Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-19T20:12:37.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Morphological and Histological Effects of Sethoxydim on Corn (Zea mays) Seedlings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Hideo Hosaka
Affiliation:
Nisso Institute for Life Science, Nippon Soda Co., Ltd., 930 Oiso, 255 Kanagawa, Japan
Hideo Inaba
Affiliation:
Nisso Institute for Life Science, Nippon Soda Co., Ltd., 930 Oiso, 255 Kanagawa, Japan
Atsushi Satoh
Affiliation:
Nisso Institute for Life Science, Nippon Soda Co., Ltd., 930 Oiso, 255 Kanagawa, Japan
Hisao Ishikawa
Affiliation:
Nisso Institute for Life Science, Nippon Soda Co., Ltd., 930 Oiso, 255 Kanagawa, Japan

Abstract

The herbicidal action of sethoxydim {2-[1-(ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-one} on corn (Zea mays L. ‘Goldencrossbantam’) was investigated in preemergence and postemergence experiments and hydroponic culture. Soil-applied sethoxydim did not inhibit corn germination. Leaves failed to emerge through the coleoptile with a high herbicide rate (1.6 kg ai/ha), but chlorotic leaves emerged at a lower rate (0.8 kg ai/ha). Growth of corn seedlings treated with a foliar application of 0.2 kg ai/ha was inhibited within 1 day after treatment, but at a lower application rate (0.05 kg ai/ha) growth continued with chlorotic zones on newly expanding leaves. Over the concentration range 3 × 10-5 to 1 × 10-6 M, sethoxydim inhibited the growth of primary roots of corn in hydroponic culture within 24 h. Cytological investigation showed that sethoxydim inhibited cell division but did not interfere with mitosis.

Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Asare-Boamah, N. K. and Fletcher, R. A. 1983. Physiological and cytological effects of BAS 9052 OH on corn (Zea mays) seedlings. Weed Sci. 31:4955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Bayer, D. E., Foy, C. L., Mallory, T. E., and Cutter, E. G. 1967. Morphological and histological effects of trifluralin on root development. Am. J. Bot. 54:945952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Ennis, W. B. 1948. Some cytological effects of O-isopropyl N-phenyl carbamate upon Avena. Am. J. Bot. 35:1521.Google Scholar
4. Ishikawa, H., Yamada, S., Hosaka, H., Kawana, T., and Kohara, K. 1982. Sethoxydim and related compounds: Their chemical structures and herbicidal activities. Abstr. 5th Int. Congr. Pest. Chem. IIc–8.Google Scholar
5. Johnsey, P. S. and Harger, T. R. 1982. Visible and microscopic effects of BAS 9052 OH on johnsongrass [Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers.] and itchgrass (Rottboellia exaltata L.f.). Abstr. Weed Sci. Sci. Soc. Am. Pages 8586.Google Scholar
6. Lignowski, E. M. and Scott, E. G. 1972. Effect of trifluralin on mitosis. Weed Sci. 20:267270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Shibayama, H. and Worley, J. F. 1976. Growth responses of barnyardgrass and bearded sprangletop seedlings to benthiocarb. Weed Sci. 24:276281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Swisher, B. A. and Corbin, F. T. 1982. Behavior of BAS 9052 OH in soybean (Glycine max) and johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) plant and cell cultures. Weed Sci. 30:640650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar