Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T17:19:10.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Herbicides Applied as Liquid Sprays and Granules for Weed Control in Cotton

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

E. L. Robinson ,
O. B. Wooten  and
J. R. Williford
E. L. Robinson
Affiliation:
Agricultural Engineering Research Division, Agr. Res. Serv., U.S. Department of Agriculture, Stoneville, Mississippi
O. B. Wooten
Affiliation:
Agricultural Engineering Research Division, Agr. Res. Serv., U.S. Department of Agriculture, Stoneville, Mississippi
J. R. Williford
Affiliation:
Agricultural Engineering Research Division, Agr. Res. Serv., U.S. Department of Agriculture, Stoneville, Mississippi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We evaluated the effectiveness of aqueous sprays and granules of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (diuron), 1,1-dimethyl-3-(α,α,α-trifluoro-m-tolyl)urea (fluometuron), isopropyl m-chlorocarbanilate (chlorpropham), α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-p-toluidine (trifluralin), and 2-chloro-2′, 6′-diethyl-N-(methoxymethyl) acetanilide (alachlor) incorporated shallow for weed control in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L., var. Stoneville 7A). In general, liquid formulation provided better weed control than did granular formulation. Applications of alachlor resulted in good weed control, but in a dry season the liquid spray form of the herbicide at high rates reduced the yield of cotton.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 18 , Issue 6 , November 1970 , pp. 751 - 753
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Barrentine, W. L., Wooten, O. B. and Williford, J. R. 1968. Evaluation studies of soil incorporators with dye tracer techniques. Mississippi Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. 54. 14 p.Google Scholar
2. Dana, M. N., Skroch, W. A., and Boone, D. M. 1965. Granular herbicides for cranberry bogs. Weeds 13:5–7.Google Scholar
3. Jordan, L. S., Lyons, J. M., Isom, W. H., and Day, B. E. 1968. Factors affecting performance of preemergence herbicides. Weed Sci. 16:457–462.Google Scholar
4. Klingman, G. C. 1961. Weed Control: As a Science. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York. 421 p.Google Scholar
5. Lyons, J. M. and Whiting, F. L. 1965. Incorporated preemergence granular herbicides on vegetable crops. Weeds 13:242–245.Google Scholar
6. McWhorter, C. G. and Wooten, O. B. 1961. The use of fluorescent tracers to study distribution of soil applied herbicides. Weeds 9:42–49.Google Scholar
7. Weldon, L. W. and Timmons, F. L. 1961. Photochemical degradation of diuron and monuron. Weeds 9:111–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Wooten, O. B., Ranney, C. D., and Fulgham, F. E. 1966. One-trip planting equipment for cotton. Mississippi Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 738. 10 p.Google Scholar