Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-495rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-29T05:12:05.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interaction of Propanil with Insecticides Absorbed from Soil and Translocated into Rice Plants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

A. R. El-Refai
Affiliation:
University of Al-Azhar, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo, Egypt
M. Mowafy
Affiliation:
Pesticides Laboratory, Ministry of Agriculture, Cairo, Egypt

Abstract

Investigations were undertaken to ascertain whether residues of soil-applied carbaryl (1-naphthyl N-methyl carbamate) and diazinon [O,O-diethyl-O-(2-isopropyl-4-methyl-6-pyrimidyl) phosphorothioate] insecticides may be absorbed from the soil and translocated to foliage of rice (Oryza sativa L. ‘Nahda’) and to determine the phytotoxic interaction between them and foliar-applied propanil (3′,4′-dichloropropionanilide). Results from greenhouse studies showed that carbaryl and diazinon were translocated and affected hydrolytic activity in rice shoots at all rates of application. Carbaryl was more inhibitory but diazinon persisted longer in the soil. When propanil was applied in the presence of diazinon, no additive phytotoxicity occurred on rice plants over that occurring from propanil alone. Synergistic effects in rice, resulting in dry weight loss, were marked when soil was treated with 5 mg of diazinon per kilogram of soil and subsequently sprayed with propanil. Synergistic phytotoxicity was apparent when propanil was applied 1 day after carbaryl treatment and most plants were killed. Slight injury was noticed on plants treated with propanil 2 weeks after carbaryl treatment at 1 and 5 mg/kg.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1973 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bowling, C. C. and Hudgins, H. R. 1966. The effect of insecticides on the selectivity of propanil on rice. Weeds 14:9495.Google Scholar
2. Bowling, C. C. and Flincum, W. T. 1968. Interaction of propanil with insecticides applied as seed treatments on rice. J. Econ. Entomol. 16:6799.Google Scholar
3. Chang, F. Y., Smith, L. W., and Stephenson, G. R. 1971. Insecticide inhibition of herbicide metabolism in leaf tissues. J. Agr. Food Chem. 19:11831186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Frear, D. S. and Still, G. G. 1968. The metabolism of 3,4-dichloropropionanilide in plants. Partial purification and properties of an aryl acylamidase from rice. Phytochemistry 7:913920.Google Scholar
5. Getzin, L. W. and Rosefield, I. 1966. Persistence of diazinon and Zinophos in soils. J. Econ. Entomol. 59:512520.Google Scholar
6. Johnson, D. P. and Stansbury, H. R. 1965. Adaptation of Sevin insecticide (carbaryl) residue method to various crops. J. Agr. Food Chem. 13:235238.Google Scholar
7. Lichtenstein, E. P. and Fuhremann, T. W. 1967. Effects of the detergent LAS translocation and plant growth. J. Agr. Food. Chem. 15:864869.Google Scholar
8. Matsunaka, S. 1968. Propanil hydrolysis : Inhibition in rice plants by insecticides. Science 160:13601361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Still, G. G. and Kuzirian, O. 1967. Enzyme detoxication of 3,4-dichloropropionanilide in rice and barnyard grass, a factor in herbicide selectivity. Nature 215:799800.Google Scholar
10. Yih, R. Y., McRae, D. H., and Wilson, H. F. 1968. Metabolism of 3,4-dichloropropionanilide : 3,4-dichloroanilinelignin complex. Science 161:376377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar