Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-25T17:39:13.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Cylocate and Aldicarb Alone and in Combination on Growth of Three Sugarbeet Species (Beta spp.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Cyrus Abivardi  and
Jack Altman
Cyrus Abivardi
Affiliation:
Dep. Botany and Plant Path., Colorado State Univ., Ft. Collins, CO 80523
Jack Altman
Affiliation:
Dep. Botany and Plant Path., Colorado State Univ., Ft. Collins, CO 80523
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Growth of sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L. ‘Mono Hy A1’ and ‘Mono Hy D2′) and (B. patellaris Moq.) seedlings in cycloate (S-ethyl N-ethylthiocyclohexanecarbamate)-amended soil infested with the sugarbeet nematode (Heterodera schachtii Schmidt) was reduced (P = 0.05) at a concentration of 4 jug cycloate/g soil. Although the combination of cyloate with aldicarb [2-methyl-2-(methylthio) propionaldehyde-O-(methylcarbomyl) oxime] resulted in a significantly (P = 0.05) reduced growth of both sugarbeet cultivars and B. patellaris, it did not affect the nematicidal properties of aldicarb. Cycloate alone or in combination with aldicarb did not affect the growth of B. procumbens Chr. Sm. seedlings.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , March 1978 , pp. 161 - 162
Copyright
Copyright © 1978 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Alley, H. P. 1967. Weed control in sugarbeets. Sugarbeet J. 30:14–47.Google Scholar
2. Altman, J. 1969. Predisposition of sugarbeets to Rhizoctonia solani damping-off with herbicide. Phytopathology 59:1015 (abstract).Google Scholar
3. Campbell, C. Lee. 1976. Herbicide-pathogen interactions in plants. M. S. Thesis, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins. 118 pp.Google Scholar
4. Chablay, R. 1970. Weed control trials in sugarbeet with new herbicide mixtures. Proc. Int. Mtg. Selective Weed Control Beetcrops 101–106.Google Scholar
5. Dawson, J. H. 1971. Response of sugarbeets and weeds to cycloate, propachlor, and pyrazon. Weed Sci. 19:162–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Dexter, A. G. 1971. Weed control and crop injury from herbicide combinations used in sugarbeets. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 26:60 (abstract).Google Scholar
7. Duncan, D. B. 1951. A significant test for differences between ranked treatments in analysis of variance. Va. J. Sci. 2:171–189.Google Scholar
8. Golden, A. M. 1958. Susceptibility of several Beta species to the sugarbeet nematode (Heterodera schachtii) and root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne spp.). J. Am. Soc. Sugar Beet Technol. 10:444–447.Google Scholar
9. Johnson, R. N. and Viglierchio, D. R. 1969. Sugar beet nematode (Heterodera schachtii) reared on axenic Beta vulgaris root explants. Nematologica 15:129–143.Google Scholar
10. Kuhr, R. J. and Dorough, W. H. 1976. Carbamate insecticides; chemistry, biochemistry, and toxicology. CRC Press Inc., Cleveland, OH 301 pp.Google Scholar
11. Lee, G. A., Alley, H. P., and Krionderis, D. J. 1969. Effect on pyrazon and cycloate in combination with phorate on phytotoxicity to sugarbeet seedlings. Res. Prog. Rep. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 92–93.Google Scholar
12. Olson, P. D. and Stanger, C. E. 1969. Herbicide combinations in sugarbeets. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. p. 34.Google Scholar
13. Posier, G. and Evans, J. O. 1972. Evaluation of several preplant herbicides for sugarbeets in Utah. Res. Prog. Rep. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 87–88.Google Scholar
14. Savitsky, H. 1975. Hybridization between Beta vulgaris and B. procumbens and transmission of nematode (Heterodera schachtii) resistance to sugarbeet. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 17:197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar