Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T05:17:43.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Control of Whitebrush (Aloysia lycioides) and Associated Species with Soil-Applied Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. E. Meyer
Affiliation:
Agric. Res., Sci. Ed. Admin., U.S. Dep. Agric., Dep. Range Sci., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843
R. W. Bovey
Affiliation:
Agric. Res., Sci. Ed. Admin., U.S. Dep. Agric., Dep. Range Sci., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843

Abstract

The responses of whitebrush (Aloysia lycioides Cham.) and several associated species to herbicides were evaluated in the Central Basin and South Plains of Texas. At Llano, hexazinone [3-cyclohexyl-6-(dimethylamino)-1-methyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4(1H,3H)-dione], picloram (4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid), and tebuthiuron {N-[5-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl]-N,N′-dimethylurea} were the most effective herbicides for whitebrush control. Picloram was the most effective herbicide on Lindheimer pricklypear (Opuntia lindheimeri Engelm.), tasajillo (Opuntia leptocaulis DC.), Texas colubrina [Colubrina texensis (Torr. & Gray) Gray], and Texas persimmon (Diospyros texana Scheele). Hexazinone, karbutilate [tert-butylcarbamic acid ester with 3(m-hydroxyphenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea], and tebuthiuron controlled live oak (Quercus virginiana Mill.). Tebuthiuron pellets were slightly more effective on whitebrush when applied broadcast than when applied in rows 1.8 to 6.0 m apart. Roller chopping alone did not kill whitebrush nor improve effectiveness of tebuthiuron but did improve access to the land and visibility for 3 yr. Picloram applied either as the undiluted liquid formulation or as granules was the most effective herbicide for controlling a spectrum of species, including whitebrush. Picloram pellets were generally more effective on Lindheimer pricklypear and Texas persimmon when applied broadcast than when applied in rows. However, tebuthiuron was the most effective herbicide on blackbrush acacia (Acacia rigidula Benth.) and huisache [Acacia farnesiana (L.) Willd.], especially when applied in rows rather than broadcast.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1980 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bovey, R. W. 1977. Response of selected woody plants in the United States to herbicides. U.S. Dep. Agric. Handb. 493. 101 pp.Google Scholar
2. Bovey, R. W., Flynt, T. O., Meyer, R. E., Baur, J. R., and Riley, T. E. 1976. Subsurface herbicide applicator for brush control. J. Range Manage. 29:338341.Google Scholar
3. Bovey, R. W. and Meyer, R. E. 1978. Control of huisache with soil applied herbicides. J. Range Manage. 31:179182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Bovey, R. W., Morton, H. L., Baur, J. R., Diaz-Colon, J. D., Dowler, C. C., and Lehman, S. K. 1969. Granular herbicides for woody plant control. Weed Sci. 17:538541.Google Scholar
5. Bovey, R. W., Morton, H. L., Meyer, R. E., Flynt, T. O., and Riley, T. E. 1972. Control of yaupon and associated species. Weed Sci. 20:246249.Google Scholar
6. Flynt, T. O., Bovey, R. W., Meyer, R. E., Riley, T. E., and Baur, J. R. 1976. Granular herbicide applicator for brush control. J. Range Manage. 29:435437.Google Scholar
7. Hoffman, G. O. 1970. Brush control with granular herbicides. Texas Agric. Ext. Leaflet 898. 1 p.Google Scholar
8. Hoffman, G. O. 1973. Brush management with chemicals. Aerial broadcast application. Texas Agric. Ext. Leaflet 415. 1 p.Google Scholar
9. Meyer, R. E. and Bovey, R. W. 1979. Control of honey mesquite (Prosopis juliflora var. glandulosa) and Macartney rose (Rosa bracteata) with soil-applied herbicides. Weed Sci. 27:280284.Google Scholar
10. Meyer, R. E. and Bovey, R. W. 1979. Control of live oak (Quercus virginiana) with soil-applied herbicides. Weed Sci. (In press).Google Scholar
11. Meyer, R. E., Bovey, R. W., and Baur, J. R. 1978. Control of an oak (Quercus) complex with herbicide granules. Weed Sci. 26:444453.Google Scholar
12. Meyer, R. E., Bovey, R. W., Riley, T. E., and Flynt, T. O. 1976. Seasonal response of Macartney rose and huisache to herbicides. J. Range Manage. 29:157160.Google Scholar
13. Meyer, R. E. and Riley, T. E. 1969. Influence of picloram granules and sprays on whitebrush. Weed Sci. 17:293295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Meyer, R. E., Riley, T. E., Morton, H. L., and Merkle, M. G. 1969. Control of whitebrush and associated species with herbicides in Texas. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. Misc. Pub. 930. 18 pp.Google Scholar
15. Peevey, F. A. 1973. Bromacil and picloram under southern upland hardwoods. Weed Sci. 21:5456.Google Scholar
16. Scifres, C. J. 1975. Texas persimmon distribution and control with individual plant treatments. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 1157. 12 pp.Google Scholar
17. Scifres, C. J. and Mutz, J. L. 1978. Herbaceous vegetation changes following applications of tebuthiuron for brush control. J. Range Manage. 31:375378.Google Scholar
18. Scifres, C. J., Mutz, J. L., and Hamilton, W. T. 1979. Control of mixed brush with tebuthiuron. J. Range Manage. 32:155158.Google Scholar
19. Scifres, C. J., Mutz, J. L., and Meadors, C. H. 1978. Response of range vegetation to grid placement and aerial application of karbutilate. Weed Sci. 26:139144.Google Scholar
20. Smith, H. N. and Rechenthin, C. A. 1964. Grassland Restoration. Part I. The Texas Brush Problem, U.S. Dep. Agric. Soil Conserv. Serv. 4–19114. 49 pp.Google Scholar
21. Stritzke, J. F. 1976. Selective removal of brush by grid placement of herbicides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 29:255 (Abstract).Google Scholar
22. Young, J. A. and Evans, R. A. 1976. Control of pinyon saplings with picloram or karbutilate. J. Range Manage. 29:144147.Google Scholar