Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-14T13:12:47.056Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Postemergence Small Broomrape (Orobanche minor) Control in Red Clover

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Ryan D. Lins*
Affiliation:
Oregon State University, 107 Crop Science Building, Corvallis, OR 97331
Jed B. Colquhoun
Affiliation:
Oregon State University, 107 Crop Science Building, Corvallis, OR 97331
Charles M. Cole
Affiliation:
Oregon State University, 107 Crop Science Building, Corvallis, OR 97331
Carol A. Mallory-Smith
Affiliation:
Oregon State University, 107 Crop Science Building, Corvallis, OR 97331
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: ryan.lins@oregonstate.edu

Abstract

Small broomrape is an annual, parasitic weed that was discovered recently in Oregon's red clover seed production system. Field experiments were conducted in 2002 and 2003 at two locations to evaluate 10 herbicide treatments applied after small broomrape emergence in red clover. Bentazon, bromoxynil, glyphosate, imazamox, imazamox plus bentazon, imazethapyr, MCPA, and pendimethalin were evaluated. Small broomrape density, small broomrape seed viability after treatment, and clover injury and seed yield were quantified. Small broomrape control with imazamox, glyphosate, and imazamox plus bentazon treatments was greater than the nontreated check in both years. However, imazamox and imazamox plus bentazon treatments were the only herbicide treatments that consistently exhibited a high level of crop safety, reduced small broomrape density, and did not reduce red clover yield. Herbicide treatments did not prevent production of viable small broomrape seeds. Future research is needed to develop control options that will prevent red clover yield loss and viable small broomrape seed production when applied before small broomrape emergence.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Aly, R., Goldwasser, Y., Eizenberg, H., Hershenhorn, J., Golan, S., and Kleifeld, Y. 2001. Broomrape (Orobanche cumana) control in sunflower (Helianthus annuus) with imazapic. Weed Technol. 15:306309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baccarini, A. and Melandri, B. A. 1967. Studies on Orobanche hederae physiology: pigments and CO2 fixation. Physiol. Plant. 20:245250.Google Scholar
Barker, E. R., Press, M. C., Scholes, J. D., and Quick, W. P. 1996. Interactions between parasitic angiosperm Orobanche aegyptiaca and its tomato host: growth and biomass allocation. New Phytol. 133:637642.Google Scholar
Eizenberg, H., Colquhoun, J. B., and Mallory-Smith, C. A. 2005. A predictive degree-days model for small broomrape (Orobanche minor) parasitism in red clover in Oregon. Weed Sci. 53:3740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foy, C. L., Jain, R., and Jacobsohn, R. 1989. Recent approaches for chemical control of broomrape (Orobanche spp.) Rev. Weed Sci. 4:123152.Google Scholar
Garcia-Torres, L., Lopez-Granados, M., and Castejon-Munoz, M. 1987. Agronomic problems and chemical control of broomrapes (Orobanche spp.) in Spain: a studies review. in Weber, H. C. and Forstreuter, W., eds. Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Parasitic Flowering Plants. Marburg, Germany: FRG. Pp. 241248.Google Scholar
Goldwasser, Y., Eizenberg, H., Golan, S., and Kleifeld, Y. 2003. Control of Orobanche aegyptiaca in parsley. Crop Prot. 22:295305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hershenhorn, J., Goldwasser, Y., and Plakhine, D. et al. 1998. Orobanche aegyptiaca control in tomato fields with sulfonylurea herbicides. Weed Res. 38:343349.Google Scholar
Kleifeld, Y., Goldwasser, Y., Plakhine, D., Eizenberg, H., Herzlinger, G., and Golan, S. 1998. Selective control of Orobanche spp. in various crops with sulfonylurea and imidazolinone herbicides. in Joint Action to Control Orobanche in the WANA-region: Experiences from Morocco. Proceeding of Regional Workshop, Rabat, Morocco. Rabat, Morocco: GTZ gmbh. P. 26.Google Scholar
Manschadi, A. M., Kroschel, J., and Sauerborn, J. 1996. Dry matter production and partitioning in the host-parasite association Vicia faba-Orobanche crenata . J. Appl. Bot. 70:224229.Google Scholar
Parker, C. and Riches, C. 1993. Orobanche species: the broomrapes. in Parker, C. and Riches, C., eds. Parasitic Weeds of the World: Biology and Control. Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona Press. Pp. 111164.Google Scholar
Pieterse, A. H. 1979. The broomrapes (Orobanchaceae): a review. Abstr. Trop. Agric. 5:735.Google Scholar
Qasem, J. R. 1998. Chemical control of branched broomrape (Orobanche ramosa) in glasshouse grown tomato. Crop Prot. 17:625630.Google Scholar
Ross, K. C., Colquhoun, J. B., and Mallory-Smith, C. A. 2004. Small broomrape (Orobanche minor) germination and early development in response to plant species. Weed Sci. 52:260266.Google Scholar
Saghir, A. R., Foy, C. L., and Hameed, K. M. 1973. Herbicide effects on parasitism of tomato by hemp broomrape. Weed Sci. 21:253258.Google Scholar
ter Borg, S. J. 1986. Effects of environmental factors on Orobanche-host relationships; a review and some recent results. in Proceeding of a Workshop on Biology and Control of Orobanche., Wageningen, The Netherlands: LH/-VPO. Pp. 5769.Google Scholar
Zehhar, N., Ingouff, M., Bouya, D., and Fer, A. 2002. Possible involvement of gibberellins and ethylene in Orobanche ramosa germination. Weed Res. 42:464469.Google Scholar
Zollinger, R. K. and Fitterer, S. A. 1998. Utility of imazamox in dry beans. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 51:118119.Google Scholar