Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T19:12:56.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Crop Manipulation in Integrated Weed Management Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Robert H. Walker  and
Gale A. Buchanan
Robert H. Walker
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Soils, Auburn Univ. Agric. Exp. Stn.
Gale A. Buchanan
Affiliation:
Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL 36849
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Integrated weed management (IWM) became an accepted, and frequently used, term by weed scientists in the early 1970's. It has been argued by some that IWM is simply new terminology for a system that was previously called “weed control”. In any event, the acceptance of the “management concept” has assured the grower that chemicals for weed control are merely a component part of a total system for managing weeds in crops (9, 65).

Type
Other
Information
Weed Science , Volume 30 , Issue S1: Supplement 1: Integrated Weed Management Systems Technology for Crop Production and Protection. Proceedings of a Symposium of the Weed Science Society of America. February 19, 1981. Las Vegas, Nevada , 1982 , pp. 17 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Aldrich, S. R., Scott, W. O., and Leng, E. R. 1975. Pages 223–237 in Modern Corn Production. A and L Publ., Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
2. Anderson, W. P. 1977. Pages 30–108 in Weed Science: Principles. West Publ. Co., New York.Google Scholar
3. ARS National Research Program. 1976. Weed control. Pages 80–83 in NRP No. 20280. U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., Washington, DC.Google Scholar
4. Bonner, James. 1950. The role of toxic substances in the interactions of higher plants. Bot. Rev. 16:51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Borner, H. 1960. Liberation of organic substances from higher plants and their role in the soil sickness problem. Bot. Rev. 26:393–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Buchanan, G. A. 1976. Management of the weed pests of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Pages 168–184 in Proc. U.S.–U.S.S.R. Symposium: The integrated control of the arthropod, disease and weed pests of cotton, grain sorghum and deciduous fruit, Lubbock, TX.Google Scholar
7. Buchanan, G. A. 1976. Weeds and weed management in cotton. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Res. Conf., pp. 166–168.Google Scholar
8. Buchanan, G. A. 1977. Allelopathy and weed science. Pages 100–112 in Agric. Res. Serv., ed. The Role of Secondary Compounds in Plant Interactions (Allelopathy).Google Scholar
9. Buchanan, G. A. 1979. Role of weed management in cotton production. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Res. Conf., pp. 246–248.Google Scholar
10. Buchanan, G. A. and Hauser, E. W. 1980. Influence of row spacing on competitiveness and yield of peanuts (Arachis hypogaea . Weed Sci. 28:401–409.Google Scholar
11. Buchanan, G. A., Hoveland, C. S., Brown, V. L., and Wade, R. H. 1975. Weed population shifts influenced by crop rotations and weed control programs. Proc. South Weed Sci. Soc. 28:60–71.Google Scholar
12. Buchanan, G. A., Hoveland, C. S., and Harris, M. C. 1975. Response of weeds to soil pH. Weed Sci. 23:473–477.Google Scholar
13. Buchanan, G. A. and McLaughlin, R. D. 1974. Influence of nitrogen on weed competition in cotton. Weed Sci. 23:324–328.Google Scholar
14. Burnside, O. C. 1972. Tolerance of soybean cultivars to weed competition and herbicides. Weed Sci. 20:294–297.Google Scholar
15. Burnside, O. C. 1979. Soybean (Glycine max) growth was affected by weed removal. Weed Sci. 27:562–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Chapman, S. R. and Carter, L. P. 1976. Pages 95–210 in Crop Production Principles and Practices. W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco.Google Scholar
