Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T06:04:16.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Oximes as Seed Safeners for Grain Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) to Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Tsern-Shi Chang
Affiliation:
Dep. Soil and Crop Sci., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843
Morris G. Merkle
Affiliation:
Dep. Soil and Crop Sci., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843

Abstract

Studies in growth chambers indicated that CGA-43089 {α-[(cyanomethoxy)imino] benzeneacetonitrile} applied at a rate of 1.25 g/kg of seed reduced the phytotoxicity of metolachlor [2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)acetamide], bensulide [o,o-diisopropyl phosphorodithioate S-ester with N-(2-mercaptoethyl) benzenesulfonamide], EPTC (S-ethyl dipropylthiocarbamate), UBI-S734 {2-[(1,2,5-dimethylphenyl)ethylsulfonyl] pyridine N-oxide} and MBR-18337 {N-[4-(ethylthio)-2-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl] methanesulfonamide} to grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] during seed germination and seedling emergence. The protected sorghum tolerated metolachlor over a wider range of rates than it tolerated the other herbicides. CGA-43089 did not protect sorghum from the phytotoxicity of trifluralin (α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-p-toluidine). Of seven other oximes tested as seed treatments, dimethylglyoxime, benzophenone oxime, pyridine-2-aldoxime, benzoin-α-oxime, and methyl thioacetohydroxamate showed promise for increasing the tolerance of grain sorghum to metolachlor. In general, higher rates of these oximes than the rate of CGA-43089 were required for equivalent protection of sorghum.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1982 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Aldridge, W. N. and Reiner, E. 1972. Enzyme Inhibitors as Substrates. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam. 328 pp.Google Scholar
2. Ashton, F. M., Penner, D., and Hoffman, S. 1968. Effect of several herbicides on proteolytic activity of squash seedlings. Weed Sci. 16:169171.Google Scholar
3. Cohen, W. and Erlanger, B. F. 1960. Studies on the reactivation of diethylphosphorylchymotrypsin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 82:39283934.Google Scholar
4. Cohen, W., Lache, M., and Erlanger, B. F. 1962. The reactivation of diethylphosphoryltrypsin. Biochemistry. 1:686693.Google Scholar
5. Duke, W. B., Slife, F. W., Hanson, J. B., and Butler, H. B. 1975. An investigation on the mechanism of action of propachlor. Weed Sci. 23:142147.Google Scholar
6. Ellis, J. E., Peek, J. W., Boehle, J. Jr., and Muller, G. 1980. Effectiveness of a new safener for protecting sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) from metolachlor injury. Weed Sci. 28:15.Google Scholar
7. Engelhard, N., Prchal, K., and Nenner, M. 1967. Acetylcholinesterase. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 6:615626.Google Scholar
8. Ketchersid, M. L., Norton, K., and Merkle, M. G. 1981. Influence of soil moisture on the safening effect of CGA-43089 in grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor . Weed Sci. 29:281287.Google Scholar
9. Moreland, D. E., Malhotra, S. S., Gruenhagen, R. D., and Shokrah, E. H. 1969. Effects of herbicides on RNA and protein synthesis. Weed Sci. 17:556563.Google Scholar
10. Nyffeler, A., Gerber, H. R., and Hensley, J. R. 1980. Laboratory studies on the behavior of the herbicide safener CGA-43089. Weed Sci. 28:610.Google Scholar
11. Sivaji Rao, V. and Duke, W. B. 1976. Effect of alachlor, propachlor and prynachlor on gibberellic acid-induced production of protease and α-amylase. Weed Sci. 24:616618.Google Scholar