Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-22T11:11:52.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Canada Thistle (Cirsium arvense) Control with Hexazinone in Crown Vetch (Coronilla varia)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Philip W. Tipping
Philip W. Tipping*
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS Invasive Plant Research Laboratory, 3205 College Avenue, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33314
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Spot treatments with hexazinone (0.03, 0.046, and 0.06% ai [v/v]) were evaluated for their effects on thistle density, seed production, and crown vetch vigor from 1991 to 1994 to determine if long-term usage of hexazinone caused damage to the vetch and exacerbated the thistle problem. Thistle densities were reduced within a year at any concentration of hexazinone and seed production was reduced or eliminated. Environment had a large impact because initial thistle densities varied widely among years. The amount of precipitation during July of the previous year accounted for 89% of the variation in initial thistle densities in the subsequent year. Vetch injury from hexazinone was also best explained by the amount of precipitation during July. Vigorously growing crown vetch in wet years may have suppressed the thistles enough to reduce density the following year while drought years reduced the competitiveness of the crown vetch, resulting in higher initial densities of thistles in the following year.

Keywords

HexazinoneCanada thistle, Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. # CIRARcrown vetch, Coronilla varia L.Herbicide selectivityinterspecific plant competitionweather effectsPPFDphotosynthetic photon flux density
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , September 2001 , pp. 559 - 563
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ang, B. N., Kok, L. T., Holtzman, G. I., and Wolf, D. D. 1994. Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) response to simulated insect defoliation and plant competition. Weed Sci. 42: 403–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous. 1984. U.S. Department of Agriculture (U.S. Forest Service). Pesticide Background Statements. Volume I. Herbicides. Washington, D.C. pp. 8–32.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1994. Herbicide Handbook. 7 ed. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. pp. 156–158.Google Scholar
Detmers, F. 1927. Canada thistle, Cirsium arvense Tourn. Field thistle, creeping thistle. Ohio Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 414. 45 p.Google Scholar
Hallgren, E. 1976. Development and competition in stands of barley plants and weeds. 2. Influence of row spacing. Swed. J. Agric. Res. 6: 255–261.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. M. 1958. Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense Scop.) control with cultivation, cropping, and chemical sprays. Weeds 6: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, J. J., Hsiao, A. I., and McIntryre, G. I. 1985. Some effects of humidity on the growth and development of Cirsium arvense . Bot. Gaz. 146: 483–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, D. G. and Myall, A. J. 1976. Sexual dimorphism in Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. Ann. Bot. 40: 115–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, R. J. 1975. The biology of Canadian weeds: 13. Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. Can. J. Plant Sci. 55: 1033–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadeau, L. B. and Vanden Born, W. H. 1989. The root system of Canada thistle. Can. J. Plant Sci. 69: 1199–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute. 1985. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. SAS Institute, Cary, N.C. Google Scholar
Tworkoski, T. 1992. Development and environmental effects on assimilate partitioning in Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Sci. 40: 79–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar