Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T07:24:20.926Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Date of Preplant Tillage and Planting on Weed Populations and Mechanical Weed Control in Soybean (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Douglas D. Buhler
Affiliation:
Nat. Soil Tilth Lab., U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., 2150 Pammel Drive., Ames, IA 50011
Jeffery L. Gunsolus
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Plant Genet. Univ. Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108

Abstract

Additional information on mechanical weed management systems is needed so producers can develop systems that meet their production and weed control goals without sacrificing profitability. Field research was conducted at Rosemount, MN, in 1989, 1990, and 1991 to determine the effect of preplant tillage and soybean planting date on weed populations and effectiveness of mechanical weed control operations. Delaying soybean planting from mid-May to early-June reduced weed densities and yield losses from weeds. Weed control with a herbicide treatment was not affected by planting date, but control with rotary hoeing and cultivation was often increased by delaying soybean planting. Early-planted soybean usually yielded better following herbicide treatment than mechanical weed control. However, when preplant tillage and planting were delayed, weed densities were reduced and mechanical weed control operations usually resulted in soybean yield similar to the herbicide treatment. While delaying soybean planting reduced weed densities and improved mechanical weed control, there is potential for reduced soybean yields with delayed planting.

Type
Weed Management
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Buhler, D. D., Gunsolus, J. L., and Ralston, D. F. 1992. Integrated weed management techniques to reduce herbicide inputs in soybean. Agron. J. 84: 973978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Burnside, O. C. and Colville, W. L. 1964. Soybean and weed yields as affected by irrigation, row spacing, tillage, and amiben. Weeds 12: 109112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Chepil, W. S. 1946. Germination of weed seed. I. Longevity, periodicity of germination, and vitality of seeds in cultivated land. Sci. Agric. 26: 307346.Google Scholar
4. Edwards, C. A. 1987. The concept of integrated systems in lower input/sustainable agriculture. Am. J. Alt. Agric. 2: 148152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Fernald, M. L. 1950. Pages 594595 in Gray's Manual of Botany, 8th ed., American Book Co., New York.Google Scholar
6. Fernholz, C. 1990. How I control weeds without herbicides. The New Farm. March/April: 1720.Google Scholar
7. Forcella, P. and Buhler, D. D. 1993. Emergence from seedbanks of 13 weed species. Abstr. Weed Soc. Am. p. 93.Google Scholar
8. Forcella, F., Buhler, D. D., Alm, D. A., Stoller, E. W., Jurik, T. W., and Jordan, N. 1993. FOX-EMERG: Prediction of giant foxtail seedling emergence throughout the Corn Belt. Agron. Abstr. p. 124.Google Scholar
9. Forcella, F., Wilson, R. G., Renner, K. A., Dekker, J., Harvey, R. G., Alm, D. A., Buhler, D. D., and Cardina, J. A. 1992. Weed seedbanks of the U.S. Cornbelt: magnitude, variation, emergence, and application. Weed Sci. 40: 636644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Gunsolus, J. L. 1990. Mechanical and cultural weed control in corn and soybeans. Am. J. Alt. Agric. 5: 114119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Gunsolus, J. L. 1995. Soybean weed management. Pages 4858, in Durgan, B. R., Gunsolus, J. L., Becker, R. L., and Dexter, A. G. Cultural and chemical weed control in field crops. Univ. Minnesota Extension Serv., AG-BU-3157-S.Google Scholar
12. Hardman, L. L. and Gunsolus, J. L. 1994. Soybean growth and development & management information for replant decisions. Univ. Minnesota Extension Serv. AG-FO-5701-C.Google Scholar
13. Lovely, W. G., Weber, C. R., and Staniforth, D. W. 1958. Effectiveness of the rotary hoe for weed control in soybeans. Agron. J. 50: 621625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Mester, T. C. and Buhler, D. D. 1990. Effects of seed depth on velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) seedling development and response to cyanazine. Weed Sci. 38: 3438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Peters, E. J., Klingman, D. L., and Larson, R. E. 1959. Rotary hoeing in combination with herbicides and other cultivations for weed control in soybeans. Weeds 7: 449458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Robinson, R. G. and Dunham, R. S. 1956. Pre-planting tillage for weed control in soybeans. Agron. J. 48: 493495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Schweizer, E. E. and Zimdahl, R. L. 1984. Weed seed decline in irrigated soil after six years of continuous corn (Zea mays) and herbicides. Weed Sci. 32: 7683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Springman, R., Buhler, D., Schuler, R., Mueller, D., and Doll, J. 1989. Row crop cultivators for conservation tillage systems. Univ. of WI Extension Pub. A3483.Google Scholar
19. Staricka, J. A., Burford, P. M., Allmaras, R. R., and Nelson, W. W. 1990. Tracing the vertical distribution of simulated shattered seeds as related to tillage. Agron. J. 82: 11311134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Stoller, E. W. and Wax, L. M. 1973. Periodicity of germination and emergence of some annual weeds. Weed Sci. 21: 574580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar