Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-5lx2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T11:27:30.365Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Variation in Response of Four Nightshades (Solanum spp.) to Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Alex G. Ogg Jr.*
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., 215 Johnson Hall, Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164-6421

Abstract

In field experiments at Prosser, WA, black nightshade (Solanum nigrum L. # SOLNI), eastern black nightshade (S. ptycanthum Dun. # SOLPT), American black nightshade (S. americanum Mill. # SOLAM), hairy nightshade (S. sarrachoides Sendtner # SOLSA), and sometimes accessions within a species responded differentially to herbicides applied preplant incorporated, preemergence, or postemergence. Also, the response of the nightshades to some of the herbicides varied significantly between years. Generally, black nightshade was more tolerant of herbicides than were the other three species. An accession of black nightshade from England and an accession of eastern black nightshade from Minnesota were the most tolerant of herbicides of eight accessions evaluated. Of the 25 herbicides evaluated, preplant-incorporated applications of ethalfluralin [N-ethyl-N-(2-methyl-2-propenyl)-2,6-dinitro-4-(trifluoromethyl) benzenamine] and preemergence applications of alachlor [2-chloro-N-(2,6-diethylphenyl)-N-(methoxymethyl)acetamide], chloramben (3-amino-2,5-dichlorobenzoic acid), lactofen [1′-(carboethoxy)ethyl 5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl) phenoxy]-2-nitrobenzoate], and metolachlor [2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl] acetamide] controlled all species best. These herbicides reduced the oven-dry weights of both accessions of all four species of nightshades by 93% or more. Nightshades varied widely in their response to the thiocarbamates.

Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literatur Cited

1. Keeley, P. E. and Thullen, R. J. 1983. Influence of planting date on the growth of black nightshade (Solanum nigrum). Weed Sci. 31:180184.Google Scholar
2. Ogg, A. G. Jr. and Dawson, J. H. 1984. Time of emergence of eight weed species. Weed Sci. 32:327335.Google Scholar
3. Ogg, A. G. Jr. and Martin, M. W. 1979. Effects of herbicides on weed control and growth and yields of direct-seeded tomatoes. Washington State Univ. Coll. of Agric. Res. Ctr. Bull. 870. 5 pp.Google Scholar
4. Ogg, A. G. Jr., Rogers, B. S., and Schilling, E. E. 1981. Characterization of black nightshade (Solanum nigrum) and related species in the United States. Weed Sci. 29:2732.Google Scholar
5. Quackenbush, L. S. and Andersen, R. N. 1984. Distribution and biology of two nightshades (Solanum spp.) in Minnesota. Weed Sci. 32:529533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Quackenbush, L. S. and Andersen, R. N. 1985. Susceptibility of five species of the Solanum nigrum complex to herbicides. Weed Sci. 33:386390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Roberts, H. A. and Boddrell, J. E. 1983. Field emergence and temperature requirements for germination in Solanum sarrachoides Sendt. Weed Res. 23:247252.Google Scholar
8. Roberts, H. A. and Lockett, P. M. 1978. Seed dormancy and field emergence in Solanum nigrum L. Weed Res. 18:231241.Google Scholar
9. Schilling, E. E. 1981. Systematics of Solanum section Solanum (Solanaceae) in North America. Syst. Bot. 6:172185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Vandeventer, J. W., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1982. Morphological and physiological variability in black nightshade (Solanum spp.). Pestic. Sci. 13:257262.Google Scholar
11. Wilson, R. G. 1984. Accelerated degradation of thiocarbamate herbicides in soil with prior thiocarbamate herbicide exposure. Weed Sci. 32:264268.Google Scholar