Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-04T18:18:15.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Efficacy of PRE and POST Herbicides for Control of Citron Melon (Citrullus lanatus var. citroides)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Analiza Henedina M. Ramirez ,
Amit J. Jhala  and
Megh Singh
Analiza Henedina M. Ramirez*
Affiliation:
Citrus Research and Education Center, IFAS-University of Florida, 700 Experimental Station Road, Lake Alfred, FL 33850-2299
Amit J. Jhala
Affiliation:
Citrus Research and Education Center, IFAS-University of Florida, 700 Experimental Station Road, Lake Alfred, FL 33850-2299
Megh Singh
Affiliation:
Citrus Research and Education Center, IFAS-University of Florida, 700 Experimental Station Road, Lake Alfred, FL 33850-2299
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: ahmramirez@ufl.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Citron melon is a monoecious and hairy annual vine commonly found in citrus orchards and cotton and peanut fields. There is limited information available on citron melon control with PRE- and POST-applied herbicides in Florida citrus. Experiments were conducted to evaluate the response of citron melon to 11 PRE and 18 POST herbicides under greenhouse conditions. Indaziflam applied PRE at 0.095 kg ai ha−1 resulted in 13% citron melon emergence at 14 d after treatment (DAT). The majority of PRE herbicides did not affect emergence at 14 DAT. Efficacy of PRE herbicides at 21 DAT resulted in > 90% control of citron melon with bromacil, premix formulation of bromacil + diuron, flumioxazin, indaziflam at 0.073 and 0.095, norflurazon, and simazine. Citron melon control was < 30% 21 DAT following PRE-applied diuron, oryzalin, and flazasulfuron. Control of citron melon varied by POST herbicides and growth stage. Regardless of citron melon growth stage, glyphosate, glufosinate, saflufenacil, paraquat, and flumioxazin provided > 90% at 7 and 14 DAT. Carfentrazone, flazasulfuron, imazapic, pyrithiobac-Na, rimsulfuron, trifloxysulfuron, and premix of 2,4-D + glyphosate controlled citron melon at least 90% when applied to two- to four-leaf plants. Control was reduced when application was delayed to the six- to eight-leaf stage. Bentazon and halosulfuron controlled citron melon 11 to 31% regardless of growth stage. Biomass of citron melon at 14 DAT was reduced > 50% in all herbicide treatments except with bentazon and halosulfuron applied at both stages, and dicamba, mesotrione, imazapic, and rimsulfuron applied to six- to eight-leaf citron melon. The results of this study indicate that citron melon can be adequately controlled with several PRE- or POST-applied herbicides; however, research is required to evaluate PRE followed by POST programs or their tank mixtures for season-long control of citron melon under field conditions.

Citrullus lanatus var. citroides es una enredadera pilosa anual monoica que se encuentra en plantaciones de cítricos y campos de algodón y maní. Hay poca información disponible sobre el control de C. lanatus con herbicidas aplicados PRE y POST en plantaciones de cítricos en Florida. Se realizaron experimentos bajo condiciones de invernadero para evaluar la respuesta de esta maleza a 11 herbicidas PRE y 18 POST. Indaziflam aplicado PRE a 0.095 kg ai ha−1 resultó en 13% de emergencia de C. lanatus 14 días después del tratamiento (DAT). La mayoría de herbicidas PRE no afectaron la emergencia14 DAT. La eficacia de los herbicidas PRE 21 DAT resultó en >90% de control de C. lanatus con bromacil, una formulación pre-mezclada de bromacil + diuron, flumioxazin, indaziflam a 0.073 y 0.095, norflurazon, y simazine. El control de C. lanatus fue <30% 21 DAT después de aplicaciones PRE de diuron, oryzalin y flazasulfuron. El control de esta maleza varió dependiendo de los herbicidas POST y del estado de crecimiento. Independientemente del estado de crecimiento de C. lanatus, glyphosate, glufosinate, saflufenacil, paraquat y flumioxazin brindaron >90% a 7 y 14 DAT. Carfentrazone, flazasulfuron, imazapic, pyrithiobac-Na, rimsulfuron, trifloxysulfuron, y una pre-mezcla de 2,4-D + glyphosate controlaron C. lanatus al menos 90% cuando se aplicaron a plantas con dos a cuatro hojas. El control se redujo cuando la aplicación se atrasó hasta el estado de seis a ocho hojas. Bentazon y halosulfuron controlaron C. lanatus 11 a 31% sin importar el estado de crecimiento. La biomasa de C. lanatus a 14 DAT se redujo >50% en todos los tratamientos de herbicidas excepto con bentazon y halosulfuron aplicados en ambos estados, y dicamba, mezotrione, imazapic y rimsulfuron aplicados en el estado de seis a ocho hojas. Los resultados de este estudio indican que C. lanatus se puede controlar adecuadamente con varios herbicidas aplicados PRE y POST. Sin embargo, se necesita investigación para evaluar el control de C. lanatus a lo largo del ciclo de producción en condiciones de campo usando programas de aplicaciones PRE seguidas por aplicaciones POST o usando mezclas en tanque.

Keywords

Citron melon, Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Mats and Nakai var. citroides (L. H. Bailey) Mansf. CILACcitrus, Citrus sppcotton, Gossypium hirsutum L.peanut, Arachis hypogaea L.Biomasscitrusemergenceherbicide efficacy
Type
Weed Management—Other Crops/AREAS
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , December 2012 , pp. 783 - 788
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 2012. Alion™ Herbicide Label. Research Triangle Park, NC:Bayer CropScience. Pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
Bryson, C. T. and DeFelice, M. S., eds. 2009. Weeds of the South. Athens, GA:University of Georgia Press. Pp. 176.Google Scholar
Crowley, R. H., Teem, D. H., Buchanan, G. A., and Hovelend, C.S. 1979. Responses of Ipomoea spp. and Casia spp. to preemergence applied herbicides. Weed Sci. 27 :531–235.Google Scholar
Futch, S. 2006. Vines in Florida citrus. Horticultural Sciences Department. Florida Cooperative Extension Service. Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/hs318. Accessed: June 17, 2012.Google Scholar
Futch, S. and Singh, M. 2007. Weeds in Florida—new challenges and opportunities. Citrus Ind. 88 :15–17.Google Scholar
Futch, S. and Singh, M. 2011. 2011 Florida citrus pest management guide: Weeds. Pages 139–151 in 2011 Florida Citrus Pest Management Guide. Rogers, M. E., Dewdney, M. M., and Spann, T. M., eds. Florida Cooperative Extension Service (SP-43). Gainesville, FL:Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences-University of Florida.Google Scholar
Grichar, J. W., Besler, B. A., and Brewer, K. D. 2001. Citron melon (Citrullus lanatus var. citroides) control in Texas peanut (Arachis hypogaea) using postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 15 :481–484.Google Scholar
Grichar, J. W., Besler, B. A., and Brewer, K. D. 2002. Citron melon (Citrullus lanatus var. citroides) control in Texas peanut (Arachis hypogaea) using soil-applied herbicides. Weed Technol. 16 :528–531.Google Scholar
Hall, D. W., Vandiver, V. V., and Ferrell, J. A. 2010. Citron (citron melon), Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Mats & Nakai. Horticultural Sciences Department. Florida Cooperative Extension Service. Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/fw013. Accessed: December 12, 2011.Google Scholar
Jhala, A. J. and Hanson, B. D. 2011a. Summer weed control with glyphosate tank mixed with indaziflam or penoxsulam in California orchards and vineyards. Proceedings of the 51st Annual Conference of the Weed Sceince Society of America. Portland, OR : Weed Science Society of America. http://wssaabstracts.com/public/4/proceedings.html. Accessed: March 30, 2012.Google Scholar
Prochaska, S. C. and Fretz, T. A. 1976. Herbicide combinations for weed control in Skyline honeylocust. J. Arboric. 2 :233–136.Google Scholar
Singh, M., Malik, M., Ramirez, A.H.M., and Jhala, A. J. 2011a. Tank mix of saflufenacil with glyphosate and pendimethalin for weed control in Florida citrus. HortTechnology 21 :606–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, M., Ramirez, A. M., and Edenfield, M. 2011b. Indaziflam: a new pre-emergence herbicide for citrus. Proceedings of the 51st Weed Science Society of America Annual Conference. Portland, OR : WSSA. http://wssaabstracts.com/public/4/proceedings.html. Accessed March 15, 2012.Google Scholar
Smith, D. T. and Cooley, A. W. 1973. Wild watermelon emergence and control. Weed Sci. 21 :570–573.Google Scholar
[USDA] United States Department of Agriculture. 2012. Plant profile. Citrullus lanatus var. citroides. http://plants.usda.gov. Accessed: 31 January 2012.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M. 2001. Weed survey—southern states. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 54 :249–250.Google Scholar
Young, J. H., Peterson, N. K., Donald, J. O., and Mayfield, W. H. 1982. Harvesting, curing and energy utilization. Pages 458–487 in Pattee, H. E. and Young, C. T., eds. Peanut Science and Technology. Yoakum, TX : American Peanut Research Education Society.Google Scholar