Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T02:00:49.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of Postemergence and Subsurface Layered Herbicides on Horsenettle and Peanuts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

P.A. Banks
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74074
M.A. Kirby
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74074
P.W. Santelmann
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74074

Abstract

Postemergence herbicide treatments that were most effective for controlling horsenettle (Solarium carolinense L.) were glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine], dicamba (3,6-dichloro-o-anisic acid), silvex [2-(2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy)-propionic acid], and picloram (4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid). All exhibited good to excellent long term control of the horsenettle plant when applied annually for at least 2 yr. Picloram and glyphosate both provided better control of horsenettle when applied at a postbloom or fruiting stage of growth. Dicamba and picloram also were very effective in controlling horsenettle when used as a subsurface layer (SSL) treatment. However, all of these treatments caused visual injury to peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.). Applications of 2,4-DB [4-(2,4-dichorophenoxy)butyric acid] were effective in causing an 80 to 90% fruiting inhibition of horsenettle plants when applied at a prebloom stage of growth, with no damage to the peanuts. Applications of several dinitroaniline herbicides as SSL treatments exhibited some control of horsenettle with little crop injury. Postemergence treatments which effectively controlled seedling horsenettle plants grown in the greenhouse were glyphosate and dinoseb (2-sec-butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1977 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Albert, W.B. 1960. Control of horsenettle (Solanum carolinense) in pastures. Weed Sci. 8:680.Google Scholar
2. Alley, H.P., Lee, G.A., and Gale, A.F. 1973. Evaluation of subsurface layered herbicides for control of field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis L.). Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 26:23.Google Scholar
3 Banks, P.A., Hill, L., and Santelmann, P.W. 1975. Subsurface layering of dinitroaniline herbicides for horsenettle control. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 28:44.Google Scholar
4. Boyle, L.W. 1956. Cultural practices with respect to peanut yields and control of southern blight and root rot on peanuts. Plant Dis. Rep. 40:661665.Google Scholar
5. Bradburg, H.E. and Aldrich, R.J. 1956. A study of horsenettle (Solanum carolinense) and its control. Proc. Northeast. Weed Control Conf. 10:232233.Google Scholar
6. Cooley, A.W. and Smith, D.T. 1973. Silverleaf nightshade response to glyphosate. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 26:59.Google Scholar
7. Derting, C.W., Andrews, O.N. Jr., Duncan, R.G., and Frost, K.R. Jr. 1973. Two years of perennial weed control investigations with glyphosate. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 26:4450.Google Scholar
8. Friesen, H.A. 1958. Other perennial weeds. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 15:57.Google Scholar
9. Ilnicki, R.D. and Fertig, S.N. 1962. Life history studies as related to weed control in the Northeast. Horsenettle. Agric. Exp. Sta., Univ. of Rhode Island. Bull. 368, 27 pp.Google Scholar
10. Kirby, M.G. and Santelmann, P.W. 1974. Effect of postemergence herbicides on Carolina horsenettle. Proc. South Weed Sci. Soc. 27:58.Google Scholar
11. Matthiesen, R.L. and Santelmann, P.W. 1972. Treatments for the control of horsenettle in peanuts. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 25:128.Google Scholar
12. Woodruff, J.G. 1966. Peanuts: Production, processing, products. ABI Publishing Co., Inc. Westport, CT. Pages 265266.Google Scholar