Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T12:28:00.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Wild Oat (Avena fatua) Infestations on Light Interception and Growth Rate of Wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David W. Cudney ,
Lowell S. Jordan  and
Anthony E. Hall
David W. Cudney
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot. and Plant Sci., Univ. California, Riverside, CA 92521
Lowell S. Jordan
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot. and Plant Sci., Univ. California, Riverside, CA 92521
Anthony E. Hall
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot. and Plant Sci., Univ. California, Riverside, CA 92521
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Wild oat reduced light penetration and growth of dwarf hard red spring wheat in field experiments performed under nonlimiting nitrogen and moisture conditions. Wild oat grew taller than wheat and had a greater portion of its canopy above 60 cm at maturity. Light penetration in a mixed canopy was similar to that in a monoculture wheat canopy when wild oat was clipped to the height of the wheat. A mathematical model was developed which accurately predicted the reduction in the growth rate of wheat from wild oat interference. The model also predicted that interference from wild oat was due to reduced leaf area of wheat at early growth stages and low wild oat densities, and reduced light penetration to wheat leaves at later growth stages and higher densities of wild oat.

Keywords

Wild oat, Avena fatua L. # AVEFAwheat, Triticum aestivum L. ‘Anza’Canopy distributionleaf areaAVEFA
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , June 1991 , pp. 175 - 179
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bauer, A., Fanning, C., Enz, J. W., and Eberlein, C. V. 1984. Use of growing-degree days to determine spring wheat growth stages. North Dakota State Univ. Coop. Ext. Bull. 14 Agr-1.Google Scholar
2. Carlson, H. L. and Hill, J. E. 1985. Wild oat (Avena fatua) competition with spring wheat: plant density effects. Weed Sci. 33:176–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Carlson, H. L. and Hill, J. E. 1986. Wild oat (Avena fatua) competition with spring wheat: Effects of nitrogen fertilization. Weed Sci. 34:29–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Fliervoet, L. M. and Weger, M.J.A. 1984. Canopy structure and microclimate of two wet grassland communities. New Phytol. 96:116—130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Haun, J. R. 1973. Visual quantification of wheat development. Agron. J. 65:116–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Henson, J. and Jordan, L. S. 1982. Wild oat (Avena fatua) competition with wheat (Triticum aestivum and T. turgidum) for nitrate. Weed Sci. 30:297–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Hipps, L. E., Asrar, G., and Kanemasu, E. T. 1983. Assessing the interception of photosynthetically active radiation in winter wheat. Agric. Meteorol. 28:253–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Rickman, R. W., Klepper, B. L., and Peterson, C. M. 1985. Wheat seeding growth and developmental response to incident photosynthetically active radiation. Agron. J. 77:283–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Schreiber, M. M., Miles, G. E., Holt, D. A., and Bula, R. J. 1978. Sensitivity analysis of SIMED. Agron. J. 70:106–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Thurston, J. M. and Philipson, A. 1976. Distribution. Pages 19—64 in Jones, D. P., ed. Wild Oats in World Agriculture. Agric. Res. Counc., London.Google Scholar
11. Walker, G. K., Blackshaw, R. E., and Dekker, J. 1988. Leaf area and competition for light between plant species using direct sunlight transmission. Weed Technol. 2:159–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Warren-Wilson, J. 1959. Inclined point quadrats. New Phytol. 59:1–8.Google Scholar
13. Warren-Wilson, J. 1966. Stand structure and light penetration. I. analysis of point quadrats. J. Appl. Ecol. 3:383–390.Google Scholar
14. Williams, W. A. 1963. Competition for light between annual species of Trifolium during the vegetative phase. Ecology 44:475–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar