Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T11:28:57.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preemergence Weed Control in Soybean with Cloransulam

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jeff W. Barnes  and
Lawrence R. Oliver
Jeff W. Barnes*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
Lawrence R. Oliver
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: barnesjeffreyw@johndeere.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted from 1999 to 2001 to evaluate preemergence (PRE) activity of cloransulam on broadleaf weed species and to determine the effectiveness of cloransulam as a PRE herbicide in glyphosate-resistant soybean weed management systems. Cloransulam PRE controlled prickly sida, velvetleaf, and morningglory species even at reduced rates (recommended rate 36 g ai/ha) but only suppressed growth of Palmer amaranth, hemp sesbania, and sicklepod. Cloransulam applied PRE provided initial control or suppression of most weeds, but late-season control declined appreciably. Adding metribuzin to cloransulam PRE generally improved control of hemp sesbania, Palmer amaranth, annual grasses, and morningglory species, leading to soybean yield increases. Control of weeds was greater on a silt loam soil compared with a silty clay soil. Delayed herbicide activation by rainfall or irrigation reduced control of hemp sesbania and prickly sida and affected efficacy more than soil texture. Single postemergence (POST) applications of glyphosate or fomesafen plus fluazifop-P provided 90% or less control of most weed species. When glyphosate POST or fomesafen plus fluazifop-P POST followed PRE applications of cloransulam or cloransulam plus metribuzin PRE, control of all weeds was generally greater than 85%. The highest soybean yields were recorded from treatments that contained sequential PRE followed by (fb) POST herbicide applications. Composition of weed flora determined the effect of herbicide program on soybean seed yield. No yield benefit was gained from the sequential program when the dominant species was Palmer amaranth, which was controlled by glyphosate. When hemp sesbania was the dominant species, PRE herbicides fb glyphosate POST increased yield compared with total POST glyphosate.

Keywords

Cloransulamfluazifop-Pfomesafenglyphosatemetribuzinhemp sesbania, Sesbania exaltata (Raf) Rydb. ex A. W. Hill #3 SEBEXmorningglory species, Ipomoea spp.Palmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats # AMAPAprickly sida, Sida spinosa L. # SIDSPsicklepod, Senna obtusifolia L. Irwin and Barnaby # CASOBvelvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medicus # ABUTHsoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. GLXMAEntireleaf morninggloryglyphosate-resistant soybeanpitted morningglorysequential herbicide programstall morninggloryCOC, crop oil concentratefb, followed byPOST, postemergencePRE, preemergenceWAE, weeks after emergenceWAT, weeks after postemergence treatment.
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , December 2004 , pp. 1077 - 1090
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, W. P. 1996. Soybeans. in Weed Science Principles and Applications. New York: West. Pp. 286–291.Google Scholar
Askew, S. D., Wilcut, J. W., and Langston, V. B. 1999. Weed management in soybean (Glycine max) with preplant-incorporated herbicides and cloransulam-methyl. Weed Technol. 13:276–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corrigan, K. A. and Harvey, R. G. 2000. Glyphosate with and without residual herbicides in no-till glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 14:569–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpepper, A. S., York, A. C., Batts, R. B., and Jennings, K. M. 2000. Weed management in glufosinate- and glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 14:77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cupples, A. M., Sims, G. K., Hultgren, R. P., and Hart, S. E. 2000. Effect of soil conditions on the degradation of cloransulam-methyl. J. Environ. Qual. 29:786–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalley, C. D., Kells, J. J., and Renner, K. A. 2004. Effect of glyphosate application timing and row spacing on corn (Zea mays) and soybean (Glycine max) yields. Weed Technol. 18:165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirks, J. T., Johnson, W. G., Smeda, R. J., Wiebold, W. J., and Massey, R. E. 2000. Use of preplant sulfentrazone in no-till, narrow-row, glyphosate-resistant Glycine max . Weed Sci. 48:628–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franey, R. J. and Hart, S. E. 1999. Time of application of cloransulam for giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 13:825–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzini, L. C., Hart, S. E., and Wax, L. M. 1999. Herbicide combinations for weed management in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 13:354–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, D. L., York, A. C., Griffin, J. L., Clay, P. A., Vidrine, P. R., and Reynolds, D. B. 1997. Influence of application variables of efficacy on glyphosate. Weed Technol. 11:354–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, C. A. and Purcell, L. C. 1997. Interference between hemp sesbania (Sesbania exaltata) and soybean (Glycine max) in response to irrigations and nitrogen. Weed Sci. 45:91–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klingaman, T. E. and Oliver, L. R. 1994. Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 42:523–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krausz, R. F., Kapusta, G., and Matthews, J. L. 1998. Sulfentrazone for weed control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 12:684–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, K. A. and Renner, K. A. 1998. Postemergence weed control with CGA-277476 and cloransulam-methyl in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 12:293–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolte, S. A. and Young, B. G. 2002. Efficacy and economic return on investment for conventional and herbicide-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 16:388–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norsworthy, J. K. 2003. Use of soybean production surveys to determine weed management needs of South Carolina farmers. Weed Technol. 17:195–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norsworthy, J. K. and Oliver, L. R. 2002. Pitted morningglory interference in drill-seeded glyphosate-resistant soybean. Weed Sci. 50:26–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, S. A. and Oliver, L. R. 2000. Weed control programs in drilled glyphosate-resistant soybean. Weed Technol. 14:413–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pline, W. A., Wilcut, J. W., and Edmiston, K. L. 2002. Postemergence weed control in soybean (Glycine max) with cloransulam-methyl and diphenyl ether tank-mixtures. Weed Technol. 16:737–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, K. N. 2000. Weed control in soybean (Glycine max) with cloransulam and diclosulam. Weed Technol. 14:293–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risley, M. A. and Oliver, L. R. 1991. Efficacy of imazaquin on various weed species. Weed Sci. 39:243–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, R. K., Pendergrass, R., and Hayes, R. M. 1999. Economic analysis of alternative herbicide regimes on Roundup Ready soybeans. J. Prod. Agric 12:449–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1999–2000. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Release 8.01 ed. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.Google Scholar
Shaw, D. R., Bennett, A. C., and Grant, D. L. 1999. Weed control in soybean (Glycine max) with flumetsulam, cloransulam, and diclosulam. Weed Technol. 13:791–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, D. L., Ralphs, M. H., and Evans, J. O. 1992. Logistic analysis for monitoring and assessing herbicide efficacy. Weed Technol. 6:424–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Wesenbeeck, I. J., Zabik, J. M., Wolt, J. D., Bormett, G. A., and Roberts, D. W. 1997. Field dissipation of cloransulam-methyl at four sites in the U.S. soybean market. J. Agric. Food Chem. 45:3299–3307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidrine, P. R., Miller, D. K., Griffin, J. L., and Caylor, J. P. 2000. Utility of firstrate (cloransulam-methyl) in soybean weed control programs. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 53:236–237.Google Scholar
Vidrine, P. R., Reynolds, D. B., and Griffin, J. L. 1992. Postemergence hemp sesbania (Sesbania exaltata) control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 6:374–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar