Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-zpsnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-05T16:13:35.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Economics of Common Cocklebur Control in Soybean Production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

J. M. Anderson  and
C. G. McWhorter
J. M. Anderson
Affiliation:
Delta Branch, Mississippi Agr., Stoneville, MS 38776
C. G. McWhorter
Affiliation:
S. Weed Sci. Lab., Agr. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agr., Stoneville, MS 38776
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effects of common cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum Wallr.) on soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] yields, grades, and net returns were determined by regression analysis of data from 450 research plots from 1971 through 1973. Common cocklebur control from 0 to 100% was achieved by various combinations of preemergence and postemergence practices. Foreign matter in soybean seed samples was 0.7% with total common cocklebur control and 5.1% with no control. At least 70% control of common cocklebur was required to avoid deductions from gross harvested weights due to seed moisture levels exceeding 13%. Small discounts for damaged kernels occurred when common cocklebur control was less than 40%. With 100% common cocklebur control, the estimated US soybean grade was 1.3. Failure to control common cocklebur resulted in a predicted grade of 3.9. When adjusted for various weight discounts, soybean yields were 1170 kg/ha without control of common cocklebur and 1890 kg/ha for 100% control. Soybean yields were increased about 6% for each 10% increase in common cocklebur control. Net returns to land, management, and general farm overhead were $63/ha when common cocklebur was not controlled, and $119/ha with 95% control.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 24 , Issue 4 , July 1976 , pp. 397 - 400
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Barrentine, W.L. 1974. Common cocklebur competition in soybeans. Weed Sci. 22:600–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Cooke, F.T. Jr., Anderson, J.M., and Heagler, A.M. 1972. Crop budgets and planning data for major farm enterprise in the Yazoo-Mississippi Delta. Miss. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 794. 56 pp.Google Scholar
3. Draper, N.R. and Smith, H. 1966. Applied Regression Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York. 407 pp.Google Scholar
4. Hay, J.R. 1974. Gains to the grower from weed science. Weed Sci. 22: 439–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. McWhorter, C.G. and Anderson, J.M. 1976. Effectiveness of metribuzin applied preemergence for economical control of common cocklebur in soybeans. Weed Sci. 24: 385–390.Google Scholar
6. McWhorter, C.G. and Anderson, J.M. 1976. Bentazon applied postemergence for economical control of common cocklebur in soybeans. Weed Sci. 24: 391–396.Google Scholar
7. McWhorter, C.G. and Hartwig, E.E. 1972. Competition of johnsongrass and cocklebur with six soybean varieties. Weed Sci. 20:56–59.Google Scholar
8. Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J.H. 1960. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York. 481 pp.Google Scholar
9. U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1970. P. 8.1–8.6 in Official grain standards of the United States. Revised Ed., U.S. Government Print Office. Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
10. Waldrep, T.W. and McLaughlin, R.D. 1969. Cocklebur competition and control. Soybean Farmer 3:26–27, 30.Google Scholar