Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T13:29:24.491Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Shoot and Root Interference of Common Cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) and Soybean (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Robert C. Bozsa  and
Lawrence R. Oliver
Robert C. Bozsa
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
Lawrence R. Oliver
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in 1986 and 1987 to determine the effects of shoot and root interference of common cocklebur and soybean. Plants were grown in porous membrane envelopes. Common cocklebur plants had a longer vegetative growth period than soybean and were twice as tall as soybean at maturity. Soybean root and shoot dry weight and seed yield were reduced by shoot and whole plant (root and shoot) interference of common cocklebur, with whole plant interference giving the greatest reduction. Common cocklebur growth was affected little by soybean interference. Common cocklebur shoot interference alone reduced total soybean seed weight by 48%, the amount caused by common cocklebur whole plant interference.

Keywords

Common cocklebur, Xanthium strumarium L. #3 XANSTsoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Forrest’Porous membrane techniquecompetitionXANST
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , March 1993 , pp. 34 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Aspinall, D. 1960. An analysis of competition between barley and white persicaria. Ann. Appl. Biol. 48:637–654.Google Scholar
2. Barrentine, W. L. 1974. Common cocklebur competition in soybeans. Weed Sci. 22:600–603.Google Scholar
3. Barrentine, W. L. and Oliver, L. R. 1977. Competition threshold levels and control of cocklebur in soybeans. Miss. Agric. Exp. Stn. and Ark. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. No. 83. 27 pp.Google Scholar
4. Bloomberg, J. R., Kirkpatrick, B. L., and Wax, L. M. 1982. Competition of common cocklebur with soybean. Weed Sci. 30:507–513.Google Scholar
5. Brown, D. A. and Haq, A. 1984. A porous membrane-root culture technique for growing plants under controlled soil conditions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 48:692–695.Google Scholar
6. Brown, D. A. and Scott, H. D. 1984. Dependence of crop growth and yield on root development and activity. Pages 101–136 in Roots, nutrients and water influx, and plant growth. Soil Sci. Soc. Am., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
7. Chapin, F. S. III. 1980. The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 11:233–260.Google Scholar
8. Cook, S. J. and Ratcliff, D. 1984. A study of the effects of root and shoot competition on the growth of green panic (Panicum maximum var. trichoglume) seedlings in an existing grassland using root exclusion tubes. J. Appl. Ecol. 21:971–982.Google Scholar
9. Davis, R. G., Johnson, W. C., and Wood, F. O. 1967. Weed root profiles. Agron. J. 59:555–556.Google Scholar
10. Davis, R. G., Wiese, A. F., and Pafford, J. L. 1965. Root moisture extraction profiles of various weeds. Weeds 13:98–100.Google Scholar
11. Donald, C. M. 1951. Competition among pasture plants. I. Intraspecific competition among annual pasture plants. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 2:355–376.Google Scholar
12. Donald, C. M. 1958. The interaction of competition for light and for nutrients. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 9:421–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Eagles, C. F. 1972. Competition for light and nutrients between natural populations of Dactylis glomerata . J. Appl. Ecol. 9:141–151.Google Scholar
14. Eaton, B. J., Russ, O. G., and Feltner, K. C. 1976. Competition of velvetleaf, prickly sida, and venice mallow in soybeans. Weed Sci. 24:224–228.Google Scholar
15. Geddes, R. D., Scott, H. D., and Oliver, L. R. 1979. Growth and water use by common cocklebur and soybeans under field conditions. Weed Sci. 27:206–212.Google Scholar
16. Gliessman, S. R. 1983. Allelopathic interactions in crop-weed mixtures: Applications for weed management. J. Chem. Ecol. 9:991–999.Google Scholar
17. Hall, R. L. 1974. Analysis of the nature of interference between plants of different species. I. Concepts and extension of the de Wit analysis to examine effects. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 25:739–747.Google Scholar
18. Martin, M.P.L.D. and Snaydon, R. W. 1982. Root and shoot interactions between barley and field beans when intercropped. J. Appl. Ecol. 9:263–272.Google Scholar
19. McWhorter, C. G. and Hartwig, E. E. 1972. Competition of johnsongrass and cocklebur with six soybean varieties. Weed Sci. 20:56–59.Google Scholar
20. Monks, D. W., Oliver, L. R., and Bozsa, R. C. 1988. Seedling growth of soybeans and selected weeds. Weed Sci. 36:167–171.Google Scholar
21. Oliver, L. R., Frans, R. E., and Talbert, R. E. 1976. Field competition between tall morningglory and soybean. I. Growth analysis. Weed Sci. 24:482–488.Google Scholar
22. Patterson, D. T. and Flint, E. P. 1983. Comparative water relations, photosynthesis, and growth of soybean and seven associated weeds. Weed Sci. 31:318–323.Google Scholar
23. Schreiber, M. M. 1967. A technique for studying weed competition in forage legume establishment. Weeds 15:1–4.Google Scholar
24. Scott, H. D. and Oliver, L. R. 1976. Field competition between tall morningglory and soybean. II. Development and distribution of root systems. Weed Sci. 24:454–460.Google Scholar
25. Shipley, J. L. and Wiese, A. F. 1969. Economics of weed control in sorghum and wheat. Tex. Agric. Exp. Stn. MP-909. 8 pp.Google Scholar
26. Snaydon, R. W. 1971. An analysis of competition between plants of Trifolium repens L. populations collected from contrasting soils. J. Appl. Econ. 8:687–697.Google Scholar
27. Snaydon, R. W. 1979. A new technique for studying plant interactions. J. Appl. Ecol. 16:281–286.Google Scholar
28. Snaydon, R. W. and Howe, C. D. 1986. Root and shoot competition between established ryegrass and invading grass seedlings. J. Appl. Ecol. 23:667–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. Stern, W. R. and Donald, C. M. 1962. The influence of leaf area and radiation on the growth of clover in swards. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 13:615–623.Google Scholar
30. Stoller, E. W. and Woolley, J. T. 1985. Competition for light by broadleaf weeds in soybeans. Weed Sci. 33:199–202.Google Scholar
31. Trenbath, B. R. and Harper, J. L. 1972. Neighbor effects in the genus Avena. I. Comparison of crop species. J. Appl. Ecol. 10:379–400.Google Scholar
32. Wiese, A. F. and Vandiver, C. W. 1970. Soil moisture effects on competitive ability of weeds. Weed Sci. 18:518–519.Google Scholar