these variable disciplinary conceptions of “cosmopolitan” and “invasive” into conversation with each other, offering a methodological reflection with the goal of clarifying their meanings and applications in and for current scholarship of the Victorian period. If ecological uses of these ideas, like aesthetic and political uses, are rooted in the nineteenth century, their disparate strands have not yet been sufficiently disentangled. What difference does it make to speak of invasive plants as compared to human invaders? How does our sense of cosmopolitanism, empire, and invasion change when pressure is exerted from other fields? Perhaps most importantly, what are the ethical dimensions of these concepts, especially when nonhuman entities are included?

Type
Research Article
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 49 , Special Issue 1: Special Issue: The Wide Nineteenth Century , Spring 2021 , pp. 27 - 53
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Agathocleous, Tanya, and Rudy, Jason R.. “Victorian Cosmopolitanisms: Introduction.” Victorian Literature and Culture 38, no. 2 (2010): 389–97. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1060150310000069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alt, Christina. “Prickly Pears and Martian Weeds: Ecological Invasion Narratives in History and Fiction.” In Frawley and McCalman, Rethinking Invasion Ecologies, 137–48.Google Scholar
Arata, Stephen. “The Occidental Tourist: Dracula and the Anxiety of Reverse Colonization.” Victorian Studies 33, no. 4 (1990): 621–45.Google Scholar
Bonfiglio, Richard. “Liberal Cosmopolitanism and the Politics of the Heart(h): Mazzini, Gladstone, and Barrett Browning's Domestication of the Italian Risorgimento.” Modern Philology 111, no. 2 (2013): 281–307. https://doi.org/10.1086/67331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Timothy. At Home in the World: Cosmopolitanism Now. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Browne, Janet. “Biogeography and Empire.” In Cultures of Natural History, ed. Jardine, N., Secord, James, and Spary, E. C., 305–21. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Bulfin, Ailise. “‘To Arms!’: Invasion Narratives and Late-Victorian Literature.” Literature Compass 12, no. 9 (2015): 482–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/lic3.12253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caluya, Gilbert. “Fragments for a Postcolonial Critique of the Anthropocene: Invasion Biology and Environmental Security.” In Frawley and McCalman, Rethinking Invasion Ecologies, 31–44.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Mary Wilson. “Medical Cosmopolitanism: Middlemarch, Cholera, and the Pathologies of English Masculinity.” Victorian Literature and Culture 38 (2010): 511–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1060150310000148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Siobhan. An Empire of Air and Water. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Elizabeth. Novel Cultivations: Plants in British Literature of the Global Nineteenth Century. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheah, Pheng. Inhuman Conditions: On Cosmopolitanism and Human Rights. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Cheah, Pheng, and Robbins, Bruce, eds. Cosmopolitics: Thinking and Feeling beyond the Nation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Chew, Matthew K., and Hamilton, Andrew L.. “The Rise and Fall of Biotic Nativeness: A Historical Perspective.” In Richardson, Fifty Years of Invasion Ecology, 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chew, Matthew K., and Laubichler, Manfred D.. “Natural Enemies: Metaphor or Misconception?” Science, n.s., 101, no. 5629 (2003): 52–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Nigel. “The Demon-Seed: Bioinvasion as the Unsettling of Environmental Cosmopolitanism.” Theory, Culture, & Society 19, nos. 1–2 (2002): 101–25.Google Scholar
Clark, Nigel. “Ex-orbitant Globality.” Theory, Culture & Society 22, no. 5 (2005): 165–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276405057198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifford, James. “Mixed Feelings.” In Cheah and Robbins, Cosmopolitics, 362–71.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. Journals and Remarks, 1832–1836. Vol. 3 of Narrative of the Surveying Voyages of His Majesty's Ships Adventure and Beagle between the Years 1826 and 1836, Describing Their Examination of the Southern Shore of South America, and the Beagle's Circumnavigation of the Globe. London: Henry Colburn, 1839. Biodiversity Heritage Library.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London: John Murray, 1859. Biodiversity Heritage Library.Google Scholar
Davis, Mark A., et al. . “Don't Judge Species on Their Origins.” Nature 474, no. 7350 (2011): 153–54. https://doi.org/10.1038/474153a.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Endersby, Jim. Imperial Nature: Joseph Hooker and the Practices of Victorian Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felluga, Dino, and Allen, Emily. “Feeling Cosmopolitan: The Novel Politician after Byron.” European Romantic Review 20, no. 5 (2009): 651–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509580903407795.Google Scholar
