Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-21T19:19:39.145Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Air-Assist, Air-Foil, and Air-Curtain Sprayers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Loren E. Bode*
Affiliation:
Dep. Agric. Eng., Univ. Ill., Urbana, IL 61801

Abstract

Air-assist nozzles that use pneumatic energy to help atomize the spray liquid were reviewed. These nozzles use larger orifices than conventional hydraulic nozzles for low-volume applications. By changing the air pressure, various droplet sizes can be produced without changing nozzle tips. Several systems use air to transport the atomized spray to specific target sites. Various air volumes and velocities have been evaluated in these systems. Preliminary research indicated that air can improve canopy penetration and can cover the entire plant more uniformly. Undersides of leaves can be treated easier with air-assist systems compared to conventional applications with hydraulic nozzles.

Type
Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1984. Sprayfoil Model PT 4583 field sprayer. Evaluation Report 350. Prairie Agric. Machinery Inst., Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.Google Scholar
2. Anonymous. 1986. Air spray for complete control. Power Farming 65(2):3237.Google Scholar
3. Gardisser, D., and Baldwin, F. 1987. Comparison of herbicide application equipment. Proc. 39th Ill. Pest Control Conf., Univ. Ill., Urbana. p. 7177.Google Scholar
4. Grafius, E., and Van Ee, G. R. 1986. Application technology for control of European corn borer in vegetables for processing. Preliminary Research Report, Agric. Eng. Dep., Mich. State Univ., E. Lansing.Google Scholar
5. Lueschen, W. E., and Hoverstad, T. R. 1986. A comparison between flat fan and air-assist nozzles for weed control in soybeans. Minn. Agric. Exp. Stn. Paper No. 2081, Misc. J. Series, Univ. Minn., St. Paul.Google Scholar
6. Marking, Syl. 1986. Make your own high tech sprayer. Soybean Dig. 47(1):326.Google Scholar
7. McWhorter, C. G., Fulgham, F. E., and Barrentine, W. L. 1987. An air-assist spray nozzle for applying herbicides in ultra-low volume. Paper submitted for publication. U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Ser., Stoneville, MS 38776.Google Scholar
8. Mowitz, Dave. 1987. Air-assist application: Next revolution in spraying. Success. Farming 85(1):26.Google Scholar
9. Reed, T. F. 1985. Advances in spray nozzle designs for chemical application. Machinery Conf., Spraying Systems Company, Wheaton, IL. p. 24.Google Scholar
10. Roehl, L. J. 1982. Row crop sprayer evaluation. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. Paper No. 82-1107. St. Joseph, MI.Google Scholar
11. Russnogle, John. 1986. Air sprayer covers crops with curtain of chemical. Farm J. 110(1):24–J.Google Scholar
12. Staniland, L. N. 1960. Field tests of spraying equipment by means of fluorescent tracer techniques. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 5(1):4282.Google Scholar
13. Van Ee, G. R., Ledebuhr, R. L., and Potter, H. S. 1985. Performance evaluation of the air-curtain sprayer. Paper submitted for publication. Agric. Eng. Dep., Mich. State Univ., E. Lansing.Google Scholar
14. Van Ee, G. R., Ledebuhr, R. L., and Potter, H. S. 1985. Sprayer trials for the control of white mold of cranberry beans. Paper submitted for publication. Agric. Eng. Dep., Mich. State Univ., E. Lansing.Google Scholar
15. Watson, D. G. 1984. The construction and evaluation of two air stream assisted, hydraulic nozzle spraying units. M.S. thesis, South. Ill. Univ., Carbondale.Google Scholar
16. Watson, D. G., and Wolff, R. L. 1985. Air carrier technique for row crop spraying. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 28(5):14451448.Google Scholar
17. Wolff, R. L., and Watson, D. G. 1986. Development of an air-assisted row crop sprayer. ASAE/SAE Paper 86–1463. Agric. Machinery Conf., Cedar Rapids, IA, Nov. 3–5. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng., St. Joseph, MI.Google Scholar
18. Zucker, A., and Zamir, N. 1964. Air carrier sprayers for cotton. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 9(2):188193.Google Scholar