Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-tsvsl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T02:06:02.470Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Persistence of Benzoic and Phenylacetic Acids in Soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

T. J. Sheets ,
J. W. Smith  and
D. D. Kaufman
T. J. Sheets
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland
J. W. Smith
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland
D. D. Kaufman
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a greenhouse experiment, dosages of 2-methoxy-3,6-dichlorobenzoic acid [dicamba] and 2-methoxy-3,5,6-trichlorobenzoic acid [tricamba] required initially to reduce fresh weights of snap beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) 50% (hereinafter referred to as ED50 values) increased as clay and organic matter increased in five soils. In all soils, 2,3,6-trichlorobenzoic acid [2,3,6-TBA] was about equally toxic, but ED50 values for 2,3,6-trichlorophenylacetic acid [fenac] and 2-methoxy-3,6-dichlorophenylacetic acid [hereinafter referred to as methoxy fenac] decreased as clay and organic matter increased. Under experimental conditions of alternately moist and dry soil, phytotoxicity of dicamba, tricamba, and methoxy fenac decreased with time, but that of 2,3,6-TBA and fenac remained approximately the same for about 22 months. When soils were maintained moist throughout the incubation period, 3-amino-2,5-dichlorobenzoic acid [amiben] was least persistent, dicamba intermediate, and 2,3,6-TBA and fenac most; under these conditions, phytotoxic effects of 2,3,6-TBA and fenac decreased with time. In soil-enrichment studies, fenac, methoxy fenac, dicamba, and 2,3,6-TBA, in comparison with 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid [2,4-D], appeared very resistant to microbial degradation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , April 1968 , pp. 217 - 222
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Alexander, M. and Aleem, M. I. H. 1961. Effect of chemical structure on microbial decomposition of aromatic herbicides. J. Agr. Food Chem. 9:44–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Audus, L. J. 1949. The biological detoxication of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid in soil. Plant and Soil 2:31–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Bounds, H. C. and Colmer, A. R. 1965. Detoxification of some herbicides by Streptomyces . Weeds 13:249–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Burnside, O. C. 1965. Longevity of amiben, atrazine, and 2,3,6-TBA in incubated soils. Weeds 13:274–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Burnside, O. C., Wicks, G. A., and Fenster, C. R. 1965. Herbicide longevity in Nebraska soils. Weeds 13:277–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Burnside, O. C., Wicks, G. A., and Fenster, C. R. 1963. The effect of rainfall and soil type on the disappearance of 2,3,6-TBA. Weeds 11:45–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Dewey, O. R. and Pfeiffer, R. K. 1959. Soil persistence and biological breakdown of 2,3,6-trichlorobenzoic acid. Mededel. Landbouwhogeschool Opzoekingsst. Staat Gent 24:899–904.Google Scholar
8. Donaldson, T. W. and Foy, C. L. 1965. The phytotoxicity and persistence in soils of benzoic acid herbicides. Weeds 13:195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Dowler, C. C., Sand, P. F., and Robinson, E. L. 1963. The effect of soil type on preplanting soil-incorporated herbicides for witch weed control. Weeds 11:276–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Friesen, H. A. 1965. The movement and persistence of dicamba in soil. Weeds 13:30–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Iwasaki, I., Utsumi, S., and Ozawa, T. 1952. New colorimetric determination of chloride using mercuric thiocyanate and ferric ion. Bull. Chem. Soc. Japan, 22:226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Kaufman, D. D. 1966. An inexpensive, positive pressure, soil perfusion system. Weeds 14:90–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Kaufman, D. D. and Sheets, T. J. 1965. Microbial decomposition of pesticide combinations. Agron. Abstr. p. 85.Google Scholar
14. MacRae, I. C. and Alexander, M. 1965. Microbial degradation of selected herbicides in soil. J. Agr. Food Chem. 13:72–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Phillips, W. M. 1959. Residual herbicidal activity of some chlorosubstituted benzoic acids in soil. Weeds 7:284–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Rauser, W. E. and Switzer, C. M. 1962. Factors contributing to the loss of amiben phytotoxicity in soils. Weeds 10:62–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Schliebe, K. A., Burnside, O. C., and Lavy, T. L. 1965. Dissipation of amiben. Weeds 13:321–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Sheets, T. J. 1963. Photochemical alteration and inactivation of amiben. Weeds 11:186–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Sheets, T. J., Crafts, A. S., and Drever, H. R. 1962. Influence of soil properties on the phytotoxicities of the s-triazine herbicides. J. Agr. Food Chem. 10:458–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar