Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T09:38:42.212Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Safener CGA-154281 on Metolachlor/Atrazine Injury to Corn (Zea mays)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Chester L. Foy
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol., Physiol., Weed Sci., Va. Polytech. Inst. State Univ., Blacksburg, VA 24061
Harold L. Witt
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol., Physiol., Weed Sci., Va. Polytech. Inst. State Univ., Blacksburg, VA 24061

Abstract

Three seed lots each of two varieties of field corn were compared in greenhouse and field studies. Cold test germination percentages of the seed lots were as follows: 79, 85, and 93% for ‘DK656’; 77, 84, and 91% for ‘T1100’. Tank mixes of metolachlor or metolachlor with safener CGA-154281 plus atrazine or formulated metolachlor/atrazine with and without the safener were applied preemergence. Crop stand of either variety or among seed lots within a variety was not affected by herbicide treatments. In the greenhouse, fewer corn plants were injured and growth of plants was greater with herbicides with safener than herbicides without safener. Plant heights and weights at harvest from the most vigorous seed lot of DK656 were higher than those of the other two seed lots. Herbicide treatments with the safener did not cause significant injury to corn in the field. Yields of both varieties increased with herbicide treatments in one conventional planting. No significant differences in injury or yields occurred among seed lots within varieties.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1988. CGA-154281 Herbicide Safener. Technical Release. Ciba-Geigy Corporation, Greensboro, NC 27409.Google Scholar
2. Bennett, M. A., and Gorski, S. F. 1989. Response of sweet corn (Zea mays) endosperm mutants to chloracetamide and thiocarbamate herbicides. Weed Technol. 3:475478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Boldt, L. D., and Barrett, M. 1989. Factors in alachlor and metolachlor injury to corn (Zea mays) seedlings. Weed Technol. 3:303306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Dixon, G. A., and Stoller, E. W. 1982. Differential toxicity, absorption, translocation and metabolism of metolachlor in corn (Zea mays) and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus). Weed Sci. 30:225230.Google Scholar
5. Hale, M. G., and Orcutt, D. M. 1987. The Physiology of Plants under Stress. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 206 p.Google Scholar
6. Hatzios, K. K., and Hoagland, R. E. 1989. Herbicide safeners: Progress and prospects. p. 355365 in Hatzios, K. K. and Hoagland, R. E., ed. Crop Safeners for Herbicides, Academic Press, Inc. New York.Google Scholar
7. Hatzios, K. K. 1983. Herbicide antidotes: Development, chemistry, and mode of action. Adv. Agron. 36:265316.Google Scholar
8. Johnson, R. R., and Wax, L. M. 1981. Stand establishment and yield of corn as affected by herbicides and seed vigor. Agron. J. 73:859863.Google Scholar
9. Leavitt, J.R.C., and Penner, D. 1978. Protection of corn (Zea mays) from acetanilide herbicidal injury with the antidote R-25788. Weed Sci. 26:653659.Google Scholar
10. Mersie, W., Mebrahtu, T., and Rangappa, M. 1989. Ozone-metolachlor interactions on corn (Zea mays), bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), and soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 3:650653.Google Scholar
11. Pillai, P., Davis, D. E., and Truelove, B. 1979. Effects of metolachlor on germination, growth, leucine uptake, and protein synthesis. Weed Sci. 27:634637.Google Scholar
12. Winkle, M. E., Leavitt, J.R.C., and Burnside, O. C. 1980. Acetanilideantidote combinations for weed control in corn (Zea mays) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Weed Sci. 28:699704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar