Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T21:01:48.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of No-till Systems on Weed Control and Yields of Continuous Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Charles L. Cleary
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Thomas F. Peeper
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078

Abstract

Experiments were conducted from 1979 to 1982 to determine whether selected herbicide treatments applied before or after harvest would provide adequate weed control without the use of tillage between crops in continuous winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production systems. of the herbicide treatments evaluated, only oryzalin (3,5-dinitro-N4,N4-dipropylsulfanilamide) at 2.2 kg ai/ha applied prior to wheat maturity adequately controlled summer annual weeds each year. Populations of yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus L. # CYPES) and/or clammy groundcherry (Physalis heterophylla Nees) increased from continued preharvest use of oryzalin in no-till treatments and were greater than those resulting from conventional tillage or various postharvest no-till treatments containing glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine]. After 4 yr, populations of winter annual Cruciferae spp. at one location were lower in treatments that had poorer control of summer annual weeds or volunteer wheat. At a second location, winter annual broadleaf species were more numerous in conventionally tilled than in no-till treatments. Wheat yields obtained with no-till treatments were lower than yields obtained with conventional tillage in seasons favorable for high yields.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Black, A. L. and Power, J. F. 1965. Effect of chemical and mechanical fallow methods on moisture storage, wheat yields, and soil erodibility. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 29:465468.Google Scholar
2. Cleary, C. L. and Peeper, T. F. 1979. Weed control for no-till continuous wheat. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 32:41.Google Scholar
3. Crosson, P. 1981. Conservation tillage and conventional tillage: A comparative assessment. Soil Con. Soc. of Amer. 35.Google Scholar
4. Daniel, H. A., Cox, M. B., and Elwell, H. M. Stubble mulch and other cultural practices for moisture conservation and wheat production at the Wheatland Conservation Experiment Station, Cherokee, Oklahoma, 1942-1951. U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., Production Research Report No. 6, October 1956. 44.Google Scholar
5. Daniel, H. A., Elwell, H. M., and Cox, M. B. Conservation and land use investigations at the Red Plains Conservation Experiment Station, Guthrie, Oklahoma and the Wheatland Conservation Experiment Station, Cherokee, Oklahoma, Okla. Agri. Exp. Stn. Bull. B-309, May, 1947, pages 1415.Google Scholar
6. Davidson, J. M. and Santelmann, P. W. An evaluation of various tillage systems for wheat. Oklahoma Agri. Exp. Stn. Bull. B-711, 1973. 17.Google Scholar
7. Fenster, C. R., Domingo, C. E., and Burnside, O. C. 1969. Weed control and plant residue maintance with various tillage treatments in a winter wheat-fallow rotation. Agron. J. 61:256259.Google Scholar
8. Fenster, C. R., Woodruff, N. P., Chepil, W. S., and Siddoway, F. H. 1965. Performance of tillage implements in a stubble mulch system: III. Effects of tillage sequence on residues, soil clodiness, weed control, and wheat yield. Agron. J. 57:5255.Google Scholar
9. Flint, E. P., Elmore, C. D., and Clarke, L. E. 1981. Survey of weed communities in Delta cotton and soybeans: methods and preliminary results. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 34:277.Google Scholar
10. Froud-Williams, R. J., Chancellor, R. J., and Drennan, D.S.H. 1981. Potential changes in weed floras associated with reduced-cultivation systems for cereal production in temperate regions. Weed Res. 21:99109.Google Scholar
11. Greb, B. W. Reducing drought effects on cropland in the west central Great Plains. U.S. Dep. Agric.–Sci. Ed. Adm. Agric. Info. Bull. No. 420, 1979, 6.Google Scholar
12. Harper, H. J. Four experiments relating to primary tillage methods for winter wheat. Okla. Agric. Exp. Stn. Processed Ser. p.-333. October 1959. 8.Google Scholar
13. Harris, W. W. 1963. Effects of residue management, rotations, and nitrogen fertilizer on small grain production in northwestern Kansas. Agron. J. 55:281284.Google Scholar
14. Hoefer, R. H., Wicks, G. A., and Burnside, O. C. 1981. Grain yields, soil water storage, and weed growth in a winter wheat-corn-fallow rotation. Agron. J. 73:10661071.Google Scholar
15. Pollard, F. and Cussans, C. W. 1981. The influence of tillage on the weed flora in a succession of winter ceral crops on a sandy loam soil. Weed Res. 21:185190.Google Scholar
16. Runyan, T. J. and Peeper, T. F. 1979. Variables affecting efficacy and phytotoxicity of metribuzin to winter wheat. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 32:40.Google Scholar
17. Rushing, D. W. and Peeper, T. F. 1981. Reduced tillage using herbicides in a continuous winter wheat cropping system. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 34:93.Google Scholar
18. Smika, D. E., Black, A. L., and Greb, B. W. 1969. Soil nitrate, soil water, and grain yields in a wheat-fallow rotation in the Great Plains as influenced by straw mulch. Agron. J. 61:785787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Thullen, R. J. and Keeley, P. E. 1980. Competition between yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli var. frumentacea). Weed Sci. 28:2426.Google Scholar
20. Tucker, B. B., Cox, M. B., and Eck, H. V. 1971. Effect of rotations, tillage methods, and N fertilization on winter wheat production. Agron. J. 63:699702.Google Scholar