Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-w7rtg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-01T08:23:55.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Site of Uptake and Translocation of 14C-Buthidazole in Corn (Zea mays) and Redroot Pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Kriton K. Hatzios
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop and Soil Sci., Pestic. Res. Cntr., Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824
Donald Penner
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop and Soil Sci., Pestic. Res. Cntr., Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824

Abstract

Uptake and translocation of 14C-buthidazole {3-[5-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl]-4-hydroxy-1-methyl-2-imidazolidinone} in corn (Zea mays L.) and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) were studied following both foliar and root treatments under greenhouse and growth chamber environments. Following foliar application, 14C-buthidazole was absorbed by the leaves of corn and redroot pigweed seedlings in similar amounts. Translocation occurred only toward the tip of the treated leaves in corn, whereas in redroot pigweed the 14C moved both acropetally and basipetally. Rapid uptake by the roots and rapid movement to the leaves via the xylem seems to be the main pathway of uptake and translocation of 14C-buthidazole supplied to the roots of redroot pigweed plants. Uptake by both the roots and the emerging coleoptile and transport to the foliage seems to be the pattern of absorption and translocation of buthidazole in corn following preemergence application. Differences in absorption did not appear to be an important factor contributing to selectivity of buthidazole between corn and redroot pigweed. However, translocation of 14C-buthidazole supplied to the roots was faster to the redroot pigweed shoots than to corn shoots.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1977. Experimental herbicide VEL-5026 for agricultural use. Tech. Inform. Bull., Velsicol Chem. Co., Chicago, Illinois. 5 pp.Google Scholar
2. Armstrong, T. F., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1973. Absorption, translocation and metabolism of alachlor by yellow nutsedge. Weed Sci. 21:357360.Google Scholar
3. Bandeen, J. D. and McLaren, R. D. 1976. Resistance of Chenopodium album to triazine herbicides. Can. J. Plant Sci. 56:411412.Google Scholar
4. Cornelius, A. J., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1978. Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus L.) control with acetanilide herbicides. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 18:1314.Google Scholar
5. Esau, K. 1977. Anatomy of Seed Plants, 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York. 550 pp.Google Scholar
6. Hatzios, K. K., Penner, D., and Bell, D. 1979. Inhibition of photosynthetic electron transport in isolated spinach chloroplasts by two 1,3,4-thiadiazolyl derivatives. Plant Physiol. Supp. 63:41.Google Scholar
7. Hilton, H. W. and Nomura, N. S. 1979. Metabolism of 14C-Vel 5026 in sugarcane plants treated via root and foliar application. Abstr. Am. Chem. Soc. 176th meeting. PEST 106.Google Scholar
8. Hoagland, D. R. and Arnon, D. I. 1950. The water culture method for growing plants without soil. California Agric. Exp. Stn. Circ. 347. 32 pp.Google Scholar
9. Peabody, D. 1973. Aatrex tolerant pigweed found in Washington. Weeds Today 4:17.Google Scholar
10. Ryan, G. I. 1970. Resistance of common groundsel to simazine and atrazine. Weed Sci. 18:614616.Google Scholar
11. Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. 1960. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw Hill, New York. 481 pp.Google Scholar