Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-01T10:39:11.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dalmatian Toadflax (Linaria dalmatica): New Host for Cucumber Mosaic Virus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Courtney L. Pariera Dinkins*
Affiliation:
Department of Land Resources & Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717
Sue K. Brumfield
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717
Robert K. D. Peterson
Affiliation:
Department of Land Resources & Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717
William E. Grey
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717
Sharlene E. Sing
Affiliation:
Department of Land Resources & Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: mortney17@hotmail.com

Abstract

To date, there have been no reports of Dalmatian toadflax serving as a host for cucumber mosaic virus (CMV). Infestations of Dalmatian toadflax may serve as a reservoir of CMV, thereby facilitating aphid transmission of CMV to both agricultural crops and native plants. The goal of this study was to determine whether Dalmatian toadflax is a host for CMV. Dalmatian toadflax seedlings were randomly assigned to two treatments (18 replicates/treatment): no inoculation (control) and inoculation with CMV (Fast New York strain). The Dalmatian toadflax seedlings were inoculated by standard mechanical methods and tested for the presence of CMV using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Ten of the 18 CMV-inoculated toadflax plants tested positive for the virus; 6 of the 18 displayed systemic mosaic chlorosis and leaf curling. All control plants tested negative. Transmission electron microscopy obtained from CMV-positive plants confirmed the presence of CMV based on physical properties. To verify CMV infestation, tobacco plants were assigned to the following treatments (six replicates/treatment): no inoculation (control), CMV-negative (control) inoculation, and a CMV-positive inoculation. Plants were inoculated by standard methods. Five of the 6 tobacco plants treated with the CMV-positive inoculum tested positive for CMV using ELISA. All control plants tested negative for the virus.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Francki, R. I. B., Mossop, D. W., and Hatta, T. 1979. Cucumber mosaic virus. CMI/AAB Descriptions of Plant Viruses, No.213. Kew, Surrey, UK Commonwealth Mycological Institute and Association of Applied Biologists.Google Scholar
[NRC] National Research Council 1983. Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process. Washington, DC National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Rist, D. L. and Lorbeer, J. W. 1989. Occurrence and overwintering of cucumber mosaic virus and broad bean wilt virus in weeds growing near commercial lettuce fields in New York. Phytopathology 79:6569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
University of Montana 2001. INVADERS Online Database System. Division of Biological Sciences. http://invader.dbs.umt.edu. Accessed: March 22, 2006.Google Scholar
[USOSTP] U.S. Office of Science Technology and Policy 1999. Ecological Risk Assessment in the Federal Government. Washington, DC Committee on Environment and Natural Resources of the National Science and Technology Council CENR/5-99/001. 219.Google Scholar
Vujnovic, K. and Wein, R. W. 1997. The biology of Canadian weeds. 106. Linaria dalmatica (L.) Mill. Can. J. Plant. Sci. 77:483491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar