Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:46:21.755Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Early Season Mowing Improves the Effectiveness of Chlorsulfuron and Glyphosate for Control of Perennial Pepperweed (Lepidium latifolium)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Mark J. Renz*
Affiliation:
New Mexico State University, Department of Extension Plant Sciences, P.O. Box 30003 MSC 3AE, Las Cruces, NM 88003
Joseph M. Ditomaso
Affiliation:
Weed Science Program, Department of Vegetable Crops University of California, Davis, CA 95616
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: markrenz@nmsu.edu

Abstract

Perennial pepperweed is an invasive weed spreading rapidly throughout a wide range of habitats in the western United States. This study was designed to test whether integrating early season mowing with a systemic herbicide application would improve the control of perennial pepperweed. Experiments were conducted within three different environments including high desert, roadside, and floodplain areas. In treatments not mowed, chlorsulfuron at 0.104 kg ai/ha reduced perennial pepperweed biomass and density by 100%, whereas applications of 2,4-D at 2.11 kg ae/ha and glyphosate at 3.33 kg ae/ha were inconsistent and did not provide effective control. Mowing alone did not reduce perennial pepperweed biomass or density the following year, but mowing followed by application of a herbicide treatment to resprouting plants reduced biomass at all three sites compared with nonmowed treatments including herbicides. Among combinations of mowing and herbicides, chlorsulfuron at 0.052 kg/ha reduced perennial pepperweed biomass by >99% at all three sites, and glyphosate at 3.33 kg/ha reduced biomass by ≥80% at two sites 1 yr after applications. The effectiveness of glyphosate at 3.33 kg/ha in combination with mowing provides land managers with a valuable control option for perennial pepperweed in wetland or riparian areas where chlorsulfuron is not registered for use.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Beck, K. G. and Sebastian, J. R. 2000. Combining mowing and fall-applied herbicides to control Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Technol. 14:351356.Google Scholar
Blank, R. R. and Young, J. A. 1997. Lepidium latifolium: influences on soil properties, rates of spread, and competitive stature. in Brock, J. H., Wade, M., Pysek, P., and Green, D., eds., Plant Invasions: Studies from North America and Europe. Leiden, The Netherlands: Backhuys Publishers. Pp. 6980.Google Scholar
Hunter, J. H. 1995. Effect of bud vs. rosette growth stage on translocation of 14C-glyphosate in Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Sci. 43:347351.Google Scholar
Hunter, J. H. 1996. Control of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) with glyphosate applied at the bud vs. rosette stage. Weed Sci. 44:934938.Google Scholar
Mislevy, P., Mullahey, J. J., and Martin, F. G. 1999. Preherbicide mowing and herbicide rate on tropical soda apple (Solanum viarum) control. Weed Technol. 13:172175.Google Scholar
Monteiro, A., Moreira, I., and Sousa, E. 1999. Effect of prior common reed (Phragmites australis) cutting on herbicide efficacy. Hydrobiologia 415:305308.Google Scholar
Trumbo, J. 1994. Perennial pepperweed: a threat to wildland areas. CalEPPC Newsletter 2:45.Google Scholar
Young, J. A., Clements, C. D., and Blank, R. R. 2002. Herbicide residues and perennial grass on establishment perennial pepperweed sites. J. Range Manag. 55:194196.Google Scholar
Young, J. A., Palmquist, D. E., and Blank, R. R. 1998. The ecology and control of perennial pepperweed (Lepidium latifolium L). Weed Technol. 12:402405.Google Scholar
Young, J. A., Palmquist, D. E., and Wotring, S. O. 1997. The invasive nature of Lepidium latifolium: a review. in Brock, J. H., Wade, M., Pysek, P., and Green, D., eds. Plant Invasions: Studies from North America and Europe. Leiden, The Netherlands: Backhuys. Pp. 5968.Google Scholar