Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-10T03:00:42.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Day and Night Temperature on Vegetative Growth of Texas Panicum (Panicum texanum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David T. Patterson
David T. Patterson*
Affiliation:
Plant Physiol., U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., Dep. Bot., Duke Univ., Durham, NC 27706
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Texas panicum was grown in controlled-environment chambers in 16 day/night temperature regimes ranging from 19/11 to 34/26 C. After 33 days, maximum plant height, leaf area, and dry weight occurred at 34/26 C. The greatest number of tillers and leaves occurred at 34/16 C. Partitioning of plant biomass into stems increased with increasing night temperature, while partitioning into leaves tended to decrease. Partitioning of biomass into roots decreased with increasing night temperature at day temperatures of 19 or 24 C but not at 34 C. Plant dry matter production (DMP) was highly correlated with both leaf area duration (LAD) and net assimilation rate (NAR) during the first 2 weeks of growth. During the subsequent 3 weeks, DMP was highly correlated with LAD but not with NAR. The low-temperature threshold for growth of Texas panicum was approximately 11 C. Texas panicum attained 25% of its maximum growth at an average daily temperature of 21 C, 50% at 24 C, and 75% at 26 C. Texas panicum is unlikely to become a highly competitive weed outside the southern and southwestern United States.

Keywords

Texas panicumPanicum texanum Buckl. # PANTEGrowth analysisecological rangebiomass partitioningPANTE
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 38 , Issue 4-5 , September 1990 , pp. 365 - 373
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1971. Climatography of the United States. No. 84. Daily normals of temperature and heating and cooling degree days 1941–1970. U.S. Dep. Comm. Nat Oceanic and Atmos. Admin., Environ. Data Serv., Nat Climatic Ctr., Asheville, NC. 602 pp.Google Scholar
2. Downs, R. J. and Hellmers, H. 1975. Environment and the Experimental Control of Plant Growth. Academic Press, New York. Page 112.Google Scholar
3. Elmore, C. D. 1984. Weed Survey–Southern States. Res. Rep. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 37:192–198.Google Scholar
4. Flint, E. P. and Patterson, D. T. 1983. Interference and temperature effects on growth in soybean (Glycine max) and associated C3 and C4 weeds. Weed Sci. 31:193–199.Google Scholar
5. Flint, E. P., Patterson, D. T., and Beyers, J. L. 1983. Interference and temperature effects on growth of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum), spurred anoda (Anoda cristata), and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 31:892–898.Google Scholar
6. Hattersley, P. W. 1983. The distribution of C3 and C4 grasses in Australia in relation to climate. Oecologia (Berl.) 57:113–128.Google Scholar
7. Hitchcock, A. S. 1960. Manual of the Grasses of the United States. U.S. Dep. Agric. Misc. Publ. No. 200. Pages 684–685.Google Scholar
8. Ivory, D. A. and Whiteman, P. C. 1978. Effect of temperature on growth of five subtropical grasses. I. Effect of day and night temperature on growth and morphological development Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 5:131–148.Google Scholar
9. Ivory, D. A. and Whiteman, P. C. 1978. Effect of temperature on growth of five subtropical grasses. II. Effect of low night temperature. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 5:149–157.Google Scholar
10. Kvet, J., Ondok, J. P., Necas, J., and Jarvis, P. G. 1971. Methods of growth analysis. Pages 343–391 in Sestak, Z., Catsky, J., and Jarvis, P. G., eds. Plant Photosynthetic Production. Manual of Methods. W. Junk, The Hague.Google Scholar
11. Larcher, W. 1975. Physiological Plant Ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York. Page 49.Google Scholar
12. Patterson, D. T. 1982. Effects of shading and temperature on showy crotalaria (Crotalaria spectabilis). Weed Sci. 30:692–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Patterson, D. T. and Flint, E. P. 1979. Effects of simulated field temperatures and chilling on itchgrass (Rottboellia exaltata), corn (Zea mays), and soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 27:645–650.Google Scholar
14. Patterson, D. T., Meyer, C. R., Flint, E. P., and Quimby, P. C. Jr. 1979. Temperature responses and potential distribution of itchgrass (Rottboellia exaltata) in the United States. Weed Sci. 27:77–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Patterson, D. T., Russell, A. E., Mortensen, D. A., Coffin, R. D., and Flint, E. P. 1986. Effects of temperature and photoperiod on Texas panicum (Panicum texanum) and wild proso millet (Panicum miliaceum). Weed Sci. 34:876–882.Google Scholar
16. Potvin, C. and Strain, B. R. 1985. Photosynthetic response to growth temperature and CO2 enrichment in two species of C4 grasses. Can. J. Bot. 63:483–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Potvin, C. and Strain, B. R. 1985. Effects of CO2 enrichment and temperature on growth in two C4 weeds, Echinochloa crus-galli and Eleusine indica . Can. J. Bot. 63:1495–1499.Google Scholar
18. Potvin, C., Strain, B. R., and Goeschl, J. D. 1985. Low night temperature effect on photosynthate translocation of two C4 grasses. Oecologia (Berl.) 67:305–309.Google Scholar
19. Silveus, W. A. 1933. Texas Grasses. The Clegg Co., San Antonio, TX. Page 564.Google Scholar
20. Sugiyama, T., Schmitt, M. R., Ku, S. B., and Edwards, G. E. 1979. Differences in cold lability of pyruvate, Pi dikinase among C4 species. Plant and Cell Physiol. 20:965–971.Google Scholar
21. Teeri, J. A. and Stowe, L. G. 1976. Climatic patterns and the distribution of C4 grasses in North America. Oecologia (Berl.) 23:1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Vasey, G. 1889. The agricultural grasses and forage plants of the United States. U.S. Dep. Agric. Spec. Bull. Pages 25–26.Google Scholar
23. Want, F. W. 1957. The experimental control of plant growth. Chron. Bot. 17. Page 238.Google Scholar