Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-02T15:13:27.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Differential Varietal Response of Green Pea (Pisum sativum) to Metribuzin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Kassim Al-Khatib ,
Carl Libbey ,
Sorkel Kadir  and
Rick Boydston
Kassim Al-Khatib
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506
Carl Libbey
Affiliation:
N.W. Research Extension Center, Washington State University, Mount Vernon, WA 98273
Sorkel Kadir
Affiliation:
N.W. Research Extension Center, Washington State University, Mount Vernon, WA 98273
Rick Boydston
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Prosser, WA 99350
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field and greenhouse experiments evaluated the differential response of 15 green pea varieties to metribuzin applied preemergence. ‘Charo,’ ‘CMG 298,’ ‘Leah,’ ‘Scout,’ and ‘Puget’ were the most tolerant, whereas ‘Bolero’ and ‘Sundance’ were the most susceptible varieties under greenhouse conditions. Variable chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv), efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fmax), and leaf area were reduced sharply by metribuzin in susceptible varieties, and metribuzin susceptibility correlated highly with the reduction in shoot dry weight. Green pea varieties grown under field conditions responded to metribuzin similarly to pea varieties grown under greenhouse conditions. Metribuzin reduced shoot dry weight more in peas grown at 30/25 C than in those grown at 25/20 and 20/15 C. Also, metribuzin injured peas more when grown in soil saturated to field capacity compared to soil at 70 and 40% of field capacity.

Keywords

Metribuzin, 4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-onegreen pea, Pisum sativum L.Chlorophyll fluorescencecrop toleranceherbicide phytotoxicitysoil moisturetemperatureDAP, days after plantingF0 initial fluorescenceFmax, maximum fluorescenceFv, variable fluorescencePOST, postemergencePRE, preemergence
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , December 1997 , pp. 775 - 781
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Al-Khatib, K. and Paulsen, G. M. 1990. Photosynthesis and productivity during high temperature stress of wheat genotypes from major world regions. Crop Sci. 30:1127–1132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armond, P. A., Schreiber, U., and Björkman, O. 1978. Photosynthetic acclimation to temperature in the desert shrub, Larrea divaricata. II. Light-harvesting efficiency and electron transport. Plant Physiol. 61:411–415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berry, J. and Björkman, O. 1980. Photosynthetic response and adaptation to temperature in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 31:491–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, R. R. and Luxmoore, R. J. 1986. Water retention: field methods. In Lute, A., ed. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy. pp. 663–683.Google Scholar
Buman, R. A., Gealy, D. R., and Ogg, A. G. Jr. 1992. Effect of temperature on root absorption of metribuzin and its ethylthio analog by winter wheat (Triticum aestivum), jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica), and downy brome (Bromus tectorum). Weed Sci. 40:517–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frear, D. S., Mansager, E. R., Swanson, E. R., and Tanaka, F. S. 1983. Metribuzin metabolism in tomato: isolation and identification of N-glucoside conjugates. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 19:270–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gawronski, S. W., Haderlie, L. C., Callihan, R. H., and Gawronska, H. 1986a. Mechanism of metribuzin tolerance: herbicide metabolism as a basis for tolerance in potatoes. Weed Res. 26:307–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gawronski, S. W., Haderlie, L. C., and Stark, J. C. 1986b. Metribuzin absorption and translocation in two barley cultivars. Weed Sci. 34:491–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gawronski, S. W., Haderlie, L. C., and Stark, J. C. 1987. Metribuzin metabolism as the basis for tolerance in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Weed Res. 27:49–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graf, G. T. and Ogg, A. G. Jr. 1976. Differential responses of potato cultivars to metribuzin. Weed Sci. 34:137–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardcastle, W. S. 1974. Differences in the tolerance of metribuzin by varieties of soybeans. Weed Res. 14:181–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, S. W., Libbey, C. R., and Hall, E. R. 1989. Green pea herbicide evaluation. In 1989 Weed Science Report. Pullman, WA: Washington Stale University, pp. 43–47.Google Scholar
Krause, G. H. and Weis, E. 1984. Chlorophyll fluorescence as a tool in plant physiology: II. Interpretation of fluorescence signals. Photosynth. Res. 5:139–157.Google ScholarPubMed
Mangeot, B. L., Slife, F. E., and Rieck, C. E. 1979. Differential metabolism of metribuzin by two soybean (Glycine max) cultivars. Weed Sci. 27:267–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melcarek, P. K. and Brown, G. N. 1977. The effects of chilling stress on the chlorophyll fluorescence of leaves. Plant Cell Physiol. 18:1099–1107.Google Scholar
Mets, L. and Thiol, A. 1989. Biochemistry and genetic control of the photosystem II herbicide target site. In Böger, P. and Sandmann, G., eds. Target Sites of Herbicide Action. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Motsenbocker, C. E. and Monaco, T. J. 1993. Differential tolerance of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) clones to metribuzin. Weed Technol. 7:349–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyer, J. R. 1987. Effect of soil moisture on the efficacy and selectivity of soil-applied herbicides. Rev. Weed Sci. 3:19–34.Google Scholar
Mukohata, Y., Yagi, T., and Higashida, M. 1973. Biophysical studies on sub-cellular particles. VI. Photosynthetic activities in isolated spinach chloroplasts after transient warming. Plant Cell Physiol. 14:111–118.Google Scholar
Santarius, K. A. 1975. Sites of heat sensitivity in chloroplasts and differential inactivation of cyclic and noncyclic photophosphorylation by heating. J. Therm. Biol. 1:101–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreiber, V., Vidaver, W., Runeckles, V. C., and Rosen, P. 1978. Chlorophyll fluorescence assay for ozone injury in intact plants. Plant Physiol. 61:80–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schroeder, J., Banks, P. A., and Nicholes, R. L. 1985. Soft red winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivar response to metribuzin. Weed Sci. 34:66–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, D. R., Peeper, T. F., and Nofziger, D. L. 1985. Comparison of chlorophyll fluorescence and fresh weight as herbicide bioassay techniques, Weed Sci. 33:29–33.Google Scholar
Shaw, D. R., Peeper, T. F., and Nofziger, D. L. 1986. Evaluation of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters for an intact-plant herbicide bioassay. Crop Sci. 26:756–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smillie, R. M. and Nott, R. 1982. Salt tolerance in crop plants monitored by chlorophyll fluorescence in vivo . Plant Physiol. 70:1049–1054.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, A. E., Phatak, S. C., and Emmatty, D. A. 1989. Metribuzin metabolism by tomato cultivars with low. medium, and high levels of tolerance to metribuzin. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 35:284–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. E. and Wilkinson, R. E. 1974. Differential absorption, translocation and metabolism of metribuzin by soybean cultivars. Physiol. Plant. 30:253–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, G. R., McLeod, J. E., and Phatak, S. C. 1976. Differential tolerance of tomato cultivars to metribuzin. Weed Sci. 25:382–385.Google Scholar
Upchurch, R. P. 1958. The influence of soil factors on the phytotoxicity and plant selectivity of diuron. Weeds 6:161–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar