Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T13:26:56.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Acuity and contrast sensitivity of the bluegill sunfish and how they change during optic nerve regeneration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2007

D.P.M. NORTHMORE ,
D.-J. OH  and
M.A. CELENZA
D.P.M. NORTHMORE
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware
D.-J. OH
Affiliation:
Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts
M.A. CELENZA
Affiliation:
Chestnut Hill College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Spatial vision was studied in the bluegill sunfish, Lepomis macrochirus (9.5–14 cm standard length) to assess the limitations imposed by the optics of the eye, the retinal receptor spacing and the retinotectal projection during regeneration. Examination of images formed by the dioptric elements of the eye showed that spatial frequencies up to 29 c/° could be imaged on the retina. Cone spacing was measured in the retina of fresh, intact eyes. The spacing of rows of double cones predicted 3.4 c/° as the cutoff spatial frequency; the spacing between rows of single and double cones predicted 6.7 c/°. Contrast sensitivity functions were obtained psychophysically in normals and fish with one regenerating optic nerve. Fish were trained to orient to gratings (mean luminance = 25 cd/m2) presented to either eye. In normals, contrast sensitivity functions were similar in shape and bandwidth to those of other species, peaking at 0.4 c/° with a minimum contrast threshold of 0.03 and a cutoff at about 5 c/°, which was within the range predicted by cone spacing. Given that the optical cutoff frequency exceeds that predicted by cone spacing, it is possible that gratings could be detected by aliasing with the bluegill's regular cone mosaic. However, tests with high contrast gratings up to 15 c/° found no evidence of such detection. After crushing one optic nerve in three trained sunfish, recovery of visual avoidance, dorsal light reflex and orienting to gratings, were monitored over 315 days. At 64–69 days postcrush, responses to gratings reappeared, and within 2–5 days contrast sensitivity at low (0.15 c/°) and medium (1.0 c/°) spatial frequencies had returned to normal. At a high spatial frequency (2.93 c/°) recovery was much slower, and complete only in one fish.

Keywords

Contrast sensitivity functionFish visionFish visual acuityOptic nerve regeneration
Type
Research Article
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , May 2007 , pp. 319 - 331
Copyright
© 2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bando, T. (1991). Discrimination of random dot texture patterns in bluegill sunfish, Lepomis macrochirus. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 172, 663–669.Google Scholar
Bilotta, J. & Powers, M.K. (1991). Spatial contrast sensitivity of goldfish: Mean luminance, temporal frequency and a new psychophysical technique. Vision Research 31, 577–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bisti, S. & Maffei, L. (1974). Behavioural contrast sensitivity of the cat in various meridians. Journal of Physiology 241, 201–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, D.A. & Easter, S.S. (1993). The cone photoreceptor mosaic of the green sunfish, Lepomis cyanellus. Visual Neuroscience 10, 375–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, D.A. & Pugh, E.N. (1991). Double cones as a basis for a new type of polarization vision in vertebrates. Nature 353, 161–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, F.W., Carpenter, R.H. & Levinson, J.Z. (1969). Visibility of aperiodic patterns compared with that of sinusoidal gratings. Journal of Physiology 204, 283–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charman, W.N. & Tucker, J. (1973). The optical system of the goldfish eye. Vision Research 13, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, J.E. & Rankin, E.C.C. (1986). Impaired refinement of the regenerated retinotectal projection of the goldfish in stroboscopic light: A quantitative WGA-HRP study. Experimental Brain Research 63, 421–430.Google Scholar
DeValois, R.L., Morgan, H. & Snodderly, D.M. (1974). Psychophysical studies of monkey vision. III. Spatial luminance contrast sensitivity tests of macaque and human observers. Vision Research 14, 75–81.Google Scholar
Douglas, R.H. & Hawryshyn, C.W. (1990). Behavioural studies of fish vision: An analysis of visual capabilities. In The Visual System of Fish, eds. Douglas, R.H. & Djamgoz, M.B.A., pp. 373–418. London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRef
Edwards, D.L., Alpert, R.A. & Grafstein, B. (1981). Recovery of vision in regeneration of goldfish optic axons: Enhancement of axonal growth by a conditioning lesion. Experimental Neurology 72, 672–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finney, D.J. (1952). Probit analysis: A statistical treatment of the sigmoid response curve. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, M.A. & Northmore, D.P.M. (1996). The role of torus longitudinalis in the dorsal light reflex. Brain, Behavior and Evolution 48, 115–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grundfest, H. (1931). The relative effectiveness of spectral radiation for the vision of the sun-fish, Lepomis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 17, 359–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, D.M. & Muntz, W.R.A. (1993). The role of vision in fish behaviour. In Behavior of Teleost Fishes 2nd, ed. Pitcher., T.J., pp. 89–128. London: Chapman & Hall.CrossRef
Hairston, N.G., Jr., Li, K.T. & Easter, S.S., Jr. (1982). Fish vision and the detection of planktonic prey. Science 218, 1240–1242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawryshyn, C.W., Arnold, M.A., McFarland, W.N. & Loew, E.R. (1988). Aspects of colour vision in bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus): Ecological and evolutionary relevance. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 164, 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodos, W. & Yolen, N.M. (1976). Behavioural correlates of tectal compression in goldfish II. Visual acuity. Brain, Behaviour and Evolution 13, 468–474.Google Scholar
Hurst, P.M. (1954). Color discrimination in the bluegill sunfish. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 46, 442–445.Google Scholar
Kawamura, G. & Shimowada, T. (1993). Optic critical duration and contrast thresholds in the freshwater fish, Lepomis macrochirus, as determined behaviourally. Fisheries Research 17, 251–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyall, A.H. (1957). Cone arrangements in teleost retinae. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science 98, 189–201.Google Scholar
Muntz, W.R.A. (1974). Comparative aspects in behavioural studies of vertebrate vision. In The Eye, Vol. 6, eds. Davson, H. & Graham, L.T., pp. 155–226. New York: Academic Press.
Muntz, W.R.A. & Gwyther, J. (1988). Visual acuity in Octopus pallidus and Octopus australis. Journal of Experimental Biology 134, 119–129.Google Scholar
Murray, M. & Edwards, M.A. (1982). A quantitative study of reinnervation of the goldfish optic tectum following optic nerve crush. Journal of Comparative Neurology 209, 363–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumeyer, C. (2003). Wavelength dependence of visual acuity in goldfish. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 189, 811–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Northmore, D.P.M. (1968). A simple live-worm dispenser. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 11, 617–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Northmore, D.P.M. (1981). Visual localisation after rearrangement of retinotectal maps in fish. Nature 293, 142–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Northmore, D.P.M. & Celenza, M.A. (1992). Recovery of contrast sensitivity during optic nerve regeneration in fish. Experimental Neurology 115, 69–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Northmore, D.P.M. & Dvorak, C.A. (1979). Contrast sensitivity and acuity of the goldfish. Vision Research 19, 255–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Northmore, D.P.M. & Masino, T. (1984). Recovery of vision in fish after optic nerve crush: A behavioral and electrophysiological study. Experimental Neurology 84, 109–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Northmore, D.P.M. & Oh, D.-J. (2001). Sequential recovery of sensitivity to negative and positive contrasts during optic nerve regeneration in goldfish. Visual Neuroscience 18, 197–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Northmore, D.P.M., Skeen, L.C. & Pindzola, J.M. (1981). Visuomotor perimetry in fish: A new approach to the functional analysis of altered visual pathways. Vision Research 21, 843–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penzlin, H. & Stubbe, M. (1977). Studies on the visual acuity in the goldfish (Carassius auratus L.). Zoologische Jahrbucher: Abteilung für Algemeine Zoologie und Physiologie Der Tiere 81, 310–326.Google Scholar
Sivak, J.G. (1973). Interrelation of feeding behavior and accommodative lens movements in some species of North American freshwater fishes. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 30, 1141–1146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Springer, A.D. & Agranoff, B.W. (1977). Effect of temperature on rate of goldfish optic nerve regeneration: A radioautographic and behavioral study. Brain Research 128, 405–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Springer, A.D., Easter, S.S. & Agranoff, B.W. (1977). The role of the optic tectum in various visually mediated behaviors in goldfish. Brain Research 128, 393–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sroczynski, S. & Muntz, W.R.A. (1985). Image structure in Eledone cirrhosa, an octopus. Zoologische Jahrbucher (Physiologie) 89, 157–501.Google Scholar
Uhlrich, D.J., Essock, E.A. & Lehmkuhle, S. (1981). Cross-Species correspondence of spatial contrast sensitivity functions. Behavioural Brain Research 2, 291–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, H. (1990). Retinal structure of fishes. In The Visual System of Fish, eds. Douglas, R.H. & Djamgoz, M.B.A., pp. 109–157. London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRef
Weiler, I.J. (1966). Restoration of visual acuity after optic nerve section and regeneration, in Astronotus ocellatus. Experimental Neurology 15, 377–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, M. & Keast, A. (1988). Retinal structure relative to feeding in the rock bass (Ambloplites rupestris) and bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus). Canadian Journal of Zoology 66, 2840–2846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, E. & Zerrahn-Wolf, G. (1936). Threshold intensity of illumination and flicker frequency for the eye of the sun-fish. Journal of General Physiology 19, 495–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar