Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T04:26:52.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of soybean row width and velvetleaf emergence time on velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Shawn M. Hock ,
Stevan Z. Knezevic ,
Alex R. Martin  and
John L. Lindquist
Shawn M. Hock
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0915
Alex R. Martin
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0915
John L. Lindquist
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0915
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Row spacing and the relative time of velvetleaf emergence affects the time of soybean canopy closure relative to velvetleaf, influencing the growth and development of velvetleaf. Field studies were conducted in northeastern Nebraska in 2002 and 2003 to describe velvetleaf growth as influenced by soybean presence or absence (velvetleaf grown with soybean or in monoculture), soybean row spacing (19 and 76 cm), and relative time of velvetleaf emergence. Velvetleaf seed production, leaf area (LA), and total dry matter (TDM) were greater in 76-cm- than in 19-cm-wide soybean rows. LA, TDM, and seed production of velvetleaf were reduced with later emergence times in both monoculture and with soybean. Velvetleaf LA, TDM, and seed production decreased when grown with soybean compared with when grown in monoculture. Practical implications of this study suggest that narrowing crop row spacing and controlling early-emerging velvetleaf in soybean can be an effective part of an integrated weed management strategy.

Keywords

Velvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti ABUTHsoybean, Glycine max (L.) MerrIntegrated weed managementplant architecturevelvetleaf growthweed emergenceweed seed production
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 53 , Issue 2 , April 2005 , pp. 160 - 165
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Akey, W. C., Jurik, T. W., and Dekker, J. 1990. Competition for light between velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) and soybean (Glycine max). Weed Res 30:403–411.Google Scholar
Cudney, D. W., Jordan, L. S., and Hall, A. E. 1991. Effect of wild oat (Avena fatua) infestations on light interception and growth rate of wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci 39:175–179.Google Scholar
Dekker, J. and Meggitt, W. F. 1983. Interference between velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medic.) and soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). I. Growth. Weed Res 23:91–101.Google Scholar
Egley, G. H. and Williams, R. D. 1991. Emergence periodicity of six summer annual weed species. Weed Sci 4:595–600.Google Scholar
Gomez, A. K. and Gomez, A. A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd ed. An International Rice Research Institute Book. New York: Wiley-Interscience. Pp. 108–116.Google Scholar
Haizel, K. A. 1972. The canopy relationship of pure and mixed populations of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), white mustard (Sinapsis alba L.) and wild oats (Avena fatua L). J. Appl. Ecol 9:589–600.Google Scholar
Heindl, J. C. and Brun, W. A. 1983. Light and shade effects on abscission and 14C-photoassimilate partitioning among reproductive structures in soybean. Plant Physiol 73:434–439.Google Scholar
Heindl, J. C. and Brun, W. A. 1984. Patterns of reproductive abscission, seed yield and yield components in soybean. Crop Sci 24:542–545.Google Scholar
Knezevic, S. Z., Evans, S. P., Blankenship, E. E., van Acker, R. C., and Lindquist, J. L. 2002. Critical period for weed control: the concept and data analysis. Weed Sci 50:773–786.Google Scholar
Knezevic, S. Z., Evans, S. P., and Mainz, M. 2003a. Row spacing influences the critical timing for weed removal in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 17:666–673.Google Scholar
Knezevic, S. Z., Evans, S. P., and Mainz, M. 2003b. Yield Penalty Due to Delayed Weed Control in Corn and Soybean. [Crop Management Journal Online]. www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/pub/cm/research/2003/delay/.Google Scholar
Knezevic, S. Z. and Horak, M. J. 1998. Influence of emergence time and density on redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus). Weed Sci 46:665–672.Google Scholar
Légère, A. and Schreiber, M. M. 1989. Competition and canopy architecture as affected by soybean (Glycine max) row width and density of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus). Weed Sci 37:84–92.Google Scholar
Lindquist, J. L., Maxwell, B. D., Buhler, D. D., and Gunsolus, J. L. 1995. Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) recruitment, survival, seed production, and interference in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci 43:226–232.Google Scholar
Lindquist, J. L. and Mortensen, D. A. 1998. Tolerance and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) suppressive ability of two old and two modern corn (Zea mays) hybrids. Weed Sci 46:569–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindquist, J. L. and Mortensen, D. A. 1999. Ecophysiological characteristics of four maize hybrids and Abutilon theophrasti . Weed Res 39:271–285.Google Scholar
Lindquist, J. L., Mortensen, D. A., and Johnson, B. E. 1998. Mechanisms of corn tolerance and velvetleaf suppressive ability. Agron. J 90:787–792.Google Scholar
McDonald, A. J. and Riha, S. J. 1999. Model of crop: weed competition applied to maize: Abutilon theophrasti interactions. I. Model description and evaluation. Weed Res 39:355–369.Google Scholar
Mitich, L. W. 1991. Velvetleaf. Weed Technol 5:253–255.Google Scholar
Mulugeta, D. and Boerboom, C. M. 2000. Critical time of weed removal in glyphosate-resistant Glycine max . Weed Sci 48:35–42.Google Scholar
Ngouajio, M., McGiffen, M. E. Jr., and Hembree, K. J. 2001. Tolerance of tomato cultivars to velvetleaf interference. Weed Sci 49:91–98.Google Scholar
Patterson, D. T. 1992. Temperature and canopy development of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) and soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 6:68–76.Google Scholar
Pyon, J. Y., Guh, J. O., and Ku, Y. C. 1997. Environment-friendly cultural and mechanical practices for weed management. Korean J. Weed Sci 17:124–134.Google Scholar
Regnier, E. E. and Harrison, S. K. 1993. Compensatory responses of common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) to partial shading. Weed Sci 41:541–547.Google Scholar
Regnier, E. E. and Stoller, E. W. 1989. The effects of soybean (Glycine max) interference on the canopy architecture of common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium), jimsonweed (Datura stramonium), and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci 37:187–195.Google Scholar
Ritchie, S. W., Hanway, J. J., and Benson, G. O. 1993. How a Soybean Plant Develops. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Special Rep. 53. 20 p.Google Scholar
Sailsbury, C. D. and Chandler, J. M. 1993. Interaction of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) plants for water is affected by their interaction for light. Weed Sci 41:69–74.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1999. SAS OnLine Doc. Version 8. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.Google Scholar
Sato, S., Tateno, K., and Kobayashi, R. 1994. Influence of seeding date on flowering and seed production of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medic). Weed Res. Jpn 39:243–248.Google Scholar
Smith, B. S., Murray, D. S., and Weeks, D. L. 1990. Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) interference with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol 4:799–803.Google Scholar
Swanton, C. J. and Weise, S. W. 1991. Integrated weed management: the rationale and approach. Weed Technol 5:687–663.Google Scholar
Walker, R. H. and Buchanan, G. A. 1982. Crop manipulation in integrated weed management systems. Weed Sci 30:(Suppl. 1). 17–23.Google Scholar
Warwick, S. I. and Black, L. D. 1988. The biology of Canadian weeds. 90. Abutilon theophrasti . Can. J. Plant Sci 68:1069–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, M. M. II, Mortensen, D. A., and Doran, J. W. 1998. Assessment of weed and crop fitness in cover crop residues for integrated weed management. Weed Technol 46:595–603.Google Scholar