Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T23:34:35.213Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biological Mulches for Managing Weeds in Transplanted Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Frank Forcella ,
Steven R. Poppe ,
Neil C. Hansen ,
William A. Head ,
Emily Hoover ,
Faye Propsom  and
Jill Mckensie
Frank Forcella*
Affiliation:
North Central Soil Conservation Research Laboratory, USDA-ARS, 803 Iowa Avenue, Morris, MN 56267
Steven R. Poppe
Affiliation:
West Central Research and Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, Morris, MN 56267
Neil C. Hansen
Affiliation:
West Central Research and Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, Morris, MN 56267
William A. Head
Affiliation:
West Central Research and Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, Morris, MN 56267
Emily Hoover
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
Faye Propsom
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
Jill Mckensie
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: forcella@morris.ars.usda.gov
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Diminishing availability and increasing costs of herbicides cause strawberry growers to seek both chemical and nonchemical alternatives, especially for within-row weed control soon after strawberries are transplanted. Several weed control treatments for strawberry establishment were examined during 2 yr in Minnesota. Treatments included: woolen landscaping fabric centered over the crop row; as above, but 2-ply fabric; spring canola incorporated into soil when 30 cm tall; as above, but canola killed with burndown herbicide and left as mulch; standard herbicide, DCPA; hand weeded; and no weed control. Areas between all strawberry rows were cultivated. Measurements included weed densities and weights, numbers of strawberry daughter plants, and fruit yield 1 yr after transplantation. The best alternative treatment was the 1-ply woolen fabric. It nearly eliminated weeds from rows, promoted daughter plant rooting, and allowed maximum fruit yields, equivalent to those of the DCPA and hand-weeded treatments. Canola mulch controlled weeds inconsistently and achieved only modest to low production of daughter plants and fruit. Weed control and fruit yield with incorporated canola were similar to the weedy check treatment.

Keywords

DCPAcanola, Brassica napus L.strawberry, Fragaria × ananassa Duchesne ‘Glooscap’Cover croplandscape fabricweed controlweed management
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , December 2003 , pp. 782 - 787
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 1996. Statistix for Windows. Tallahassee, FL: Analytical Software. 134 p.Google Scholar
Baron, J. 2001. IR-4 New Products/Transitional Solution List — August 2001:. Web page: http://www.fluoridealert.org/pesticides/New.fluorinated.pesticides.pdf.Google Scholar
Bish, E. B., Cantliffe, D. J., and Chandler, C. K. 2002. Temperature conditioning and container size affect fruit yield of strawberry plug plants in a winter, annual hill production system. HortScience 37:762–764.Google Scholar
Boydston, R. A. and Huang, A. 1995. Rapeseed (Brassica napus) green manure crop suppresses weeds in potato (Solanum tuberosum). Weed Technol. 9:669–675.Google Scholar
Darnell, R. L., Cantliffe, D. J., Kirschbaum, D. S., and Chandler, C. K. 2003. The physiology of flowering in strawberry. Hortic. Rev 28:325–349.Google Scholar
Eberlein, C. V., Morra, M. J., Guttieri, M. J., Brown, P. D., and Brown, J. 1998. Glucosinolate production in five field grown Brassica napus cultivars used as green manures. Weed Technol. 12:712–718.Google Scholar
Fujime, Y. and Yamasaki, N. 1988. Effects of pretreatment, day length, and temperature on induction and breaking of dormancy in strawberry plants. J. Japan. Soc. Hort. Sci 56:444–451.Google Scholar
Gardiner, J. B., Mora, M. J., Eberlein, C. V., Brown, P. D., and Borek, V. 1999. Allelochemicals released in soil following incorporation of rapeseed (Brassica napus) green manures. J. Agric. Food Chem. 47:3837–3842.Google Scholar
Hartz, T. K., Devay, J. E., and Elmore, C. L. 1993. Solarization is an effective soil disinfestation technique for strawberry production. HortScience 28:104–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasperbauer, M. J. 2000. Strawberry yield over red versus black plastic mulch. Crop Sci 40:171–174.Google Scholar
Poling, E. B. 1994. Strawberry plasticulture in North Carolina. II. Preplant, planting, and postplant considerations fro growing ‘Chandler’ strawberry on black plastic mulch. J. Small Fruit Viticult 2:53–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. F., Bendixen, W. E., and Fennimore, S. A. 2001. UC Pest Management Guidelines: Strawberry Herbicide Treatment Table. UC ANR Publication 3468, University of California at Davis: Web page: http://www.ipm.ucdavis.edu/PMG/r734700211.html.Google Scholar
Starke, K. D., Monks, D. W., and Mills, R. J. 1999. Evaluation of new herbicides in newly planted strawberry. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 52:81–82.Google Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. New York: McGraw Hill. 471 p.Google Scholar
Whitworth, J. L. 1995. The ability of some cover crops to suppress weeds of strawberry fields. J. Sust. Agric 7:137–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zandstra, B. H., Binning, L. K., and Fritz, V. et al. 1995. Weed Control Guide for Vegetable Crops. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University N.C. Reg. Publ. 330. 31 p.Google Scholar