17. Cope, J. T. Jr. 1981. Effects of 50 years of fertilization with phosphorus and potassium on soil-test levels and yields at six locations. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 45:342–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Cope, J. T. Jr. and Thurlow, D. L. 1980. Corn-wheat-soybean rotations and their response to nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium. Ala. Agric. Exp. Stn., Highlights of Agric. Res. 27(3):16.Google Scholar
19. Corbin, F. T. and Upchurch, R. P. 1967. Influence of pH on detoxification of herbicides in soil. Weeds 15:370–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Creel, F. M. Jr., Hoveland, C. S., and Buchanan, G. A. 1968. Germination, growth, and ecology of sicklepod. Weed Sci. 16:396–400.Google Scholar
21. Dale, J. E. and Chandler, J. M. 1979. Herbicide-crop rotation for johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control. Weed Sci. 27:479–485.Google Scholar
22. Denmead, O. T., Fritschen, L. J., and Shaw, R. H. 1962. Spatial distribution of net radiation in a corn field. Agron. J. 54:505–510.Google Scholar
23. Dowler, C. C. and Hauser, E. W. 1974. The effect of cultivation on weeds controlled by fluometuron in cotton. Proc. South Weed Sci. Soc. 27:112–115.Google Scholar
24. Dowler, C. C., Hauser, E. W., and Johnson, A. W. 1974. Cropherbicide sequences on a southeastern coastal plain soil. Weed Sci. 22:500–505.Google Scholar
25. Emmond, G. S. and Ledingham, R. J. 1972. Effects of crop rotation on some soil-borne pathogens of potato. Can. J. Plant Sci. 52:605–611.Google Scholar
26. Fay, P. K. and Duke, W. B. 1977. An assessment of allelopathic potential in Avena germ plasm. Weed Sci. 25:224–228.Google Scholar
27. Frans, R. E. 1969. Changing ecology of weeds in cotton fields. Proc. Cotton Prod. and Mech. Conf. 29:24–30.Google Scholar
28. Freeman, K. C. 1968. Influence of row spacing on yield and quality of sugarcane in Georgia. Agron. J. 60:424–425.Google Scholar
29. Gilbert, B. E. and Pember, F. R. 1935. Tolerance of certain weeds and grasses to toxic aluminum. Soil Sci. 39:425–429.Google Scholar
30. Godel, G. L. 1935. Relations between rate of seeding and yield of cereal crops in competition with weeds. Sci. Agr. 16:165–168.Google Scholar
31. Grant, E. A. and Sallans, W. G. 1964. Influence of plant extracts on germination and growth of eight forage species. J. Br. Grassl. Soc. 19:191–197.Google Scholar
32. Guenzi, W. D., McCalla, T. M., and Norstadt, F. A. 1967. Presence and persistance of phytotoxic substances in wheat, oat, corn, and sorghum residues. Agron. J. 59:163–165.Google Scholar
33. Guneyli, E., Burnside, O. C., and Nordquist, P. T. 1969. Influence of seedling characteristics on weed competitive ability of sorghum hybrids and inbred lines. Crop Sci. 9:713–716.Google Scholar
34. Hartwig, E. E. 1957. Row width and rates of planting in the southern states. Soybean Dig. 17:13–14, 16.Google Scholar
35. Hauser, E. W., Dowler, C. C., Jellum, M. C., and Cecil, S. R. 1974. Effects of herbicide-crop rotation on nutsedge, annual grasses and crops. Weed Sci. 22:172–176.Google Scholar
36. Hiltbold, A. E. and Buchanan, G. A. 1977. Influence of soil pH on persistence of atrazine in the field. Weed Sci. 25:515–520.Google Scholar
37. Hoveland, C. S. 1964. Germination and seedling vigor of clovers as affected by grass root extract. Crop Sci. 4:211–213.Google Scholar
38. Hoveland, C. S., Buchanan, G. A., and Harris, M. C. 1975. Response of weeds to soil phosphorus and potassium. Weed Sci. 24:194–201.Google Scholar
39. Jensen, L. A. 1962. Are we planting weeds? Proc. West. Weed Control Conf. 18:52.Google Scholar
40. Kelley, A. D. and Burns, V. F. 1975. Dissemination of weed seeds by irrigation water. Weed Sci. 23:486–493.Google Scholar
41. Ladlie, J. S., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1976. Effect of pH on metribuzin activity in the soil. Weed Sci. 24:505–507.Google Scholar
42. Lehman, W. F. and Lambert, J. W. 1960. Effects of spacing of soybean plants between and within rows on yield and its components. Agron. J. 52:84–86.Google Scholar
43. Leighty, C. E. 1938. Crop rotation. Pages 406–430 in U.S. Dep. Agric. Yearbook of Agric. Soils and Men.Google Scholar
44. Lockerman, R. H. and Putnam, A. R. 1975. Suppression of weeds with allelopathic accessions of cucumbers. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 30:31.Google Scholar
45. Lockerman, R. H. and Putnam, A. R. 1977. Suppression of weeds with allelopathic accessions of cucumbers. Abstr., Weed Sci. Soc. Am. No. 86.Google Scholar
46. Lockerman, R. H. and Putnam, A. R. 1979. Evaluation of allelopathic cucumbers (Cucumis sativus) as an aid to weed control. Weed Sci. 27:54–57.Google Scholar
47. Loomis, R. S., Duncan, W. G., Dovrat, A., and Nunez, F. A. 1968. Canopy architecture at various population densities and the growth and grain yield of corn. Crop Sci. 8:303–308.Google Scholar
48. Loomis, R. S., Duncan, W. G., Dovrat, A., and Nunez, F. A. 1968. Quantitative descriptions of foliage display and light absorption in field communities of corn plants. Crop Sci. 8:352–356.Google Scholar
49. Maloy, O. C. and Burkholder, W. H. 1959. Some effects of crop rotation on the fusarium root rot of bean. Phytopathology 49:583–587.Google Scholar
50. Martin, J. H. and Leonard, W. H. Pages 70–73 in Principles of Field Crop Production. Macmillan Publ. Co., New York.Google Scholar
51. McBeath, D. K., Dew, D. A., and Friesen, H. A. 1970. Competition between barley and wild oats as affected by nitrogen, barban, and time of seeding. Can. J. Plant Sci. 50:541–550.Google Scholar
52. McWhorter, C. G. and Hartwig, E. E. 1972. Competition of johnsongrass and cocklebur with six soybean varieties. Weed Sci. 20:56–59.Google Scholar
53. Metcalfe, D. S. and Elkins, D. M. 1980. Pages 205–330 in Crop Production Principles and Practices. Macmillan Publ. Co., Inc., New York.Google Scholar
54. Muller, C. H. 1969. Allelopathy as a factor in ecological processes. Vegetatio, Haag 18(1–6):348–357.Google Scholar
55. Muller, C. H., Muller, W. H., and Haines, B. L. 1964. Volatile growth inhibitors produced by aromatic shrubs. Science 143:471–473.Google Scholar
56. National Academy of Sciences. 1975. Pest control: An assessment of present and alternative technologies. Pages 45–129 in Corn/Soybeans Pest Control. Natl. Acad. Sci., Washington, DC.Google Scholar
57. Nieto, J. H. and Staniforth, D. W. 1961. Corn-foxtail competition under various production conditions. Agron. J. 53.1–5.Google Scholar
58. Parker, E. C. 1915. Pages 71–97 in Field Management and Crop Rotation. Webb Publ. Co., St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar
59. Patrick, Z. A. 1971. Phytotoxic substances associated with the decomposition in soil of plant residues. Soil Sci. 111:13–18.Google Scholar
60. Putnam, A. R. and Duke, W. B. 1974. Biological suppression of weeds: evidence for allelopathy in accessions of cucumber. Science 185:370–372.Google Scholar
61. Rice, E. L. 1974. Allelopathy. Academic Press, New York. 353 pp.Google Scholar
62. Ricky, F. D. 1933. Corn culture. USDA Farmer Bul. 1714:18–20.Google Scholar
63. Roberts, H. A. 1962. Effect of six years of cropping on the weed seeds in the soil. J. Ecol. 50:803–813.Google Scholar
64. Robinson, A. R. and Humphreys, A. S. 1967. Water control and measurement on the farm. Page 838 in Hagan, R. M., Haise, H. R., and Edminster, T. W., eds. Irrigation of Agricultural Lands. Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
65. Rodgers, E. G. 1978. Weeds and their control. Pages 164–186 in Roberts, D. A., ed. Fundamentals of Plant-Pest Control. W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco.Google Scholar
66. Rogers, N. K., Buchanan, G. A., and Johnson, W. C. 1976. Influence of row spacing on weed competition with cotton. Weed Sci. 24:410–413.Google Scholar
67. Sexsmithe, J. J. and Russell, G. C. 1963. Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on wild oats and spring wheat. Can. J. Plant Sci. 43:64–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
68. Shaw, W. C. 1964. Weed science – revolution in agricultural technology. Weed Sci. 12:153–162.Google Scholar
69. Shaw, W. C., Wax, L. M., McWhorter, C. G., Dowler, C. C., and Andersen, R. N. 1979. Progress in the development of weed control technology for soybean production. Annual meeting of the Natl. Soybean Crop Improvement Council's Advisory Board Meeting and the 50th Anniv. Meeting of the Natl. Soybean Processors Assoc., Hilton Head, SC.Google Scholar
70. Slife, F. W. and Wax, L. M. 1976. Weed and herbicide management. Pages 397–403 in Hill, L. D., ed. World Soybean Research. Interstate Printers & Publ., Inc., Danville, IL.Google Scholar
71. Smith, R. J. Jr. 1979. How to control the hard-to-kill weeds in rice. Weeds Today. 10(1):12–14.Google Scholar
72. Smith, R. J. Jr. and Shaw, W. C. 1966. Weeds and their control in rice production. U.S. Dept. Agric. Bull. 292. 64 pp.Google Scholar
73. Staniforth, D. W. 1961. Response of corn hybrids to yellow foxtail competition. Weeds. 9:132–136.Google Scholar
74. Staniforth, D. W. 1962. Response of soybean varieties to weed competition. Agron. J. 54:11–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
75. Teem, D. H., Hoveland, C. S., and Buchanan, G. A. 1974. Primary root elongation of three weed species. Weed Sci. 22:47–50.Google Scholar
76. Thatcher, R. W. 1923. The effect of one crop on another. Agron. J. 15:331–338.Google Scholar
77. Thorne, D. W., and Peterson, H. W. 1954. Pages 217–236 in Irrigated Soils, Their Fertility and Management. The Blakiston Co., Inc., Toronto.Google Scholar
78. Timmons, F. L. 1970. A history of weed control in the United States and Canada. Weed Sci. 18:294–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
79. Tukey, H. B. Jr. 1966. Leaching of metabolites from above-ground plant parts and its implications. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club. 93:385–410.Google Scholar
80. Vengris, Jonas, Colby, W. G., and Drake, M. 1955. Plant nutrient competition between weeds and corn. Agron. J. 47:213–216.Google Scholar
81. Walker, R. H., Whitwell, T., Harris, J. R., Thurlow, D. L., and McGuire, J. A. 1981. Sicklepod control in soybeans with herbicides, row spacings, and planting dates. Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn., Highlights of Agric. Res. 28(1):18.Google Scholar
82. Wax, L. M. and Pendleton, J. W. 1968. Effect of row spacing on weed control in soybeans. Weeds 16:462–464.Google Scholar
83. Weber, J. B., Best, J. A., and Witt, W. W. 1974. Herbicide residues and weed species shifts on modified-soil field plots. Weed Sci. 22:427–433.Google Scholar
84. Wiese, A. F., Collier, J. F., Clark, L. E., and Havelka, U. D. 1964. Effects of weeds and cultural practices on sorghum yields. Weeds 12:209–211.Google Scholar
85. Wiggans, R. G. 1939. The influence of space and arrangement on the production of soybean plants. Agron. J. 31:314–321.Google Scholar
86. Wilcox, J. R. 1974. Response of three soybean strains to equidistant spacing. Agron. J. 66:409–412.Google Scholar
87. Wilson, R. G. Jr. 1980. Dissemination of weed seeds by surface irrigation water in western Nebraska. Weed Sci. 28:87–92.Google Scholar
88. Yao, Augustine Y. M. and Shaw, R. H. 1964. Effect of plant population and planting pattern of corn on the distribution of net radiation. Agron. J. 56:165–169.Google Scholar