Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T14:43:29.803Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Herbicide Selection and Application Timing for Control of Cressleaf Groundsel (Packera glabella)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jeremy T. Lake  and
Aaron G. Hager
Jeremy T. Lake
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
Aaron G. Hager*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: hager@uiuc.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted from 2004 through 2006 to evaluate cressleaf groundsel control following fall or early-spring preplant herbicide applications. Glyphosate, glyphosate + imazethapyr, glyphosate + 2,4-D ester, paraquat, paraquat + simazine, chlorimuron + tribenuron, and pendimethalin + glyphosate + 2,4-D ester applied in the fall controlled at least 93% of the cressleaf groundsel. Glyphosate, glyphosate + imazethapyr, glyphosate + 2,4-D ester, chlorimuron + tribenuron, and pendimethalin + glyphosate + 2,4-D ester applied in the spring provided at least 94% control of the cressleaf groundsel. Chlorimuron + tribenuron provided at least 98% control, regardless of application timing. These results indicate that herbicides applied in the fall or early spring can control cressleaf groundsel. However, certain herbicides provide greater control when applied in the fall compared with spring.

Keywords

Atrazinechlorimuronclomazonedicambadiflufenzopyrflumioxazinglyphosateimazaquinimazethapyrmesotrioneparaquatpendimethalinquincloracsimazinetribenuron2,4-D estercressleaf groundselPackera glabella (Poir.) C. Jeffrey SENGLFall appliedno tillspring appliedweedwinter annual
Type
Weed Management—Major Crops
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , June 2009 , pp. 221 - 224
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ball, D. A. 1992. Weed seedbank response to tillage, herbicides, and crop rotation sequence. Weed Sci 40:654–659.Google Scholar
Carey, J. B. and Defelice, M. S. 1991. Timing of chlorimuron and imazaquin application for weed control in no-till soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci 39:232–237.Google Scholar
Carmer, S. G., Nyquist, W. E., and Walker, W. M. 1989. Least significant differences for combined analysis of experiments with two or three-factor treatment designs. Agron. J. 81:665–672.Google Scholar
[CTIC] Conservation Technology Information Center 2006. Conservation Tillage and Plant Biotechnology: How New Technologies Can Improve the Environment by Reducing the Need to Plow. www.ctic.purdue.edu/CTIC/CTIC.html. Accessed: October 24, 2006.Google Scholar
[CTIC] Conservation Technology Information Center 2001. Better Soil Better Yields. A Guidebook to Improving Soil Organic Matter and Infiltration with Continuous No-Till. www.ctic.purdue.edu/CTIC/CTIC.html. Accessed: October 24, 2006.Google Scholar
Dahlke, B. J., Hayden, T. A., Leif, J. W., and Medlin, C. R. 2001. Fall application of imazaquin plus glyphosate (premix) for winter annual weed control in soybean. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc 56:93.Google Scholar
Gleason, H. A. and Cronquist, A. 1991. Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada. 2nd ed. New York: New York Botanical Garden. 559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Güeli, R. and Smeda, R. J. 2001. Soybean weed management with fall applied herbicides. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc 56:98.Google Scholar
Hasty, R. F., Sprague, C. L., and Hager, A. G. 2004. Weed control with fall and early-preplant herbicide applications in no-till soybean. Weed Technol 18:887–892.Google Scholar
Hilgenfeld, K. L., Martin, A. R., Mortensen, D. A., and Mason, S. C. 2004. Weed management in a glyphosate resistant soybean system: Weed species shifts. Weed Technol 18:284–291.Google Scholar
Kapadia, G., Ramdass, A., and Bada, F. 1990. Pyrrolizidine alkaloids of Senecio glabellus. Int. J. Crude Drug Res 28:67–71.Google Scholar
Kapusta, G., Autman, S., and Curvey, S. 1996. Soybean no-till early preplant weed control with sulfentrazone combinations. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. Res. Rep 53:497–499.Google Scholar
Kapusta, G. and Krausz, R. F. 1993. Weed control and yield are equal in conventional, reduced-, and no-tillage soybean (Glycine max) after 11 years. Weed Technol 7:443–451.Google Scholar
Krausz, R. F., Young, B. G., and Matthews, J. L. 2003. Winter annual weed control with fall- applied corn (Zea mays) herbicides. Weed Technol 17:516–520.Google Scholar
Lee, A. T. and Witt, W. W. 2001. Persistence and efficacy of fall-applied simazine and atrazine. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc 56:50.Google Scholar
Loux, M. M. and Dobbels, A. F. 2001. Managing common chickweed and purple deadnettle with fall and early-spring herbicide treatments. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc 56:31.Google Scholar
Martin, M. J., Flanigan, H. A., Hahn, K. L., and Saunders, D. W. 2002. Agronomic benefits of managing winter annual weeds with fall applications of chlorimuron ethyl + sulfentrazone mixtures. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc 57:110.Google Scholar
SAS Institute 2002. SAS User's Guide Version 9.1. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Schmidt, A. A., Johnson, W. G., Wait, J. D., Guttikonda, S. K., and Cordes, J. C. 2001. Fall applied herbicides for soybean. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. Res. Rep 58:324–325.Google Scholar
Stougaard, R. N., Kapusta, G., and Roskamp, G. 1984. Early preplant herbicide applications for no-till soybean (Glycine max) weed control. Weed Sci 32:293–298.Google Scholar