Frawley, Jodi, and McCalman, Iain, eds. Rethinking Invasion Ecologies from the Environmental Humanities. New York: Routledge, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodlad, Lauren. “Cosmopolitanism's Actually Existing Beyond: Toward a Victorian Geopolitical Aesthetic.” Victorian Literature and Culture 38, no. 2 (2010): 399–411. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1060150310000070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodlad, Lauren. The Victorian Geopolitical Aesthetic: Realism, Sovereignty, and Transnational Experience. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, A. G. “The New Flora and the Old in Australia.” Nature 48, no. 1233 (1893): 161–63.Google Scholar
Heise, Ursula. Sense of Place and Sense of Planet: The Environmental Imagination of the Global. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hensley, Nathan, and Steer, Philip, eds. Ecological Form: System and Aesthetics in an Age of Empire. New York: Fordham University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Hill, Jen. “Whorled: Cyclones, Systems, and the Geographical Imagination.” Nineteenth-Century Contexts 36, no. 5 (2014): 441–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooker, Joseph Dalton. Himalayan Journals; or, Notes of a Naturalist in Bengal, the Himalayas, the Khasia Mountains, &c. Vol. 1. London: John Murray, 1854. Biodiversity Heritage Library.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooker, Joseph Dalton, and Thomson, Thomas. Flora Indica: Being a Systematic Account of the Plants of British India. London: W. Pamplin, 1855. Biodiversity Heritage Library.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keulartz, Jozef, and van der Weele, Cor. “Framing and Reframing in Invasion Biology.” Configurations 16, no. 1 (2008): 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1353/con.0.0043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno. Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Loudon, J. C. Arboretum et Fruticetum Britannicum; or, The Trees and Shrubs of Britain. Vol. 1. London: Longman, Orme, Green, and Longmans, 1838. Biodiversity Heritage Library.Google Scholar
MacDuffie, Allen. Victorian Literature, Energy, and the Ecological Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marris, Emma. Rambunctious Garden: Saving Nature in a Post-Wild World. London: Bloomsbury, 2011.Google Scholar
Martins, Luciana. “A Naturalist's Vision of the Tropics: Charles Darwin and the Brazilian Landscape.” Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 21, no. 1 (2000): 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Jason. Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital. New York: Verso, 2015.Google Scholar
Morton, Timothy. Ecology without Nature: Rethinking Environmental Aesthetics. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Morton, Timothy. Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Morton, Timothy. “Victorian Hyperobjects.” Nineteenth-Century Contexts: An Interdisciplinary Journal 36, no. 5 (2014): 489–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nixon, Rob. Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, J. P. “Disraeli and England.” Historical Journal 43, no. 3 (2000), 699–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, Fred. The New Wild: Why Invasive Species Will Be Nature's Salvation. Boston: Beacon 2015.Google Scholar
Poovey, Mary. A History of the Modern Fact: Problems of Knowledge in the Sciences of Wealth and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, Christopher D., Pearman, David A., and Hall, Allan R.. “Archaeophytes in Britain.” Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 145 (2004): 257–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2004.00284.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, David M. Fifty Years of Invasion Ecology: The Legacy of Charles Elton. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.Google Scholar
Robbins, Bruce. “Introduction Part I: Actually Existing Cosmopolitanism.” In Cheah and Robbins, Cosmopolitics, 1–19.Google Scholar
Shteir, Ann. Cultivating Women, Cultivating Science: Flora's Daughters and Botany in England, 1760–1860. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Simberloff, Daniel. “Nature, Natives, Nativism, and Management: Worldviews Underlying Controversies in Invasion Biology.” Environmental Ethics 34 (2012): 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Jesse Oak. The Sky of Our Manufacture: The London Fog and British Fiction from Dickens to Woolf. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Taylor, Jesse Oak. “Where Is Victorian Ecocriticism?” Victorian Literature and Culture 43, no. 4 (2015): 877–94. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1060150315000315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt. The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Tsoar, Asaf, Shohami, David, and Nathan, Ran. “A Movement Ecology Approach to Study Seed Dispersal and Plant Invasion: An Overview and Application of Seed Dispersal by Fruit Bats.” In Richardson, Fifty Years of Invasion Ecology, 103–20.Google Scholar
Voskuil, Lynn. “From Specimen to System: Botanical Scale and the Environmental Sublime in Joseph Dalton Hooker's Himalayas.” In Hensley and Steer, Ecological Form, 161–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voskuil, Lynn. “Sotherton and the Geography of Empire: The Landscapes of Mansfield Park.” Studies in Romanticism 53, no. 4 (2014): 591–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, H. G. The War of the Worlds. Ed. Danahay, Martin. Peterborough: Broadview, 2003.Google Scholar
Wilmot, A. “Prickly Pear in South Africa.” Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens; Kew) 45 (1890): 186–88.Google Scholar