Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-jrqft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T06:50:28.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spatial and temporal expansion patterns of Apocynum cannabinum patches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Theodore M. Webster ,
John Cardina  and
Samuel J. Woods
John Cardina
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Ohio State University, Wooster, OH 44691
Samuel J. Woods
Affiliation:
Department Agricultural Technologies, Agricultural Technical Institute, Ohio State University, Wooster, OH 44691
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There is little information published on patch expansion of perennial weeds and none for Apocynum cannabinum. Studies were conducted to measure the between-season and in-season expansion patterns of natural A. cannabinum patches over three growing seasons. Regression analysis indicated strong relations between patch area in consecutive years 1996 to 1997 (r2 = 0.81) and 1997 to 1998 (r2 = 0.76). Patches less than 20 m2 in 1996 increased in area by more than 100% in 1997 during a fallow season. However, patches decreased in size 6 to 51% between 1997 and 1998 when Glycine max was grown. Evidence suggested that a late-season mowing of the A. cannabinum patches in 1997 contributed more to the decline in patch area than competition from G. max during the 1998 season. The relations between patch area and growing degree units (r2 = 0.97) indicated that greater than 89% of the terminal patch expansion occurred prior to the accumulation of 435 growing degree units (GDU) (June 19, 1997; May 31, 1998; June 9, 30-yr average), with minimal patch expansion between 435 and 1,000 GDU. Patches were at 50% of their final area on May 27, 1997, and May 14, 1998, a time when only 22% of the A. cannabinum population had emerged (r2 = 0.99). Knowledge of patch size and expansion could help growers time weed scouting, to account for the later emergence patterns of this species, as well as assist in timing appropriate weed management efforts. This information could also be used in conjunction with aerial photographs to project potential patch size for site-specific management of this weed.

Keywords

Apocynum cannabinum L. APCCA, hemp dogbaneGlycine max (L.) Merr., soybeanGDUgrowing degree unitspatch expansionperennial weedspatial dynamics
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 48 , Issue 6 , December 2000 , pp. 728 - 733
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Armor, R. L. and Harris, R. V. 1975. Seedling establishment and vegetative spread of Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. in Victoria, Australia. Weed Res. 15:407–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, R. L. and Fawcett, R. S. 1998. Seasonal carbohydrate fluctuations in hemp dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum) crown roots. Weed Sci. 46:358–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardina, J., Sparrow, D. H., and McCoy, E. L. 1995. Analysis of spatial distribution of common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) in no-till soybean (Glycine max) . Weed Sci. 43:258–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conservation Tillage Information Center. 2000. National crop residue management survey. http://www.ctic.purdue.edu/core4/ct/ctsurvey/sidesoy.htm. Accessed 2000 Aug 1.Google Scholar
Cousens, R. and Mortimer, M. 1995. Dynamics of Weed Populations. Cambridge, Great Britain: Cambridge University Press. 332 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerhards, R., Wyse-Pester, D. Y., Mortensen, D., and Johnson, G. A. 1997. Characterizing spatial stability of weed populations using interpolated maps. Weed Sci. 45:108–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, M. 1972. Spatial growth of Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. Weed Res. 12:373–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, M. 1973. Spatial growth of Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. Weed Res. 13:200–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loux, M. M. and Berry, M. A. 1991. Use of a grower survey for estimating weed problems. Weed Technol. 5:460–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loux, M. M., Stachler, J. M., and Harrison, S. K. 1998. Weed Control Guide for Ohio Field Crops. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Extension Bulletin 789. 136 p.Google Scholar
Schultz, M. E. and Burnside, O. C. 1979. Distribution, competition, and phenology of hemp dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum) in Nebraska. Weed Sci. 27:565–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, T. M. and Cardina, J. 1997. Accuracy of a global positioning system (GPS) for weed mapping. Weed Technol. 11:782–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, T. M. and Cardina, J. 1999. Apocynum cannabinum seed germination and vegetative shoot emergence. Weed Sci. 47:524–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, T. M., Cardina, J., and Woods, S. J. 2000. Apocynum cannabinum interference in no-till Glycine max . Weed Sci. 48:716–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, P. A., Bradbury, I. K., and Gross, R. S. 1980. The biology of Canadian weeds. 45. Solidago canadensis L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 60:1393–1409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar