Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T06:06:46.325Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wild Oat (Avena fatua) Competition with Spring Wheat: Effects of Nitrogen Fertilization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Harry L. Carlson  and
James E. Hill
Harry L. Carlson
Affiliation:
Tulelake Field Stn., and Ext. Agron., Univ. California, Davis, CA 95616
James E. Hill
Affiliation:
Tulelake Field Stn., and Ext. Agron., Univ. California, Davis, CA 95616
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted to determine the effect of nitrogen fertilization on competition between wild oat (Avena fatua L. # AVEFA) and spring wheat (Triticum aestivum ‘Anza’). Nitrogen fertilizer treatments were applied over several wild oat-wheat density combinations. Wheat grain yield in wild oat-infested plots generally declined with fertilization while the density of wild oat panicles increased. Apparently, in competition with wheat, wild oat was better able to utilize the added nitrogen and thus gained a competitive advantage over the wheat. The increased competitiveness of wild oat resulted in reduced crop yields. Under the conditions of these experiments, nitrogen fertilization resulted in positive wheat yield response only when the wild oat plant density was below 1.6 percent of the total plant density.

Keywords

InterferenceTriticum aestivumAVEFA
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , January 1986 , pp. 29 - 33
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Alkamper, J. 1976. Influence of weed infestation on effect of fertilizer dressings. Pflanzenschutz-Nachrichten 29:191–235.Google Scholar
2. Appleby, A. P., Olson, P. D., and Colbert, D. R. 1976. Winter wheat yield reduction from interference by Italian ryegrass. Agron. J. 68:463–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Carlson, H. L. and Hill, J. E. 1985. Wild oat (Avena fatua) competition with spring wheat: plant density effects. Weed Sci. 33:176–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Henson, J. F. and Jordan, L. S. 1982. Wild oat (Avena fatua) competition with wheat (Triticum aestivum and T. turgidum durum) for nitrate. Weed Sci. 30:297–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Little, T. M. and Hills, F. J. 1978. Mean separation. Pages 61–76 in Agricultural Experimentation-Design and Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
6. McCurdy, E. V. 1958. The effect of crop competition on the number of wild oats in the crop. Res. Rep. West Sect. Nat. Weed Comm. Can. Page 34.Google Scholar
7. Sexsmith, J. J. 1955. Delayed seeding of wheat and barley for control of wild oats. Res. Rep. 12th N. Cent. Weed Cont. Conf. Can. Pages 80–82.Google Scholar
8. Sexsmith, J. J. and Russell, G. C. 1962. Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on wild oats in spring wheat. Can. J. Plant Sci. 43:64–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Sexsmith, J. J. and Pittman, U. L. 1963. Effect of nitrogen fertilization on germination and stand of wild oats. Weeds 11:99–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Thurston, J. M. 1959. A comparative study of the growth of wild oats and cultivated cereals with varied nitrogen supply. Annu. Appl. Bio. 47:716–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Thurston, J. M. 1962. Effect of competition from cereal crops on the germination and growth of Avena fatua L. in a naturally infested field. Weed Res. 2:192–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Watkins, F. B. 1971. Effects of annual dressings of nitrogen fertilizer on wild oat infestations. Weed Res. 11:299–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar